Skip to comments.
Stray Hydrogen Atoms Become Deadly for Starships Traveling at Light Speed
Popular Science ^
| 2/17/2010
| Jeremy Hsu
Posted on 02/18/2010 1:34:50 AM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
Science fiction writers may have to rethink how their starship crews survive travel near or beyond the speed of light. Even the occasional hydrogen atom floating in the interstellar void would become a lethal radiation beam that would kill human crews in mere seconds and destroy a spacecraft's electronics, New Scientist reports.
Just a few stray wisps of hydrogen gas -- fewer than two hydrogen atoms per cubic centimeter on average -- would translate into 7 teraelectron volts for a starship crew traveling at 99.999998 percent of the speed of light. That's as much fun for humans as standing in front of the proton beam created by the Large Hadron Collider, according to William Edelstein, a physicist at Johns Hopkins University.
Related Articles Superconducting Magnetic Heat Shield Could Protect Spacecraft During Reentry Is Warp Speed Possible? We Ask a String Theorist The Science of Star Trek
Tags Science, Jeremy Hsu, hydrogen, interstellar space travel, light speed, spaceships, star trek, starships, warp speedEdelstein added that the radiation dose would reach 10,000 sieverts within a second; the fatal radiation dose for humans is just 6 sieverts. He predicted that any extraterrestrials who might have created starships capable of such high speeds might have died upon their inaugural voyages, and New Scientist adds a preliminary funeral note for Kirk, Spock and the rest of Star Trek's USS Enterprise crew traveling at warp speeds.
But hold on a second. The warp speed concept of Star Trek supposedly involves manipulating space-time, so that the actual starship travels in a bubble of normal space-time.
(Excerpt) Read more at popsci.com ...
TOPICS: Technical
KEYWORDS: hydrogen; hydrogengas; lhc; lightspeed; physics; science; starships; stringtheory; theoreticalphysics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-61 next last
To: sonofstrangelove
A double-ended Orion drive starship would appear to be the appropriate answer at our current level of technology.
2
posted on
02/18/2010 1:38:23 AM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Spktyr
3
posted on
02/18/2010 1:39:02 AM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: Spktyr
A double-ended Orion drive starship would appear to be the appropriate answer at our current level of technology. Deceleration, yes. But wouldn't that retard initial forward acceleration?
4
posted on
02/18/2010 1:43:10 AM PST
by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
To: sonofstrangelove
Federation starships have navigation shields for just these kinds of things.
5
posted on
02/18/2010 1:48:29 AM PST
by
Future Snake Eater
("Get out of the boat and walk on the water with us!--Sen. Joe Biden)
To: Spktyr
6
posted on
02/18/2010 1:48:50 AM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: Spktyr
Hey ? as long as that stray atom can cook my eggs and bacon in 5 seconds flat, I 2’nd the agreement with you...
7
posted on
02/18/2010 1:49:35 AM PST
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: Future Snake Eater
You are correct. It also mentioned it in the article
8
posted on
02/18/2010 1:49:41 AM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
I choose the freezarinos, even if it takes longer.
9
posted on
02/18/2010 1:50:42 AM PST
by
bsf2009
To: Talisker
Somewhat. On the other hand, nothing, and I mean NOTHING known to human science is going to be getting through the giant bow shield/pusher plate.
As Project Rho puts it, even hitting the pusher plate with a contact-fused thermonuclear fusion warhead won’t do anything.: “If you are attacking an Orion drive spacecraft with nuclear warheads, they will just point their pusher plate at the missiles and laugh at you.”
Best part - it could be built using 1960s technology.
10
posted on
02/18/2010 1:53:43 AM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Spktyr
A gadgetrometer might solve the problem of the stray atom... it’s worth a try.
11
posted on
02/18/2010 1:54:15 AM PST
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: Star Traveler
something to think of as you travel through the stars
12
posted on
02/18/2010 1:56:08 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: HiTech RedNeck
" something to think of as you travel through the stars "
Yeah, but, watch out for that stray atom that will flow through your mind on that warp speed, no , wait, it's quantum speed.
13
posted on
02/18/2010 1:58:47 AM PST
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: Future Snake Eater
Indeed. What do they think those big dish's on the front of the engineering hulls are for. Satellite TV?
To: sonofstrangelove
To: American Constitutionalist
I’ll put my faith in the meters-thick pusher plate/shield, thanks anyway. :P
16
posted on
02/18/2010 2:06:33 AM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: sonofstrangelove
But as our traveler's speed increased to a significant percentage of light speed his mass would correspondingly increase and the the stray hydrogen atom would be little more than an insect on the windscreen.
17
posted on
02/18/2010 2:12:36 AM PST
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
Remember, the interstellar space is vastly composed of hydrogen. A proposal called an interstellar ramjet was to scoop this hydrogen and spit it out the back as thrust.
18
posted on
02/18/2010 2:19:46 AM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
I know hydrogen atoms floating in the interstellar void screw the grill up on my truck when I hit 85mph so I can imagine what it would do at light speed.
19
posted on
02/18/2010 2:23:49 AM PST
by
maddog55
(OBAMA, Why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
To: sonofstrangelove
I remember reading about that way back.Unfortunately the scoops needed to be huge (miles across) due to the scarcity of atoms in sufficient numbers to produce thrust.
Another form of thrust I remember was along the lines of detonating a hydrogen bomb directly behind a suitably armor plated spacecraft.
20
posted on
02/18/2010 2:27:13 AM PST
by
mitch5501
(Yeah,but is it shatterproof?)
To: mitch5501
That is the Orion project and would of worked.
21
posted on
02/18/2010 2:28:09 AM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
Right.
What stopped it,treaty on nukes in space?
Would have been some out of this world acceleration!
22
posted on
02/18/2010 2:30:09 AM PST
by
mitch5501
(Yeah,but is it shatterproof?)
To: American Constitutionalist
I channel surfed past dancing with the stars really fast one time.
To: mitch5501
Yes. The 1963 Test Ban Treaty and the 1967 Outer Space Treaty
24
posted on
02/18/2010 2:45:51 AM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: count-your-change
A little factoid. 90 percent of all the atoms in the cosmos is hydrogen.
25
posted on
02/18/2010 2:47:28 AM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
26
posted on
02/18/2010 2:55:32 AM PST
by
Malsua
To: sonofstrangelove
What are we waiting for ? Let’s build this.
27
posted on
02/18/2010 2:58:51 AM PST
by
Rummenigge
(there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
To: sonofstrangelove
But all the equations tell us nothing except light can travel at light speed.
So it is an asinine, oxymoronic conjecture in the first place.
28
posted on
02/18/2010 2:59:58 AM PST
by
djf
(I was raised never having to or wanting to kill anyone. Still don't want to. Will if I need to.)
To: djf
At those speeds wouldn’t you need total shielding to protect against high-speed atoms coming at you from the sides? They would miss the forward shield and hit at a fraction of the forward velocity but still have enough energy to kill and fry electronics. A solar flare going off nearby could provide a lateral or incidental high-speed stream which, at its own velocity, would kill or injure. More reason it’s going to be a long, long time before humans get way out there.
To: sonofstrangelove
Two words solve this problem.
"Navigational Deflectors."
To: Falcon4.0
Obviously all we’d have to do is fly in between the hydrogen ;)
31
posted on
02/18/2010 4:19:54 AM PST
by
ruiner
To: Spktyr
Just use the damn Stargate.
32
posted on
02/18/2010 4:20:21 AM PST
by
cizinec
To: maddog55
Mister Scot, full power to the front shields! Aye Captain!
(there taken care of)
33
posted on
02/18/2010 4:20:49 AM PST
by
Recon Dad
( USMC SSgt Patrick O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 121)
To: djf
But all the equations tell us nothing except light can travel at light speed. So it is an asinine, oxymoronic conjecture in the first place. Right, and man can never travel more than 50 miles per hour in one of those demonic steam engines. That speed would tear him apart. So lets stop trying, and just use a horse.
34
posted on
02/18/2010 4:21:09 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Iran should have ceased to exist Nov 5, 1979, but we had no president then either.)
To: Rummenigge
It’s nuclear powered. The greenies won’t let us get anywhere near construction of it.
Which is sad because a large (10,000 ton) Orion drive ship can carry 5300 tons - that’s right, TONS - from Earth orbit to Mars orbit *and back to Earth*. To give you an example of the speed the drive has, it could take you from Earth to Pluto and back to Earth in less than a year, while carrying hundreds of tons in supplies.
And we could have built one that massed eight million tons with 1960s technology. Alpha Centauri, anyone?
35
posted on
02/18/2010 4:27:11 AM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: mikey_hates_everything
Well, there’s some thought that a forward plate in the interstellar medium would cause a sort of ‘wake’ in what we’re seeing outside the sun’s bow-shock area that would provide protection. However, one could also generate magnetic shielding (again, with 60s tech) and provide shielding.
36
posted on
02/18/2010 4:29:36 AM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Talisker
“Deceleration, yes. But wouldn’t that retard initial forward acceleration?”
I see no reason to use the “R-word”.
To: sonofstrangelove
“...would translate into 7 teraelectron volts for a starship crew traveling at 99.999998 percent of the speed of light.”
Could be the clean energy solution we’ve been looking for.
38
posted on
02/18/2010 5:06:58 AM PST
by
pappyone
(New to Freep, still working a tag line.)
To: Spktyr
39
posted on
02/18/2010 5:22:28 AM PST
by
Rummenigge
(there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
To: sonofstrangelove
To: djf
To: sonofstrangelove
In my science fiction of FTL, the wormhole is devoid of any matter. That is just the way it is with my starship. Get over it.
42
posted on
02/18/2010 6:11:46 AM PST
by
GingisK
To: sonofstrangelove
That's as much fun for humans as standing in front of the proton beam created by the Large Hadron Collider, according to William Edelstein, a physicist at Johns Hopkins University.That's much better. I can really understand that analogy. If I had a Nickel for every time I have seen someone standing in front of the proton beam created by the Large Hadron Collider, I'd be a rich man.
To: sonofstrangelove
Note due to the laws of physics no ship can exceed one half the speed of its rocket exhaust. Since the exhaust can't exceed the speed of light the fastest a ship can go is .5C. So none of this matters unless someone invents a reactionless drive, and there are more than a few rules of physics that say that is also impossible.
As for an Orion, they are the coolest thing ever to come out of the mad science department. However their exhaust velocity is only 43,000 meters per second. As a comparison the Space Shuttle Main Engine is less than one tenth of that. But the speed of light is 299,792,458 meters per second. So the fastest that an Orion drive can go is .00007C. Great for a quick run out to Jupiter or Mars, but not interstellar. No need to worry about hydrogen atoms at that speed.
44
posted on
02/18/2010 6:23:43 AM PST
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: sonofstrangelove
Sounds good but it would take a very large scoop since there is about one hydrogen atom per cubic centimeter unless they are in one of the gas “clouds”.
45
posted on
02/18/2010 7:04:17 AM PST
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: sonofstrangelove
That’s why they invented the Infinite Improbability Drive.
46
posted on
02/18/2010 7:10:45 AM PST
by
dfwgator
To: dfwgator
"Thats why they invented the Infinite Improbability Drive." That Drive is soo last millenium...
Everyone knows the "Bistromathic Drive" powers all the cool cat's star ships...
47
posted on
02/18/2010 7:16:33 AM PST
by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
To: Spktyr
Is that pusher plate/shield lead ?
48
posted on
02/18/2010 2:39:43 PM PST
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: GonzoGOP
Note due to the laws of physics no ship can exceed one half the speed of its rocket exhaust. Since the exhaust can't exceed the speed of light the fastest a ship can go is .5C.If the ship reaches 1/2c and is ejecting exhaust at 1c, then how is momentum conserved if it does not accererate?
49
posted on
02/18/2010 2:55:02 PM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: American Constitutionalist
There are lots of different materials it can be made of. Lead is one of them, and would form at least one or multiple layers in other designs.
50
posted on
02/18/2010 3:18:43 PM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson