Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawaii Ground Report: ( Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. Legally Barry Soetoro
The HillBuzz ^ | 1/23/2011 6:52:06 AM | Kevin DuJan

Posted on 01/23/2011 5:20:33 AM PST by TexasCajun

HAWAII GROUND REPORT: Could Hawaiian Governor Neil Abercrombie not be as incompetent and foolish as he appears, but orchestrating a deliberate birth certificate recovery dead end to cover his own papakole? UPDATED: Mystery solved! Reason Obama will not release birth certificate is because his name is legally written “Barry Soetoro” on it

Here’s an interesting Ground Report from Hawaii that contains an ingenious theory about Hawaiian Governor Neil Abercrombie’s bizarre backtrack on releasing Obama’s birth certificate.

Remember, Abercrombie promised that once he was elected Governor he would prove Obama’s birth certificate existed because he would march down to the Hall of Records and demand its production from the archives…and he would then hold it aloft in the gentle Hawaiian breeze, high above his balding pate, for all the world to see, thereby producing the document Obama has spent millions to keep hidden.

(Excerpt) Read more at hillbuzz.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: barrysoetoro; birthcertificate; certifigate; coverup; crime; crimes; dunham; eligibility; foreignaidfruad; fraud; hawaii; identityfruad; illegal; kurtz; lawlicense; naturalborncitizen; obama; soetoro; whosauntzeituni; whosyourmommy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 861-873 next last
To: humblegunner

You said it better and more concisely than I was going to say it. Well done.


21 posted on 01/23/2011 5:45:28 AM PST by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

It is common, in many states, to reach back onto the birth certificates, to change a name on a birth certificate. From the birth name to the adopted name, and behave as the original name never existed.

I’m no fan of this, mind you, but this is done in a lot of the states and has been for many years.

So yes, a birth certificate from the sixties would reflect an adoption (thus a name change) into the seventies.

Go ahead and look it up. It’s no joke.


22 posted on 01/23/2011 5:45:39 AM PST by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

“So a birth certificate from the sixties would reflect a name change from the seventies.”

Yes, actually that is what happens. When there is an adoption, the original is sealed and the birth certificate is reissued as a birth registration with the new parent(s) listed... at least that’s what happened in Michigan to me back in the late 50’s when my mother remarried after my father’s death and my stepfather adopted us... don’t know about Hawaii.


23 posted on 01/23/2011 5:45:44 AM PST by Aunt Polgara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

There is a reason why his origins are obscure/mysterious.


24 posted on 01/23/2011 5:53:13 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

I think this is it (the correct theory)...in many respects no big deal....the kid was adopted by a foreigner ...but politically and technically its a mess


25 posted on 01/23/2011 5:53:32 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Reason Obama will not release birth certificate is because his name is legally written “Barry Soetoro” on it

And, if so, Barry is guilty of violating the law when he swore that he had never had or been known by any other name than Barack Hussein Obama.
26 posted on 01/23/2011 5:53:40 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biggredd1; Fred Nerks; LucyT; STARWISE; onyx; muawiyah; MestaMachine; little jeremiah; Candor7; ...
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/01/o-con-had-legal-help-from-non-partisan.html

Yep.

I'd also like to know if there were ever any pre-2007 postings anywhere online mentioning anything about "original" birth certificates of adoptees.

27 posted on 01/23/2011 5:54:13 AM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

The original BC could be under ‘Dunham,’ and only if reckless Ann Dunham declared the Indonesian adoption to HI officials did the HI BC get changed.


28 posted on 01/23/2011 5:54:13 AM PST by esquirette ("Our hearts are restless until they find rest in Thee." ~ Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie
This is not a case of a child being given up by both his biological parents and his custody being transferred to two non-biologically-related parents.

His biological mother retained custody throughout.

Birth certificates are sealed only in closed adoptions.

29 posted on 01/23/2011 5:55:11 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: esquirette; All
What was that weird story about a Steve Dunham that came out a year or so ago, was that a complete hoax?
30 posted on 01/23/2011 5:55:49 AM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Interesting.

Thank you.

31 posted on 01/23/2011 5:56:47 AM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mercat
I’ve done a few step parent adoptions and also we have an adopted daughter. Her birth certificate shows me and Mr. Mercat as her parents. There’s no mention of her birth parents or of her having been adopted. And her name is A.I. Mercat (not really but you get the drift) with no mention of her birth name. And since Mr. Mercat and I were not anywhere near her birthplace which is still accurate, its a bit weird but there it is.

That's interesting. But, that doesn't tell me whether the original certificate exists in the filing system, or if there is a link or reference to it in the filing system. It's hard to believe that the original records, or any link to them, would simply be destroyed.

32 posted on 01/23/2011 5:57:03 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine (/s, in case you need to ask)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Aunt Polgara; wideawake

Freeper Aunt Polgara’s original BC was sealed when her mom married and her husband adopted her children.


33 posted on 01/23/2011 5:58:49 AM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Aunt Polgara

So is the orginal sealed to where even you as the individual whose name was changed can’t see it?

In any case regarding Obama he’s refused to release any BC original or revised to reflect an adoption. I think that is the greater point of this matter.


34 posted on 01/23/2011 6:00:24 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
The original documents are not destroyed.

They are SEALED.

They can't be accessed, except by a court order, and then the (physical) seals are broken.

35 posted on 01/23/2011 6:00:34 AM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Thanks for clearing that up.

Interesting that Hawaii has a convenient little law barring BCs to be made public, if that person doesn’t give said permission. When did they enact this law and why?

I think an entire country has a “right” to see the BC, whether Barry gives his permission or not!


36 posted on 01/23/2011 6:00:45 AM PST by Galtoid ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: deport

A legally sealed document can ONLY be unsealed by court order.


37 posted on 01/23/2011 6:01:36 AM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie
I do not understand why people keep harping on the Original Long Form BC, as that would have been permanently sealed by the family court conducting the adoption.

So, would the short form with the new name that he did submit for public view be a total fraud in the case where the original has not been amended with new latest/greatest legal name?

38 posted on 01/23/2011 6:02:12 AM PST by Publius Maximus (God, please let 2012 come quickly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie

Correct! We adopted two boys, one in Texas and one in Florida. In both cases, we were given a new birth certificate with my wife and I as the parents. The originals are still on file. The information can only be retreived by court order, for just cause.

BTW, since he has not LEGALLY changed his name and he signs everything 0bambi, anything he signs is a fraudulent document and is therefore, null and void.


39 posted on 01/23/2011 6:02:34 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69
then why doesn't the governor of Hawaii say so? He could just say ‘He was legally adopted by Soretero and so his birth certificate has been legally changed to reflect that’? Instead of fumbling around saying he can't find it or access it?
40 posted on 01/23/2011 6:03:48 AM PST by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 861-873 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson