Posted on 04/10/2010 11:05:25 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
(snip)
Mr. Grayson argues that some of Dr. Pauls ideas (getting rid of the Departments of Energy, Education and Commerce) are too weird for Kentucky. And in increasingly sharp ads, he argues that Dr. Paul is downright dangerous when it comes to foreign policy.
Heres a guy who is outside of the Republican mainstream, Mr. Grayson said in an interview here.
(snip)
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Stud!!
Maybe he was hoping. You know those Bay area folks
Have a great evening, troll. If, or should I say "when?" you get banned, no legitimate freeper will miss you. :)
Uh huh. Whatever you say, ma'am.
See ya.
You can kiss my a$$. You’re disgusting.
Nah, I won’t bother. You know you lie; I know you lie, we’ll leave it at that. I have no more desire to spar with you or your cronies. You all seem to want no change of any sort if it means actually SHRINKING government, because it would gore YOUR ox, and you can’t have that. Besides, I have learned that when I argue with idiots, you invariably want to beat me down with your lies, then clobber me with your experience at idiocy.
So go ahead on and tell your lies. There’ll be someone to call you on it. I just won’t be the one. I’m too tired and too busy actually DOING something to save my Country and the Constitution to bother with you any more. You... you and your ilk are way too busy giving each other high fives to be actually out in the trenches DOING something. Y’all are totally disgusting excuses for humanity. Similar to, but not unlike the dog in the manger... YOU can’t do anything with it, but damned if you’ll let someone ELSE make good use of it... and if someone TRIES, you’re right there to spread your lies, gossip and innuendo. Typical womanly stuff. Except that, unlike REAL women, you specialize in the stab in the back, or the cup of hemlock, a la the Borgias. (I know the difference, you see: MY wife’s a REAL woman; you are merely a pallid, poor imitation of one.)
DId you HONESTLY jut say that????
KOKESH IS A TRAITOR!!
KOKESH WENT to Ansbach Germany, videotaped himself callin on troops to desert in time of war!! Kokesh’s account is STILL on the IVAW website!
You WOULD VOTE FOR A TRAITOR?????
Are you SMOKING CRACK???
RON PAUL AND ADAM KOKESH THE TRAITOR ARE HOOKED AT THE HIP!!!
GOGLE:
KOKESH + ANSBACH
KOKESH + BAND OF MOTHERS
KOKESH + RON PAUL
KOKESH + IVAW
KOKESH + SCHIFF
KOKESH + CODE PINK
MARINE! WAKE UP!!
I see you are afflicted with ‘lastworditis.’
(Yawn). Really? Gee, I wonder which of us is afflicted the worst.
See ya.
I'm supporting Tom Mullins in the GOP Primary.
But, yes -- if Kokesh were to win the GOP nomination, I'd vote for Kokesh over the Democrat.
The Democrat, Ben Lujan, is radically pro-Abortion. I won't support or vote for pro-Abortion candidates. (It's one of the few reasons that I don't write very much in favor of Peter Schiff, much as I might otherwise approve of his Austrian-school economics).
That's just a personal promise to myself, and not something I impose upon others. But do you have a problem with me choosing to stand by my own personal vow on the subject of Pro-Abortion politicians?? Good grief.
What in the world makes you think kokesh is PRO-LIFE???
EVERYthing about this guys past , as far as his personal views, his politics, shows he is a Marxist!
He is a Leftist!
What possibly reason do you have to all of a sudden think he is now the second coming of Ronal reagan??
If you genuinely think his TREASON is excusable, in any way, shape, manner or form, then you are a fool. To try and say that any other subject is even comparable, you are a fool!
What possible reason do you have to trust him on anything??
Mr. Bannon, why do I need to respond to your questioning when you've said the answer yourself?
Like you said yourself, I DON'T know enough about Adam Kokesh's personal history to have a "possible reason do you have to trust him on anything" -- which is why I prefer to support his opponent, Tom Mullins. (Believe me, if I thought for one second that Kokesh was "now the second coming of Ronal reagan" as you put it -- I'd support him, not his opponent).
By contrast, I'm pretty confident that his opponent, Tom Mullins, really is genuinely Pro-Life. Which is why I'm supporting Tom Mullins.
BUT, if the race somehow did come down to Kokesh versus Lujan -- then I KNOW that Lujan is radically Pro-Abortion; and so I would votefor Kokesh and AGAINST the Pro-Abortion candidate, Lujan.
We can play this game with any Congressional race you like, not just this one. Name ANY Congressional race between a known Pro-Abortion Democrat, and a "maybe-Pro-Life" Republican -- and yes, I'll support the Republican against the Democrat, and hope for the best.
Like I said, this is a personal vow to which I adhere on the subject of Pro-Abortion politicians. ALL Pro-Abortion politicians. Ben Lujan does not get a "Pass", sorry.
You also keep saying that yer gonna vote for Kokesh if it somes down to Kokesh vs anyone
I am going to refuse to vote for someone like that, no matter what.
We are NOT required to vote, and if the vote is between two complete losers, I am not going to vote for a traitor to keep party unity or whatever
That's fine. I respect your point of view.
In the meantime, however -- I expect that Mullins will win the GOP nomination, not Kokesh, so it will be a moot point anyway.
...Then I will happily join you in smearing Kokesh into the dirt, on the very grounds of party unity which you dismiss as unimportant.
But hopefully, Mullins will win the nomination handily, and Kokesh will shut up and go away. OR demonstrate that he's going to be a good "team player" Republican, and urge his supporters to vote for Tom Mullins -- like a good Republican should, in respect to a decent Republican Primary opponent.**
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.