What we know for sure that makes aka Obama ineligible

pravda.ru ^ | Sept. 20, 2010

[Political Junkie Too]

OK, there's more.

In the same story I linked to in my first post (did you actually read the article?), there is also the story of another child who was with Obama for several years of schooling. His photo is below.

As the kindergartner grows into an elementary school child in Hawaii, he begins to look more and more like the Obama that we saw in the Christmastime airport photo, and as a teen and as Obama of today. Yes?

And yet, for you it is unreasonable to reserve judgement on the matter when the only evidence is a second hand report of an unlikely event by habitual liars.

This stuff has been out there for years. Why am I doing your research for you. Your own intransigence is not a shield to be used against others. Maybe the dissonance is elsewhere?

Go figure.

Yeah.

-PJ

[Snuph]

Where are all the old Girlfriends? Ever see anyone become famous and all the old lovers come out of the woodwork?

WHERE ARE ALL THE OLD GIRLFRIENDS?

[jamese777]

Where are all the old Girlfriends? Ever see anyone become famous and all the old lovers come out of the woodwork?

WHERE ARE ALL THE OLD GIRLFRIENDS?

---

When you raise three quarters of a billion dollars for your campaign, you pay old girlfriendsn off (and anyone else with potentially damaging information) and you have them sign non-disclosure agreements that don’t give them the second half of the payment until well after you are out of office.

[38special]

Something’s afoot, I don’t know what is but it’s scary.

[Snuph]

Interesting theory, hasn't seemed to work for any other president however Clinton, Bush II, etc.

[mo]

The sooner people stop worrying about “eligibility” and start pursuing “fraud” ...as in the DNC raising 650 million for a “fraudulently” certified candidate, the sooner we’ll eventually all see a birth certificate.
The law for fraud doesn’t need definition, nor is it pioneering legal theory and activity.

The courts can demand he put out if enough money files claims for fraud.

[FreeperDoll]

lmao..touche..do i smell troll?

[meadsjn]

Funny, the only candidates getting any real opposition from the media, the Democrats, and the liberal wing of the Republican Party, are the candidates who are Constitutional conservatives.

[353FMG]

I’m rooting for you — how I hope you’re right. And even if they have to throw ex-presidents, judges and Congressmen in jail, so be it. I shall welcome the sound of those prison doors shutting behind them.

[naturalborn]

I thought his old girfriends name was Larry?

[jamese777]

Interesting theory, hasn’t seemed to work for any other president however Clinton, Bush II, etc.

---

Has it worked thus far for Barack Obama, Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod?
Perhaps the price has been right for the current administration, making them an offer they couldn’t refuse.

[jamese777]

The sooner people stop worrying about “eligibility” and start pursuing “fraud” ...as in the DNC raising 650 million for a “fraudulently” certified candidate, the sooner we’ll eventually all see a birth certificate.
The law for fraud doesn’t need definition, nor is it pioneering legal theory and activity.

The courts can demand he put out if enough money files claims for fraud.

---

It has surprised me that no prosecuting attorney has pursued a Grand Jury investigation for fraud which would allow subpoenas of documents and compel witnesses to testify under oath.

Watergate had a grand jury; Iran-Contra had a grand jury; Whitewater had a grand jury; CIA leaks-Valerie Plame had a grand jury. Why no Obama eligibility grand jury in a state with a conservative state Attorney General?

[dsc]

“This stuff has been out there for years.”

I’ve been keeping up as best I can, but this is the first time I have seen those photos. I don’t know where “out there” is, but I’m not going to apologize for an inability to absorb all the information that is available today.

When, by the way, did you come across those photos?

“Why am I doing your research for you.”

When a person gives some very good reasons that the evidence presented at a given point in time is not persuasive, it is incumbent upon the person making the assertion to present additional facts or argument...or to take his ball and go home.

You’re not doing my research, you’re arguing your own position.

“Your own intransigence is not a shield to be used against others.”

Do what? (Mirth) Once again, I gave some good reasons that the newspaper article is not persuasive. That is hardly intransigence.

“Maybe the dissonance is elsewhere?”

Nah.

[PA-RIVER]

I guess we have to wait and see where in Kenya his statue is erected after he leaves office In 2012.

[Genoa]

Next to the Telegraph, Pravda is getting to be a favorite paper. Strange days.

[Genoa]

That’s him. See the self-satisfied smirk?

[Beckwith]

Look familiar?

http://theobamafile.com/ObamaEducation.htm#LostKinderRecords

[Forty-Niner]

“
He is not qualified PERIOD !!!!”

Correction......

He is not eligible PERIOD !!!!

The Constitution spells out eligibility requirements.....there are no pr-requisite qualifications.

I apologize for being a nit picker. My only excuse is that we, as Conservatives, need to learn how to control the language of political discussion, be consistent in our word usage, and call the left on the use of their prejorative catch phrases...

At any rate, most former Presidents have said that nothing in their lives could have prepared them for the awesome responsibilities of the Presidency.

The Founders spelled out very simple and seemly easy to meet eligibility requirements.......

Be born in country to citizen parents......

Be at least 35 years old.....

Lived, as an adult, a minimun of 14 years in the USA.

A vast majority of American citizens could meet these simple eligibility requirements......

That Obama, who fails to meet these simple requirements was allowed to assume the office of POTUS has me left in flabbergasted confusion......(I’d lololol, but it isn’t a bit funny!)

Throw out the Dems in Congress, purge the RINOs, and remove the Usurper in Chief!

[Snuph]

agreed

[MileHi]

Smells like it to me!