Posted on 02/20/2010 8:08:44 AM PST by marstegreg
The plan to Rahm through a health care bill on reconciliation may have gotten the Sheeple’s attention.
In 2000 the black percentage of population was 12.9. Guessing it is higher now. they voted 97% Obama.
too bad, so sad.
I hope he tanks
The “strongly” approved numbers are on a consistent downward trend. What seems to be the variable is softness in the “strongly” disapprove numbers which are almost on a downward trend as well.
Yeah, but Ras was savagely criticized by a number of FReepers simply because he didn't poll during the last few days. Most of these bashers seemed to be saying that Ras's failure to poll was a pro-Dhimmi act of deception, designed to hide Coakley's weakness, to discourage Brown voters, etc. The paranoid thou shalt have with thee always, I guess!
sweet
The die hards are too uninformed to know anything that is happening. They can’t learn either.
For now, but 20 million new citizens are on their way! And the American people will be so happy to have new competitors for vanishing jobs. If they can figure it out.
Hasn’t abortion really slowed the growth of the black population? Another unintended consequence of liberal policy
LLS
Two weeks ago, Rasmussen Reports released a poll showing that Republican challenger Scott Brown had closed the gap in Massachusetts to single digits. Prior to that release, “The overwhelming conventional wisdom in both parties… was that Martha Coakley was a lock,” writes The Politico’s Ben Smith, adding, “It’s hard to recall a single poll changing the mood of a race quite that dramatically.”
A week later, the shock continued as our final poll in the race showed that Brown had pulled to within two points of Coakley. In fact, among those who were certain they would vote, Brown was up by two.
Where does that leave us? On Intrade, Brown begins Monday morning as the slight favorite in the race. However, nobody really knows who will win because it all comes down to turnout. Clearly, Brown has the more enthusiastic support and has run a better campaign. If turnout remains low, he is likely to win. That’s why the president went to Boston. If his appearance boosts turnout among Democrats, the Democrat will win.
That’s a long way around saying that we’re right back where we were a week ago - at the time of the last Rasmussen Reports poll. Brown is leading slightly among those certain to vote, and Coakley will do better if more Democrats show up.
Public opinion really moved the last weekend before the election, which was after Rasmussen polled.
i would take R’s polls over any other poll out there.
You are right that he did hedge his bets, but his data was out of date by then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.