Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Do We Do If the Rich Start to Leave?
Real Clear Markets ^ | 04/11/2010 | Bill Frezza

Posted on 04/12/2010 8:19:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Edited on 04/12/2010 8:21:54 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

The numbers are small. A modern record, to be sure, and an embarrassment to some. But nothing to be alarmed about. Better to just curse their greed, slap an exit tax on their assets, and move on. There are plenty more where they came from.


(Excerpt) Read more at realclearmarkets.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: atlasshrugged; lping; rich; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-200 next last
To: mlocher

That giant sucking sound started after WWII.


121 posted on 04/12/2010 9:14:18 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This would be a serious concern IF anywhere else were better... but unfortunately socialism/communism has spread to every corner of the world.

There is no where left free to run to.

122 posted on 04/12/2010 9:14:49 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Those boys aren’t going to have to worry about getting any diseases from that pure sweet young lady, no sir!


123 posted on 04/12/2010 9:15:21 AM PDT by ottbmare (I could agree wth you, but then we'd both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: j.argese
Be a wealth camel

I have known that for the last half century and still find myself riding a wealth pack rat . Maybe a small team of pack rats at best .

124 posted on 04/12/2010 9:16:13 AM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They’ll go where the money has been going for the past 50 or so years - India, China, and other emerging third-world countries where profits are high and the regs minimal.


125 posted on 04/12/2010 9:16:54 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

With the end of the Cold War and the abandonment of Communism by China, Russia and Eastern Europe, there are many more options for capital to go. Life was peachy here in the US, when most of the rest of the world was engaged in very inefficient, centrally planned economies.


126 posted on 04/12/2010 9:17:05 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If I was going to go any where I might invest my money in Kazakhstan.


127 posted on 04/12/2010 9:17:32 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Jim Rogers went to Singapore, to kick back and let his kids learn Mandarin for their future.

Singapore is an English-speaking country.... more or less.

128 posted on 04/12/2010 9:17:52 AM PDT by Wissa (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

The idea is to find someplace more disorganized.


129 posted on 04/12/2010 9:18:33 AM PDT by esquirette ("Our hearts are restless until they find rest in Thee." ~ Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: henkster
Chile

Vacationed there in 2005 and also my first choice. Hat tip to Pinochet, who managed to purge a number of lefties.

130 posted on 04/12/2010 9:22:15 AM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- follow the money and you'll find truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
If I was going to go any where I might invest my money in Kazakhstan.


131 posted on 04/12/2010 9:23:18 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Wissa

I would bet both of their nannies and all of their hired tutors, tennis instructors, swimming teachers, dance teachers, riding teachers, piano teachers, maids, butlers, cooks etc

all speak Mandarin to them

His way of living in Singapore is not what I can afford!


132 posted on 04/12/2010 9:23:51 AM PDT by silverleaf (Karl Marx was NOT one of America's Founding Fathers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m more worried about when the “rich” go Galt...


133 posted on 04/12/2010 9:24:29 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (We were hoping for flying unicorns that crapped skittles. We got nationalized health care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator_Blutarski

It is immoral to take money from people who work


134 posted on 04/12/2010 9:25:19 AM PDT by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Where to? Well the article is about the 1% of Americans who pay 40% of the taxes. Places like The Cayman Islands, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Costa Rica, Belieze, Hong Kong and Singapore, and Monaco all come to mind as popular tax havens for the rich.

Probably a significant number are here on green cards, think of all the wealthy Indian’s from high-tech industry. Many of them can go home to India and enjoy lower taxes and lower cost of living. Their market is growing fast, too. So plenty of opportunity to invest and make good profits there.

The endless tax increases that is the only Democratic plan for fixing our budget woes will force people to find alternatives. Like many Freepers I’ve already moved twice, in part to place myself into more tax-friendly states. How many wealthy people (and even the merely productive high wage earning middle class like myself) have bailed on California? One million? More?


135 posted on 04/12/2010 9:30:48 AM PDT by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: windcliff

Nam muy chin....


136 posted on 04/12/2010 9:33:18 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Senator_Blutarski
We are talking about income here, not wealth. Why is it a virtue to take money from people who work hard and give it to people who don't work hard?

It isn't. But, I hope you're not implying that a wealth tax would be fairer.

137 posted on 04/12/2010 9:34:34 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The truly rich are unlikely to move because they already know how to shelter their wealth. What we will do is what BO and the democrat party have planned all along. We in the middle class (upper, middle and lower) will be classified as rich and we will be taxed to our last breath. That has always been the plan; get rid of the Kulaks and is the reason why the truly big money people mostly support BO and the democrats.

FUBO


138 posted on 04/12/2010 9:36:39 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
If you are a US citizen and leave the US, you are subject to income taxes for 10 (?) years. You must pay your taxes regardless of where you live, where you make money, and where you park your money.

Says them. But, really, the USA has no ability to force outher countries to follow our laws vis-a-vis former citizens of the USA.

The Soviet Union considered the skills it's athletes and artists had to be the property of the USSR. I'm sure they had all sorts of thing that the many artists who defected during the Cold War were supposed to do to make up their bills to the USSR. We didn't honor those laws. Why should these other countries care about our extra-territorial claims. We are becoming a pariah nation, like the USSR was.

139 posted on 04/12/2010 9:37:15 AM PDT by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: OrioleFan
As reported in the Wall Street Journal, May 27, 2009:

Maryland couldn't balance its budget last year, so the state tried to close the shortfall by fleecing the wealthy. Politicians in Annapolis created a millionaire tax bracket, raising the top marginal income-tax rate to 6.25%. And because cities such as Baltimore and Bethesda also impose income taxes, the state-local tax rate can go as high as 9.45%. Governor Martin O'Malley, a dedicated class warrior, declared that these richest 0.3% of filers were "willing and able to pay their fair share." The Baltimore Sun predicted the rich would "grin and bear it." One year later, nobody's grinning. One-third of the millionaires have disappeared from Maryland tax rolls. In 2008 roughly 3,000 million-dollar income tax returns were filed by the end of April. This year there were 2,000, which the state comptroller's office concedes is a "substantial decline." On those missing returns, the government collects 6.25% of nothing. Instead of the state coffers gaining the extra $106 million the politicians predicted, millionaires paid $100 million less in taxes than they did last year -- even at higher rates.

140 posted on 04/12/2010 9:38:07 AM PDT by In Maryland ("Impromptu Obamanomics is getting scarier by the day ..." - Caroline Baum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson