Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/26/2010 10:03:20 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: EternalVigilance

Works in China, after all.


2 posted on 06/26/2010 10:05:48 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Let me be clear. The voluntary pancipation of Cinco de Quatro is mandated in all 57 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Am I the only one who does not believe ANYTHING obammy or his regime says?

However, this sort of talk is making a lot of people madder—and hopefully, they will replace a lot of congresscritters in the upcoming election, thereby neutering a lot of their power.


4 posted on 06/26/2010 10:09:53 AM PDT by basil (It's time to rid the country of "Gun Free Zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
the bill puts limits on the powers the president already has to cause "the closing of any facility or stations for wire communication" in a time of war

As if Obama cares about limits on power defined in the law or in the US Constitution.

He has already shown that he will ignore the Constitutional limits on Presidential powers, break any law and do what he wants, when he wants.

And the rumpswabbers in congress are only too happy to follow their tyrannical half-black messiah down the road to despotism, and Soviet style socialism.
.

6 posted on 06/26/2010 10:16:50 AM PDT by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Elections have consequences.


8 posted on 06/26/2010 10:18:44 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

somebody ping the ham radio guys.


9 posted on 06/26/2010 10:19:44 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (so far behind the curve, it's in back of me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Imagine if this had been tried while Bush and Cheney were in office. Every wacko leftist from 12 years old to 104 would be screaming their collective heads off.


10 posted on 06/26/2010 10:21:39 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Hey, Barack "Hubris" Obama, $10 is all it would take, why spend millions to cover it up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXzQD2SRESs


15 posted on 06/26/2010 10:26:12 AM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

It’s a great day for fascism!

Thank you RINOs! :) Selling us out one freedom at a time. :)


16 posted on 06/26/2010 10:27:25 AM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Misleading headline: not the full Senate, just a committee.


18 posted on 06/26/2010 10:29:28 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Obama suffers from decision-deficit disorder." Oliver North 6/25/10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

That is a very misleading headline by TechWorld.

The very first sentence explains that this has NOT been approved by the Senate but by a Senate committee.

Hopefully the pubbies will grow some cojones and stop this Marxist takeover.


21 posted on 06/26/2010 10:37:33 AM PDT by upchuck (Don't let freedom slip away. After America, there is no place to go ~ Kitty Werthmann - Google her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
Thanks W. Thanks Alberto Gonzales. Thanks for all your combined stupid ideas Big Brother Power Grabs with precedents set for all future presidents.
24 posted on 06/26/2010 10:38:51 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

“Changes are needed to ensure that cybersecurity measures do not unnecessarily infringe on free speech, privacy, and other civil liberties interests,” the letter added”

BUT, if it’s NECESSARY to infringe on free speech, privacy, and other civil liberties interests, ANYTHING GOES.

I dream for the days when public hangings for treason becomes common place, with fairness and legal authority of course.


25 posted on 06/26/2010 10:40:44 AM PDT by Gator113 (OBAMA IS NOT SUSTAINABLE.. IMPEACH OBAMA NOW..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance; All

Good.

As a U.S. citizen I do not live in the U.S., but was out in the streets against Noriega. Now it is your turn. But it will never happen because you are a bunch of chickens.

Where have you been against Obama but hiding under you beds. You have done nothing, nothing but complain and whine… doing nothing.

Do you think the blue helmets are going to save your asses?

Thank you for giving my country away because of your lack of spine but are talented in whining.

I would really like to say “go to hell” to all of you spineless creeps, but Obama is doing it for me.


26 posted on 06/26/2010 10:43:00 AM PDT by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
Definition of "Cyber Attack" is?

( Conservatives Organizing to Defeat Obama in the next election cycle.Fascism on the rise.)

33 posted on 06/26/2010 10:49:51 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama .......yes.......is a fascist... ...He meets every diagnostic of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

If we had any real journalists in this country the quesioned would be asked: “Why would you need to shut down communication during an attack? Wouldn’t just the opposite be better?”


36 posted on 06/26/2010 10:53:39 AM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

btt


37 posted on 06/26/2010 10:55:08 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
A centralized security strategy or apparatus will be easier to compromise by either brute force, or covert actions. A layered, distributed, heterogeneous, and decentralized approach - based on private, competitive solutions - is better.

An independent, descriptive standards body - staffed with real-world professional experts - would do a much better job at strengthening our systems then a guberment operated bureaucracy that mandates prescriptive measures and technologies that is then communicated outward to private organizations. Where's the secrecy or mystery in that approach? If gubermint defines it (who, what, how, when, where), mandates its use (everyone does it the same way with the same technologies), and publishes it in laws or operating procedures that can be reviewed by enemies? How is that better than being descriptive and letting each company choose the best way to accomplish the goals?

Why not let the industries work to define what things need to be secured and how far the organizations must go to secure their systems based on their role in the nation's infrastructure (e.g. Tier 1 ISP Network Admins who manage firewalls must have background checks every year and be certified to a certain security level) - then let each company implement the best solution for them that meets or exceeds the goals? The over arching standards and goals could be reviewed and approved by the proper agency experts within Homeland Security, but the actual detailed implementations would be left to each company.

42 posted on 06/26/2010 11:00:14 AM PDT by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
A US Senate committee has approved a wide-ranging cybersecurity bill that some critics have suggested would give the US president the authority to shut down parts of the Internet during a cyberattack.

Read Glenn Beck's The Overton Window for a clear explanation of how this works.

46 posted on 06/26/2010 11:24:21 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Once the Ocommie purges begin, the government doesn’t want details of this reported through that pesky internet. They know they can get newspapers and television to censor such reports but that danged internet is so unregulated.


47 posted on 06/26/2010 11:32:50 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Why put limits on this presidents power he will just ignore it anyway?


48 posted on 06/26/2010 11:43:06 AM PDT by Americanexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson