Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Calls ‘Birther’ Doc’s Bluff
Military.com ^ | April 9, 2010 | Bryant Jordan

Posted on 04/09/2010 4:27:11 PM PDT by EveningStar

It's guts ball time for an Army surgeon who has vowed not to deploy to Afghanistan with his unit unless President Obama provides evidence that he's a "natural born" citizen of the United States.

In response to previously published statements by Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, the Army presented an official letter of counseling that directs him to report to Fort Campbell, Ky., on April 12 to begin deployment preparations with his unit.

(Excerpt) Read more at military.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: army; birthcertificate; birtherobama; birthers; certifigate; crackpot; lakin; military; moonbats; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamaisabirther; terrencelakin; terrylakin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 701-711 next last
To: tom h

I have never seen a birth certificate that states religion.


281 posted on 04/10/2010 4:22:02 AM PDT by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding

We have seen the government move further and further away from the Constitution for years and we have said nothing. Not only has the Constitution been diluted it has been molded to suit whatever the needs at the moment. Would anyone be surprised that the powers that be would feel very secure in putting up a candidate who is not a NBC? His mom was a citizen, in their minds that is enough.

I’m not sure I can explain this right but, I am sure defining NBC as two citizen parents would not only make Obama ineligible but it would effect so many citizens as well. Not as far as being President but their feelings of being NBC. I have seen it on these threads before, people who claim dual citizenship or their kids are dual citizens and they believe that they are NBC....the law is fine as long as it does not apply to them! God forbid people get upset! Just like we won’t enforce immigration laws, don’t want to upset anyone! Too much of a hassle!


282 posted on 04/10/2010 4:35:04 AM PDT by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Has ANY case been found to have merit?

Merit in who's eyes, the courts? The same courts who time and time again can not even be unanimous on the 2nd Amendment?

We the citizens supposedly are the ones who own this country, not the courts.

283 posted on 04/10/2010 4:39:07 AM PDT by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative

According the to the Kenya grandmother, she was already there in Kenya and wanted to go back and the airlines would not let her.


284 posted on 04/10/2010 4:41:42 AM PDT by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative

Where did the term Natural Born Citizen come from? Did the framers make it up on their own?


285 posted on 04/10/2010 4:46:32 AM PDT by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; A_Former_Democrat; Smokeyblue; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; ...

Google “Bonus Army” and see what “esteemed” fellows like MacArthur, Eisenhower and Patton were doing those days, hmmmm!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWvCCxOUsM8


286 posted on 04/10/2010 5:02:08 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1

thank you for educating me....I just posted, not thinking or reviewing this story.
MY Bad.

For a Military Officer to do this is akin to those German officers who tried to assasinate Hitler...I know the comparison is a stretch. But it is high ranking military who question the legitimacy of their leadership.

He is walking a fine line and I will pray for him. he has a LOT at stake and I for one, don’t know if I would have the guts to do this.


287 posted on 04/10/2010 5:29:00 AM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Ok, joke's over....Bring back Bush !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: BP2

thank you for all the info...

Please see my post 287.


288 posted on 04/10/2010 5:30:02 AM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Ok, joke's over....Bring back Bush !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
What should happen to a guy who became president because he committed forgery and perjury? What should happen to a guy who in the very act of swearing to uphold the Constitution in his oath of office is committing perjury because he knows he himself is an enemy of the Constitution committing treason by making the oath?

He should be impeached, removed, and prosecuted. But that can't be done on your opinion alone. Proof is nice.

What should happen when that happens?

Biden would become president.

289 posted on 04/10/2010 5:33:46 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Yes the judge will be an officer, a JAG officer. But he/she will have no where near the power that a civilian trial judge has.

Yeah, acutally, he will. A General Court Martial is run very much along the lines of a civilian criminal court. The members of the court martial board act as jury, unless LCOL Lakin decides he wants the judge alone to decide his fate. One major difference is that the verdict doesn't have to be unanimous. It only takes 2/3rd to convict.

290 posted on 04/10/2010 5:43:12 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
The SCOTUS and the lower courts have shown ZERO interest in this ‘case’. They have not, nor will they, touch it.

Its not a matter of interest, someone has to bring them a case they can hear.

291 posted on 04/10/2010 5:49:52 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Oh yes proof would be nice wouldn’t it, and the only reason proof has not been provided is that Obama and the State of Hawaii are using every legal means at their disposal to prevent the proof from ever reaching a courtroom.

Sadly that is not the most effective way of disproving his critics, in fact it is the least effective and has cost millions of dollars that could have been saved by a simple $12 request for a certified copy of the original document....

And yet we are lead to believe that this drama is meant to cause his detractors to look like fools while he skirts the issue, how long does that work any way?

How many years do you get to hide your origins before it backfires on you?

Remember the Nixon Tapes? there is a perfect example of how eventually even a president cannot hide the truth, and every attempt to hide the truth that he made eventually rebounded upon him.


292 posted on 04/10/2010 6:01:15 AM PDT by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
1. Doctor's own long form birth certificate: I would like the courageous military doctor to post his OWN long form birth certificate on his website in order to show President Obama how easy it is to show one's birth certificate in public.

2. If the doctor faces a court martial, I hope he displays his own long form birth certificate in court in order to show President Obama and his supporters how easy it is to present one's own long form birth certificate in public.

293 posted on 04/10/2010 6:04:27 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Met a young lady in the Philippines..she is around 20 years old..born in Negros Oriental..one day was looking at her birth certificate..and was shocked to see in the block Sex was typed male..she is clearly a female..but the person who typed the form made an error. The name is female.

No one noticed or paid much attention till I read it. The form is in English..but it is not their first language or second. 1. Visaya 2. Tagalog 3. English.

I really have no idea where Obama was born, but he is hiding something on that birth certificate.


294 posted on 04/10/2010 6:38:26 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Maybe they checked Obama was born on a plantation...lol


295 posted on 04/10/2010 6:40:50 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative; Las Vegas Ron
And Minor vs. Hapersett very clearly does not give a definition of natural born citizen. Carefully read the text:

“The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens. .”

I just did. Did you??? are you capable of deciphering the plain meaning of words???

The text read by any logical literate person who is not an elitist liberal lawyer or an Obamabot, whether or not they stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night, says clearly that the first class of citizen is:

"all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. ...

The author of these words subsequently refers to another class of children without reference to the citizenship of their parents that some authorities claim should be "citizens" [not natural born citizens, just citizens]. There have been doubts as to the citizenship of this second class, but not "the first".

This understanding is confirmed by American immigration law at the time since the U.S. Government considered this second class not just to be doubtful citizens, but to be actually "aliens and foreigners" -- until their fathers or they themselves were naturalized.

Check your history some time and reread the above again if necessary. I hope this helps. If not, try spending a night in a Holiday Inn Express -- or a week -- or a month -- or longer.

296 posted on 04/10/2010 7:06:21 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

would like to see the file copies of that document..to see who checked off on it..the corrections/additions made..copies made and forwarded..what offices it was coordinated..

The date stamp is not correct...should be 11 December 2009 or 11 Dec 09.


297 posted on 04/10/2010 7:08:38 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom
The SCOTUS and the lower courts have shown ZERO interest in this ‘case’. They have not, nor will they, touch it.

Its not a matter of interest, someone has to bring them a case they can hear.

The courts are clearly prejudiced against the dental profession...perhaps if a good diesel mechanic or Wal-Mart greeter would resubmit some of these cases, they might start making their way through our judicial system.

298 posted on 04/10/2010 7:13:03 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Examine your post #31 which mentions “truthers” thus legitimizing my characterization of “truthers.

I did not characterize “birthers” which, IMO, is an entirely different subject. Similarly, there are some who are unable to understand that my condemnation of Lafkin is based exclusively on his refusal to deply and has absolutely nothing to with the issue of Obongo's legitimacy.

A professional soldier should understand.

299 posted on 04/10/2010 7:13:24 AM PDT by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

One more item seal is for DOD..should be a department of the army.seal..they are using DOD stationary on an army letter..lol..


300 posted on 04/10/2010 7:20:56 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 701-711 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson