Yes, it is true. Posted on 09/23/2010 1:29:27 PM PDT by unspun
Yes, it is true.
You may read this September, 2010 report, courtesy of our Freedom of Information Act, at cia.gov.
Since the bulk of what this report discusses apparently has to do with international cooperation, why then, did they not choose that apparently appropriate phrase, instead of "Global Governance"?
"Global Governance" - in case you need to recheck your eyes and mind.
Here is an interesting and self-conflicted disclaimer, from its "Introduction," page 1:
The term “global governance” as used in this paper includes all the institutions, regimes, processes, partnerships, and networks that contribute to collective action and problem solving at the international level. This definition subsumes formal and informal arrangements as well as the role of nonstate actors in transnational settings. Regional cooperation may also be regarded as an element of global governance insofar as it contributes to broader efforts. Governance differs from government, which implies sovereign prerogatives and hierarchical authority. Global governance does not equate to world government, which would be virtually impossible for the foreseeable future, if ever.Are you saying, under your breath, "'Governance differs from government.... Global governance does not equate to world government....' Who are they trying to kid?"
How can any set of people practice governance when there is no effort of government in effect? Clearly, they wish to establish dependable, and enforceable arrangements, coordinated and administered between nations, hence their admission to the word "governance," even though they create the distinction without a difference, between that word and "government."
It is a natural and logical fact that if "global governance" is coordinated effectively, it must be done through an coordinating entity of some kind. But, we must not call that body any kind of "government" -- is what they are saying.
And what is any difference again between the nouns-turned-adjectives, used in these terms? How exactly does "globe" differ from "world," o United States’ National Intelligence Council (NIC) and European Union’s Institute for Security Studies (EUISS)? What color is the sky in your world, er, globe?
So, reader, is there a beacon flashing in your mind, "Orwellian. Orwellian. Orwellian...?" The term "global governance" may also be though of as an Hegelian (and Marxist) compromise, between thesis: international cooperation and antithesis: world government. For those that would like a summary of Hegelian philosophy and it's implications for Karl Marx, it is a way of establishing revolution, plus a way of observing reality, then arguing impossibility, and then influencing people to believe they can "progress" by a gradual step toward the unreal and impossible.
A bias for "world government" is apparent in this conflicted pseudodisclaimer, or they would not have admitted (as if forlornly kicking the dust with one shoe, hands in pockets) that "world government... would be virtually impossible for the foreseeable future, if ever."
Your Sovereign expenditure of tax dollars at work, Sovereign Americans.
Exactly what entities orchestrated this? Only the present US administration and that of the EU (which, by the way, are called "governments")? The major CFR, Bilder, Trilateralist, mega-financier, Marxist, fascist, and globalist movers and shakers down? All, likely, of the above? (Much of that list is redundant.) Any others?
And, if this is what is published, what associated intentions, plans, and implications are they holding back, as objectives for their (our) 2025 benchmark/deadline?
More to be published about this -- including more excerpts -- added to this Gulag Bound article, after further research.
h/t @PatriotWatchdog
Palin also supports amnesty for illegal aliens aka McCain’s plan. the only difference is that McCain calls for regulation of illegals and Palin calls for registration.
In 1999, the UN had a millenium plan posted on the web. It was all about their plans for world government through the UN. I printed it off and filed the hard copy away as proof just in case. Sure enough a little while later it was gone.
“President Palin will terminate this globalism movement and hopefully kick the UN out of this country.”
In your wet dream.
Sorry, but she may try but it will eventually happen anyway.
We are on the verge of economic collapse. It will quickly devolve into lawlessness and anarchy. If it were just the US, or China, or the EU, I would say you are correct, but I believe with the enormity of the crisis, world wide, there will be a long period of “every man for himself” attitude. Nationally, we will have the balkanization of the United States, and the same in the EU. I believe that with the collapse of the EU, we will see a dramatic rise in nationalism. I’m not saying patriotism. I’m saying a survival mentality not only because of the world economy, but because of out of control immigration.
Look at European cities under siege by Islamics. They are living in gettoes inslaved to social programs, and uneducated. There’ll be a total breakdown of their society, their families, their rules. Not even the mosque will hold them together. They will not be governed.
I do not believe history is cyclical. We are traveling on a straight line through time. I am not a prophecy freak expecting to be raptured out of here before my electric blanket goes on the blink. I do not know God’s mind, but I do believe He is in control of our times.
Thank you for posting the link to Palin’s supporting of LOST...and also mentioning her support of Illegal Aliens (which is part of the Open Borders Globalist agenda).
Palin is part of the problem, not part of the solution, to ever encroaching Globalism
Hear, hear. She's the only potential presidential contender with the testicular fortitude to take the revolutionary steps necessary to save this country, at this point.
One proof of this, is that she has all the right enemies. Sarah IS the one.
“President Palin will terminate this globalism movement and hopefully kick the UN out of this country.”
You don’t really believe that do you?
Break out the probe!!!
I wonder if,, in light of the current SB1070 in Arizona, she still feels that way. Somehow, I doubt it. I hope!
so right!
He was suppose to urge the Agenda 21 format be advanced at the UN.
It’s funny to me that people cite Orwell re: One World Govt. How about the book that FIRST prophesied it... Revelation.
That has to end.
Also subversion of the G.O.P. by the globalist U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Managed Funds Association has to end.
Or, conservatives will simply have to leave, for a new First Party.
THX THX.
END TIMES LIST, UFO PING LIST, CONSULTANTS LIST . . .
THIS THREAD HAS SEVERAL GOOD POSTS AND LINKS BEGINNING WITH THE OP (ORIGINAL POST)
Please consider reading what you have time to bother with.
BTW, you may be rather certain that the UFO phenomena and technologies as well as the critters WILL BE playing key roles in all such global tyrannies.
Time will tell if the naysayers to such tons of evidence stacked so high now will be derisive and haughtily laughing on their ways to the guillotines.
Sorry, I’m not tracking your hint.
Thanks for your kind ping.
QUITE SO. QUITE SO.
Your assessment is quite behind the times.
Our sovereignty was shredded a long time ago . . . and more shredding has been going at break-neck speed under OThuga.
He is, after all, merely the current Destroyer in Chief public stooge of these blokes:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2475963/posts?page=60#60
“2025 Global Trends Final Report”
http://www.dni.gov/nic/PDF_2025/2025_Global_Trends_Final_Report.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.