Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Latest Survey of Polls: Democrats to Get Crushed in the States
Rasmussen, unless noted ^ | 3/25/10 | Dangus

Posted on 03/25/2010 1:16:33 PM PDT by dangus

The latest polls suggest the Republicans could pull off a sweep of unprecedented porportion in statehouse races, virtually wiping out the Democrat party. The following data come from the latest Rasmussen poll, if available. Otherwise, the poll source is noted. Results shown compare the Republican who performs best against the Democrats, versus the Democrat who performs best against Republicans. This may bias selection towards well-established candidates, and is not meant to suggest that the selected candidate is more electable or the best candidate. The party indicated is the party of the current leader, who is listed first. Further analysis follows the table.

Open Democratic Seats
Colorado: R: McInnis 48, Hickenlooper 42
Kansas: R: Brownback 55, Tolland 33
Maine: R: Mills 43, Mitchell 31
Michigan: R: Hoesktra 41, Dillon 34
New Mexico: D: Denish 45, Domenici 40
New York: No announced Democratic candidate (Likely D if Atty Gen. Cuomo Runs)
Oklahoma: R: Fallin 51, Edmonson 36
Oregon: D: Kitzhaber 40, Lim 38 (R favored: Kitzhaber is former Governor; Lim is largely unknown.)
Pennsylvania R: Corbett 46, Onorato 29
Tennessee R: Haslam 45, McWherter 27
Wisconsin R: Walker 48, Barret 42
Democrats for Re-election
Arkansas D: Beebe (unopposed, so far)
Illinois R: Brady 47, Quinn 37
Iowa R: Brandstad 52, Culver 36
Maryland D: O'Malley 49, Erlich 43
Massachusetts D: Patrick 35, Baker 32, Cahill (Ind.) 19 (Tossup: 3rd part voters likely to break towards an opponent of Patrick's)
New Hampshire D: Lynch 51, Kimball 32
Ohio R: Kasich 49, Strickland 38
Open Republican Seats
Alabama R: No polling, but Republicans are heavily favored.
California R: Whitman 45, Brown 39 (PPIC)
Connecticut D: Lamont 40, Foley 37 (R favored: Lamont is former Senator candidate, whereas Foley is unknown.)
Florida R: McCollum 48, Sink 36
Georgia R: Handel 42, Barnes 39
Hawaii D: Abercrombie 43, Aiona 34
Minnesota R: Seifert 41, Dayton 39
South Carolina R: Barrett 40, Rex 31
South Dakota R: Daugaard 41, Heindepreim 32
Vermont R: Dubie 46, Markowitz 39
Republican Incumbent Facing Difficult Primary
Arizona R: Martin 43, Goddard 38 (Brewer, who replaced Democratic Governor Napolitano, is losing)
Idaho R: (Challenger Rammell or Incumbent Governor Butch Otter would be heavily favored to win general election)
Nevada R: Sandoval 53, Reid 35 (Gibbons, rocked by sex scandal, is losing)
Unelected Republican Incumbent
Alaska R: Parnell widely expected to win easily.
Utah R: Herbert 55, Corroon 32
Republicans for Re-election
Nebraska R: Heineman 61, Lakers 23
Texas R: Perry 49, White 43
Already won in 2009
Virginia R: McDonnell 59, Deeds 41
New Jersey R: Christie 49, Corzine 45

If the latest Rasmussen poll results were used as ballots, the Democrats would win only eight statehouses. But its worse than that:

And yes, there's not likely to be more than six incumbents re-elected... from both parties combined!


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2010; 2010election; 2010midterms; 2010polls; dangus; democrats; elections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Bush_Democrat

Good times that! LOL!


21 posted on 03/25/2010 1:48:35 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dangus

You don’t have your facts put together very well.

Whitman vs Brown in California is gubernatorial race not a congrassional race. The race of interest is Boxer vs???? Right now Campbell leads that three way but I distrust that POS so...

Anyway, because of this glaring error on your part I trust none of the rest of your analysis or reporting


22 posted on 03/25/2010 1:50:38 PM PDT by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

If Republicans do pull off an major upset in states across the nation, they will be in a great position to legislate on Census results and redistricting.

I’m hoping the anger can be sustained and magnified from now until November. No doubt the media and democrats will attempt to throw distractions out one after the other till then.


23 posted on 03/25/2010 1:52:33 PM PDT by Crolis ("Nemo me impune lacessit!" - "No one provokes me with impunity!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the long march

“The race of interest is Boxer vs???? Right now Campbell leads that three way but I distrust that POS so...”

Actually, I heard that Carly Fiorina has pulled one point ahead of Tom Campbell.

http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/eyeon2010/2010/03/ppic-poll.html


24 posted on 03/25/2010 1:53:07 PM PDT by wk4bush2004 (PALIN-BACHMANN, 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: the long march

>> You don’t have your facts put together very well. Whitman vs Brown in California is gubernatorial race not a congrassional race.<<

I don’t gave my FACTS put together very well? Every race listed is a GOVERNOR’S race. The article is about the STATES, not D.C.

>> Anyway, because of this glaring error on your part I trust none of the rest of your analysis or reporting <<

I’m so crushed. (/sarc)


25 posted on 03/25/2010 1:53:48 PM PDT by dangus (Democrats: People retardants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

To quote the lead paragraph:

“Results shown compare the Republican who performs best against the Democrats, versus the Democrat who performs best against Republicans. This may bias selection towards well-established candidates, and is not meant to suggest that the selected candidate is more electable or the best candidate.”


26 posted on 03/25/2010 1:54:37 PM PDT by dangus (Democrats: People retardants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dangus

BUMP


27 posted on 03/25/2010 1:54:52 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Falcon28

>> Why is Domenici listed here? He’s polling at 5%. It should be Susana Martinez. <<

A fine question. And a fine question deserves a fine answer. And, oo, look! I happen to already have one ready. From the article:

“Results shown compare the Republican who performs best against the Democrats, versus the Democrat who performs best against Republicans. This may bias selection towards well-established candidates, and is not meant to suggest that the selected candidate is more electable or the best candidate.”

I would be interested in seeing your poll data about the race. The ones I saw, from NM St U had Domenici beating Martinez 29-11, as of Feb 13. Is your more current? Is she taking off in the polls?


28 posted on 03/25/2010 1:59:07 PM PDT by dangus (Democrats: People retardants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

That is good news-—— maybe???? I think Carly can beat old ugly Babs not so sure about any of the guys


29 posted on 03/25/2010 2:00:09 PM PDT by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Hey you are the one who labelled them open republican (or democrat) SEATS not me.


30 posted on 03/25/2010 2:02:12 PM PDT by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AzaleaCity5691

The trick with gambling is, if you don’t want to lose money don’t gamble. Do you really need a governmental body telling you how to spend you money? If Alabama votes Democrat over gambling then it is going to change the way I feel about Alabama voters.


31 posted on 03/25/2010 2:11:16 PM PDT by Sarah-bot (The bloom is off the fart blossum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dangus
virtually wiping out the Democrat party.

That, my man, is the plan.

32 posted on 03/25/2010 2:15:03 PM PDT by Bahbah (Only dead fish go with the flow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

So this points to an 8 seat pickup for Republicans in the senate. That means we need at least one more with a Republican POTUS and VP and a majority in The House in order to undo some of the devastation In 2012. Oh wait, this includes Olympia Snow.


33 posted on 03/25/2010 2:15:30 PM PDT by outofstyle (Anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Looks like the slimey RAT AG Edmondson of OK is still in hiding trying to decide if he wants to file a lawsuit. Our Republican Governor candidate Mary Fallin is going to win and Oklahoma will be back Red for Governor.

For those who do not know, Edmondson was the RAT AG of OK who went in on the side of Gore in the 2000 FL fiasco after the state went for Bush and then after that he went in on the side of CT against the Boy Scouts and he thinks he can win in OK.

Oklahoma is going red in 2010 to match how we voted for President against ZERO/Biden!


34 posted on 03/25/2010 2:40:31 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Rick Perry - TX Gov/Coburn/Rubio - Senate 2010 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

A good overview of governors races.


35 posted on 03/25/2010 2:44:21 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the long march

Are you under the weird impression that governors don’t have seats?


36 posted on 03/25/2010 3:26:35 PM PDT by dangus (Democrats: People retardants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: the long march

And did you read the FIRST SENTENCE?

“The latest polls suggest the Republicans could pull off a sweep of unprecedented porportion in STATEHOUSE races (emphasis added)...”


37 posted on 03/25/2010 3:27:40 PM PDT by dangus (Democrats: People retardants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: the long march
"Anyway, because of this glaring error on your part I trust none of the rest of your analysis or reporting."

Oh my!

I guess that means none of us can trust your ability to read, therefore we cannot trust a damned thing you say.

38 posted on 03/25/2010 4:08:37 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pb929

Not to mention the fact that we’ll be able to get tough voter ID laws through in all those states. Just imagine what would happen in PA if we could get a biometric voter ID law on the books.


39 posted on 03/25/2010 4:14:38 PM PDT by Windcatcher (Obama is a COMMUNIST and the MSM is is armband-wearing propaganda machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Is your more current? Is she taking off in the polls?

Well, it's not a statewide poll, but a pre-primary vote from the NM GOP Convention - it has Martinez winning 47% to Domenici's 5%. A candidate that doesn't crack the 20% barrier is required to obtain twice the number of signatures in order to be on the Primary ballot. We shall see.

Pre-Primary Poll

40 posted on 03/25/2010 7:14:05 PM PDT by Falcon28 (Allen West - 2012 * For a list of conservative candidates in 2010, see my profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson