Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jewish Week: Sarah Palin is Right--We're Looking at a Blood Libel
Jewish Week ^ | Wednesday, January 12, 2011 | Jonathan Mark

Posted on 01/12/2011 1:15:06 PM PST by kristinn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: wtc911

You may find this relevant to your interests.


41 posted on 01/12/2011 3:14:22 PM PST by ExGeeEye (Freedom is saying "No!" to the Feds, and getting away with it. "Speak 'NO' to Power!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I’ve loved Palin since I first saw here and I can say tonight that I’ve never been more proud of her. Testify, Sarah!


42 posted on 01/12/2011 3:18:55 PM PST by fkabuckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExGeeEye; wtc911
He never responded to my quote from Dershowitz earlier on another thread.

He's in the twilight zone insofar as Palin is concerned. PDS can make even sane people clueless, just look what it's doing to the marginally sane democrat/media complex.

First she's at fault this non political sicko shoots these people, then when she responds to the insanity, that's her fault too.

43 posted on 01/12/2011 3:19:46 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
I think Sarah Palin chose those words carefully, first because they were accurate and directly to the point and secondly because she knew the MSM would go apoplectic.

She did a rhetorical rope-a-dope on them. I think she knew this would make them hysterical, and keep the story going at a time when the facts are coming out against them and they would otherwise want to let the story die.

44 posted on 01/12/2011 3:20:54 PM PST by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mancini

She kicked over a few tables with whip in hand.


45 posted on 01/12/2011 3:22:16 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; ...

Thanks kristinn.
As Jon Stewart pointed out, blaming talk radio for the Tucson killer is like blaming hard rock radio for the Columbine killers... Sarah Palin is right. She is being slandered. Nothing reflects the vulgarity of the national conversation over the past few years more than the relentless "hating" of Sara Palin, particularly in the Jewish community, particularly those Jews who flatter themselves as being tolerant, as masters of civility.

46 posted on 01/12/2011 3:23:27 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark; ExGeeEye; EveningStar
Number 1, I don't owe you or anyone else a reply. Nobody here does.

Number 2, I form my own opinions (imagine that). I don't need anyone from the left or the right telling me what to think or validating my conclusions.

My point was that the use of the phrase was stupid because it would, predictably, allow the left to re-frame the discussion around those two words and ignore the rest of her three page statement.

The very fact that Dershowitz is "defending" palin's use of blood libel just proves my point.

47 posted on 01/12/2011 3:25:25 PM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625; P-Marlowe
I also think the MSM is anxious to report anything that will deflect from the lousy economy we've had since the Dems won control of Congress.
48 posted on 01/12/2011 3:25:50 PM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (Compassionate Conservatism? Promoting self reliance is compassionate. Promoting dependency is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
I find it interesting that not one Media Outlet has mentioned Pelosi calling the massacre a "tragic accident", yet they are all over themselves trying to condemn Palin for calling the attempt to blame her for the massacre a "blood libel".

Palin will win this war. She has the entire MSM outgunned.

49 posted on 01/12/2011 3:33:42 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
The very fact that Dershowitz is "defending" palin's use of blood libel just proves my point.

*Ponders the utter stupidity of that statement*

You know, virtually every conservative commentator has come not only to her defense, but strongly so, and with well reasoned points. Krauthammer, the guys from Powerline, Glenn Reynolds (libertarian), Michelle Malkin, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, there is virtually no one on the conservative side that is not ridiculing the MSM or defending her for her use of the words "blood libel".

Even libs such as Jonathan Chait are defending the use.

Go suck some lemons somewhere else please, you don't "think for yourself", your PDS is just driving you insane.

It must not be fun to be such a jerk.

50 posted on 01/12/2011 3:36:27 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mancini
.

Sooner or later these MSM types will finally figure-out that messing with Sarah Palin is a "losing proposition" ...


But you can't really blame the MSM ... and I'm being serious ...

How MANY GOP-Conservatives have been attached by the MSM in the past ... and the "brave" republicans ran-away like the French Army from the Nazis ?

The MSM just assumed that Sarah was just like Bob Dole, George Bush (1 and 2), Karl Rove ... et al ...


BOY ! were they ever wrong !!!

Finally, a Conservative with balls ...


.
51 posted on 01/12/2011 3:41:33 PM PST by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Typical response from you...all invective, zero facts, less logic. Precisely why I more often than not will not respond to you.


52 posted on 01/12/2011 3:44:06 PM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark; ExGeeEye; wtc911
I respect wtc911's opinion. Thinking people don't agree 100%.

Ed Koch: “If you agree with me on nine out of 12 issues, vote for me. If you agree with me on 12 out of 12 issues, see a psychiatrist.”

BTW, wtc911 is one of FR's finest.

53 posted on 01/12/2011 3:51:37 PM PST by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I can just hear the hew and cry now the next time someone uses the phrase “killing fields” to describe the mass murder of non-Laotians. /s


54 posted on 01/12/2011 3:55:02 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I agree that she knew what she was saying. I also thought she made a mistake doing so.

I haven’t renounced that position yet, but there’s been a lot written today that has softened my stance. I was surprised to find so many references to blood libel in recent and past political speeches and comments — these didn’t pop up in a google search, but I guess because it was overwhelmed by current links. (also I am not above suspecting Google of trying to push the left’s desired hits to the top of the list).

Who knows, by the weekend I may have changed my mind, and decided that it was a good phrase to use. But I’ve never doubted that Sarah Palin knew exactly what it meant, and used it purposely. I simply couldn’t figure out what her purpose was.


55 posted on 01/12/2011 3:58:37 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Yep, as National Review said today....the PDSers are in a frenzie!


56 posted on 01/12/2011 4:04:10 PM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
Actually, it was filled with facts and logic, you just can't handle them because you'e so thin skinned. It's simple, the vaswt majority of thoughtful conservative commentators are backing her on this point, and you don't.

You spent most of your day whining (and repeating your whining ad nauseum) about two words from a very fine speech; two words that absolutely have now defined the debate on what the MSM has tried to do with her.

Much like "death panels" has become a simple concise way to understand Obamacare, "blood libel" is now going to be used as how the MSM has dealt with this tragedy.

Get over yourself, you had a bad day.

57 posted on 01/12/2011 4:05:32 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Thankfully, just a couple of them are here on FR........the noisy, bellicose and thin skinned handful of crazies.

It's unbelievable the nonsense they spew.

*Whiny voice* Sarah Palin said "blood libel", oh how horrible........

58 posted on 01/12/2011 4:10:25 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I love that song...”and the cat’s on the keyboard and the silver spoon, little boy blue and the man in the moon...


59 posted on 01/12/2011 4:14:12 PM PST by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
I respect wtc911's opinion

I don't know much about his posts, rarely have noticed them. In this instance, all he has is his opinion (a very lonely one on the conservative side it seems), and it's not a very good one, not one that seems respectable or filled with facts as he seems to think.

I understand your Koch quote, but in this case, wtc has simply lost it.

60 posted on 01/12/2011 4:15:56 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson