Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Proof in New Black Panther Case: Official (No Evidence Supports Charges by Right-Wingers)
CBS News ^ | 7/25/10 | David S Morgan

Posted on 07/25/2010 10:53:20 AM PDT by Libloather

No Proof in New Black Panther Case: Official
Says No Evidence Supports Charges by Right-Wingers That Obama Admin. Refuses to Prosecute Blacks for Breaking Vote Laws
By David S Morgan
WASHINGTON, July 25, 2010

(CBS) A Bush appointee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights denounced allegations by some pundits that the Justice Department is refusing to pursue a voting rights case against members of the New Black Panther Party because of race, and suggested that the charges being made by right-wing figures are politically motivated.

Conservative broadcasters and websites have claimed that the Obama administration is dropping prosecution of New Black Panther activists who were videotaped outside a Philadelphia polling station on Election Day 2008, making intimidating remarks; one man was carrying a nightstick.

Earlier this month former Justice Department lawyer and Republican activist J. Christian Adams testified to the commission that senior officials in the department are not applying voting rights laws in a race-neutral way, by refusing to press charges against African Americans on these issues.

A recent Media Matters investigation has debunked charges that the Obama administration withdrew criminal charges against the Panthers (in fact, the Bush administration decided not to pursue criminal charges, with Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez testifying that the Bush Justice Department "determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes"; a civil lawsuit was filed in the last days of the Bush administration, and a judgment won by the Obama Justice Department in May 2009).

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: black; elections; evidence; mediamatterslies; nbpp; obama; panther; panthers; proof; voting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-162 next last
To: Libloather

>>suggested that the charges being made by right-wing figures are politically motivated.

Dear MSNBC,

They.Were.Intimidating.Voters!

Of course, its political. They weren’t stealing hubcaps. It’s a political crime, you idiots!


61 posted on 07/25/2010 12:14:49 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Obama is like a rocket scientist....who's trying to do brain surgery with a hammer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U
They should have come out screaming if that happened.

then they would have become targets of their own neighbors.

62 posted on 07/25/2010 12:15:46 PM PDT by digger48 (and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The New Panthers would be happy to tell Ms. Thernstrom they’re proud of their comrades struggle against The Man. However, the NBPP law team, though down with the struggle (fist in the air), strongly caution the NBPP to remain silent. We clear, ayeet.


63 posted on 07/25/2010 12:16:50 PM PDT by egannacht (Inalienable rights granted by...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Then so be it. If we’re afraid, then we’re lost.


64 posted on 07/25/2010 12:17:20 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS... taxes, pain and slow death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma

Can this ditzy lady explain why the DOJ even got a temporary court injunction against them doing the same thing? If there’s nothing wrong with it at all?


65 posted on 07/25/2010 12:17:21 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Am I missing something? Isn’t the article saying that there’s no evidence that the Obama administration tried to stop an investigation? Everyone here seems to think that the article says there’s no evidence that the New Black Panthers tried to intimidate voters.


66 posted on 07/25/2010 12:28:27 PM PDT by cantfindagoodscreenname (One man's tingle is another man's chill...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
NOVEMBER
67 posted on 07/25/2010 12:38:12 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Remember when Communists took over the entertainment industry (Hollywood) and many government offices, and even though McCarthy proved it, the communists kept insisting there was no such thing as communists?

Joseph McCarthy was a hero. Had enough listened to him, the country would be far freer today.

68 posted on 07/25/2010 12:45:44 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cantfindagoodscreenname
Isn’t the article saying that there’s no evidence that the Obama administration tried to stop an investigation?

Thernstrom is arguing that the "small potatoes" case was dropped NOT because of any formal Justice Dept. policy protecting blacks over whites but because there was "no direct evidence that they (the uniformed, weapon wielding black panthers) actually intimidated anyone."

Some of us here believe the video and the words of eye-witness Bartle Bull and others indicate obvious and egregious intimidation and would like to know exactly why the case was dropped.

69 posted on 07/25/2010 1:04:06 PM PDT by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian-American_Civil_Rights_League

It was a movement there for a while, until Joseph Colombo, its founder, was assassinated.


70 posted on 07/25/2010 1:10:49 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

They need to fire this white cracker and install Saint Sherrod into this important racialist position!!


71 posted on 07/25/2010 1:23:58 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dgkb

So, I guess the KKK will now be able to stand at voting sites with clubs and it will be OK with Hussein Obama and his racist attorney general.


72 posted on 07/25/2010 1:26:02 PM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Remember these folks are desperate, they know that November 2, 2010 will be a MAJOR political tsunmmi.


73 posted on 07/25/2010 1:26:54 PM PDT by Biggirl (AZ Is DOING THE JOB The Feds Should Be Doing, ENFORCING The Southern Border! =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma

Maybe I should have read further. I only read what was posted on FR, so my bad, I guess. Thanks! I agree with you that there is plenty of evidence that there was voter intimidation going on, by the way.


74 posted on 07/25/2010 1:35:36 PM PDT by cantfindagoodscreenname (One man's tingle is another man's chill...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
I think a lot of 'crackers' will be leaving the Democrat Party where they no longer feel welcome. I also think they are getting fed up with this hypersensitivity to race and they are sick and tired of the Dem Party and the Media ignoring or downplaying serious race based crimes and focusing on non-existent 'karl rove/tea party/Repubs/whites are racist crap.

This story by CBS is the opposite of helping.

75 posted on 07/25/2010 1:39:12 PM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Typical political bull$hit. Whitewash of the Black Panthers.

Also this reminder..

CAUTION!!!

WWE_EVENT_sml

For those that may not get the point.

In the WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment) every match has a GOOD guy character(s) and a BAD guy character(s)... however, they ALL work directly for the WWE and are helping to put on the show just for YOU.

ALL WWE Events are SCRIPTED in ADVANCE.

76 posted on 07/25/2010 1:40:00 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Never mind what you saw on the damned TAPE! You’re supposed to believe what I SAY!!!!


77 posted on 07/25/2010 1:46:09 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Thank God, Media Matters, and cBS, for that matter, don’t have a dog in this hunt! /heavy, heavy sarcasm


78 posted on 07/25/2010 1:47:32 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (I miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

“No evidence....” OK we will believe you and not our own eyes. Sorry, but we have SEEN the tape.


79 posted on 07/25/2010 1:54:51 PM PDT by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Deflect, project, and blame. Lather, rinse, repeat....


80 posted on 07/25/2010 2:02:50 PM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson