Sarah Palin's secret "laugh track" machine at Jay Leno show: makes Adam Lambert fans like her, too!

New Palin scandal: Leno might have piped in some laughter for her jokes ^ | March 6, 2010 | RonDog (and FRiends)

[RonDog]

Sarah Palin's secret "laugh track" machine at Jay Leno show:
makes Adam Lambert fans like her, too!
(An "after action" report from FReepers who were actually in the studio audience.)

In perhaps the worst possible development for the radical left since the discovery of Karl Rove's now infamous "Weather Machine," Governor Palin's recently exposed top secret "laugh track" machine appears to also have even more dastardly powers than were originally feared.

In addition to altering the space-time continuum, and reprogramming the master computers at NBC – to cause laughter during Sarah's monologue to appear where none had been before, and send well-intentioned jeers and "groans" from her wannabe stalkers into the abyss – this mysterious device apparently also exerts some kind of irresistible mind control powers over the loyal fans of "American Idol" megastar Adam Lambert, causing many of them to actually like the producer of the upcoming new "Alaska Valley Days" TV series, Governor Sarah Palin.

Or, at least, that's what the Kos Kids would like you to believe.

Many of those wacky ultra-left "conspiracy-mongers" who post at such online cesspools as the Daily Kos, Huffpo and DU have been foaming at the mouth all week about Sarah's "rock star" performance during for last week's taping of "Day Two" of Jay Leno's return to the traditional 11:35 pm time slot for the "Tonight Show."

Since I was actually in the studio audience last week when Governor Palin made her "comedy debut" – with a small band of "Palin palm print"-bearing FReepers (and FRiends) who had crashed the party with the intention of acting as "Ed McMahon" to Sarah's "Johnny Carson" – I call BS on their widely-reported, but easily-debunked, "laugh track" conspiracy theory.

In my not so humble opinion, however, the REAL "back story" behind last week's studio audience, which has naturally NOT been covered in the "State-Controlled Media" – was that a huge percentage of that relatively "pro-Palin" audience last week were "glamberts"– that is, hard core fans of "American Idol" singer Adam Lambert, whom many music lovers view as a contemporary reincarnation of Elvis. (Or, perhaps Liberace.)

In this thread, which will serve as the "after action" report for our recent Leno FReep, I intend to explore this strange – and very unexpected (to me) twist – on the controversial "big tent" philosophy of the new Republican party. And that strange new twist is, many Adam Lambert fans support Sarah Palin!

I am particularly interested in hearing on this thread from ADAM LAMBERT FANS who support Sarah Palin, but I would also like to hear from CONSERVATIVES who may have reservations about welcoming this new group of Palin supporters, many of whom have been NOT previously been engaged (or informed) in the political arena.

Personally, I like the concept of "My tent, my rules."

That is, we welcome the electoral support of just about ANYBODY – but only on OUR terms. I believe that the conservative political movement should be like America itself: everyone is welcome here – IF you agree to certain fundamental, non-negotiable principles.

Please post YOUR comments and opinions about Sarah Palin and the "glamberts" here.

Thank you,
RonDog

[Erik Latranyi]

I'm just dismayed to see Sarah being tied in so closely now to show biz, pop culture and tabloid sensationalism....and she's brought it on herself.

In today's world, this is how you break-through the media's lock on your image.

Besides, Reagan was part of pop culture, coming out of Hollywood. He knew how to use that for his advantage.

Reagan had decades of speeches under his belt, but the media tried to portray him as a fool from select movies he did. So Reagan took the message directly to the people.....that is what Palin is doing -- eliminating the filter.

[traderrob6]

For a President who often came across as cold and wooden, I thought it was actually pretty OK.

At the time, if you remember, it helped his personal ratings immensely.

[tarheelswamprat]

Terribly undignified...

But extremely effective. Nixon himself credited that appearance as giving him a major boost. It "humanized" him in the public's mind.

[spectre]

The fact that many Lambert fans support Sarah shouldn't surprise anyone.

Lambert and Palin are both Rogues.

BTW, aside from Adam's way over the top antics and flaming appearance, that boy can honestly sing!

sw

[gov_bean_ counter]

In addition, it was the "envelope pushing" show of its time. Very controversial but...

Very Funny.

[Renderofveils]

It is denying the cycle of decadence that is destroying us from within by subverting our cultural heritage.

What cultural heritage would that be? Puritan? Gold Rush era capitalism (which for the record is where I'd like to go back to in a perfect world.) Pre-WW2 isolationism? Post WW2 nuclear family? Drug sex and hippes of the 60s? Sex, drugs and rock'n'roll of the 70s? Drugs and decadence of the 80s? You pick a time, I guarantee you that drugs were a problem. Homosexuality was a problem. Teenage pregnancy wasn't that much of an issue; that's a Modern Moral Highground for folks to stand on. 14 year olds not too long ago were marrying age. Trust me, I see the forest. Trees don't blind me. So go ahead and let me know that I can't pick and choose where I can and can't look back in time and see how modern issues existed back when.

[RonDog]

...All in all, there may have been some laughter added over the top of her jokes, but only to enhance the audience’s reaction not fill it in completely. I am sure this is not the first time this has happened on a talk show.

Conclusion: D-bag Stinson is a liar.

Mallard T. Drake on March 5, 2010 at 10:10 PM

This is the only part of Mallard's insightful post on HotAir.com that I need to respectfully disagree with.

Here is a private reply that I sent to some Palin supporters who asked for MY opinion of this latest scandal:

...I don't plan to spend much time refuting the Kos Kids Konspiracies -- but OUR GROUP was probably the "laugh track" they thought they heard.

We only had a dozen or so FReepers (and FRiends) actually get in, so perhaps our support for Governor Palin did sound a little "forced" at times.

But it also may have helped that we were sitting directly under a microphone that may have made us sound louder to the TV audience at home than it would have to the bozo (sitting in another part of the studio audience) who wrote this screed.

I certainly did not hear HIS supposedly "loud" groans and sighes from where I was sitting -- in the center. Perhaps they really did have the mikes where he was sitting turned down. It sounds like where the "Rouge" people were sitting was where our friend Eric Golub was sitting. Maybe HE saw their "coloring books" -- and heard their "groans." WE certainly did not, from where we were sitting.

And OUR "Palin palm prints" didn't make it on the TV crowd shots either. The cameras were ignoring ALL of us in the audience, equally, I think.

On his side, over by the Tonight Show band, there were a lot of rather vocal Shaun White fans. Maybe that's why his mike was turned down, and did not pick up his sounds as well our mike did for our sounds -- at least for what the the audience at home was hearing. - RonDog

Some of that (now public) reply will make more sense after you read Stinson's original charges.

[9YearLurker]

Not aware of Adam Lambert until last week? And I thought I was woefully out of the mainstream pop culture! ;-)

[left that other site]

Adam wears MORE LIPSTICK than Sarah! LOL.

[Ghost of Philip Marlowe]

If you can’t see that our nation is in moral decline, what are you fighting to defend, our right to listen to thrash?

You are picking and choosing quite a strange array of time periods to point to, but the label you chose for each time period don’t point to a moral base. The closest you came was “Puritan,” and the fact that you chose that label indicates that you really don’t know much about the Puritans other than what your teachers have programmed you to think. The Puritans were actually a pretty fun bunch who didn’t mind drinking, lewdness, and having a wild time. They were “pure” in their interpretation of Biblical teaching.

It sounds like you believe the lie that Revisionist Historians have been preaching that American tradition is evil. I’d suggest “Patriot’s History of the US” and “the Politically Incorrect Guide to American History” if you’d like to read some history books that actually paint us as having a pretty good track record.

By the way, I’d go for the gold-rush era of capitalism in a heartbeat. Economically, we were far better-off under “Laisse Faire” (though there was not much that was actually hands-off about it) economics, and it was a far better banking system.

But I’d also go back to a time period to when pop culture was not so blatantly decadent. I know the Great Generation was not perfect, but I’d much rather go to a Glenn Miller concert than a Pearl Jam concert. Yes, the people had their faults and weaknesses, but we made a joint effort to shame wrongful behavior and praise virtuous behavior. When we allowed the Leftists to destroy the concept of right and wrong and of shame and praise, we allowed them to dictate the new right and wrong.

[raybbr]

Not counting Liberace?

Liberace? How passe. Not convinced he was a conservative, though.

[Big Horn]

I sure as hell know and love Palin. I have never heard of Lambert.

[RonDog]

...OUR GROUP was probably the "laugh track" they thought they heard.

...a small band of "Palin palm print"-bearing FReepers (and FRiends) who had crashed the party with the intention of acting as "Ed McMahon" to Sarah's "Johnny Carson" -- RonDog

For those of you not old enough to remember this CLASSIC "Tonight Show" tradition, see also, from wikipedia.org:

...For more than 30 years, McMahon introduced the Tonight Show with a drawn-out "Here's Johnny!"

His booming voice and constant laughter alongside the "King of Late Night" earned McMahon the nickname the "Human Laugh Track.."

Ed McMahon

McMahon in November 2005

[digger48]

Neh-ver heard of ‘im.

[Beagle8U]

I cut the damn thing twice and its still to short!

[RonDog]

Not aware of Adam Lambert until last week?

And I thought I was woefully out of the mainstream pop culture! ;-)

It gets worse. :o)

I had never heard of Shaun White until last week either!

[Mopp4]

I remember when Adam Lambert Was Called David Bowie!

LOL....Don't forget Boy George...

[SunkenCiv]

...at least, that's what the Kos Kids would like you to believe.

Thanks RonDog.

[AnnaZ]

I love it. Great report. lol.

I loved Adam Lambert on Idol last year (although I'm not so fond of his professional career so far), and I also have a lot of respect and admiration for Sarah Palin.

=)

[Al B.]

Thanks for the post. I really appreciate all your time & effort on this. Sorry you guys couldn’t meet the Guv.