Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gates, Rumsfeld Sued Over U.S. Military's Rape Epidemic
Yahoo News ^ | 15Feb2011 | Jesse Ellison

Posted on 02/15/2011 8:17:11 AM PST by ConorMacNessa

A landmark lawsuit filed Tuesday against Defense Secretary Robert Gates and his predecessor, Donald Rumsfeld, alleges that the military's repeated failures to take action in rape cases created a culture where violence against women was tolerated, violating the plaintiffs’ Constitutional rights.

“There are three types of women in the Army,” says Rebecca Havrilla, a former sergeant and explosive-ordnance-disposal technician. “Bitch, dyke, and whore.” During the four years that Havrilla was on active duty, she was called all three—by fellow soldiers, team leaders, even unit commanders. Once, during a sexual-assault prevention training, the 28-year-old South Carolina native claims, she watched a fellow soldier—male—strip naked and dance on top of a table as the rest of the team laughed. While deployed in Afghanistan, Havrilla spent four months working under a man she alleges bit her neck, pulled her into his bed, and grabbed her butt and waist—on a daily basis. When, on the last day of her deployment, she alleges she was raped by a soldier she considered a friend, it was, she says, “the icing on the cake.”

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gates; military; rape; rumsfeld; sexualassault
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Louis Foxwell
Uniformed ladies are fair game for the troops,

Are you serious? Really?

Think that attitude would fly in any corporation?

What an idiot.

41 posted on 02/15/2011 9:13:04 AM PST by Wizdum (Wisdom is what you gain when things go wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Really, supporting the rape of servicewomen? That is contemptible.


42 posted on 02/15/2011 9:15:14 AM PST by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass

Imagine the environment in a unit with homo commanders & sncos.

Someone else said it - we ain’t seen nothing yet...


43 posted on 02/15/2011 9:19:07 AM PST by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

There is, of course, a fairly easy way to fix this. It’s just not politically correct, so won’t be done.


44 posted on 02/15/2011 9:23:46 AM PST by chesley (Eat what you want, and die like a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

If men took pride in being a “gentleman”, and women took pride in being a “lady”, there would be a lot less of this stuff going on.


45 posted on 02/15/2011 9:25:50 AM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

Just another argument to return to a traditional, non-socially-engineered military - strictly honorable men under arms. And those rapists and abusers should be drummed out. If that’s how they treat American woman, they shouldn’t be anywhere near foreign civilian women in a war who at some point might be dependent on American forces.


46 posted on 02/15/2011 9:34:39 AM PST by OldNewYork (social justice isn't justice; it's just socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

Indeed “Can’t pass the smell test”.She had a gun and was trained how to fight and she didn’t make out a report about it?


47 posted on 02/15/2011 9:40:01 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I’ve heard allegations of rape threat by lesbians on straight women.

I guess I'm just naive, but I just can't understand the... uh, mechanics of a lesbian rape of another women. Is there.. uh, extra hardware involved?

48 posted on 02/15/2011 9:57:21 AM PST by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rahbert
Wheres the discipline? In WWII there would be courts martial and the noose for rape.
There is no excuse for this. Warrior ethic, my foot. These are not warriors picking on their female counterparts. These are horndogs with no sense of honor.


Well said. All the justifies and apologists on this thread make me sick. A soldier that can't treat a comrade with respect needs a NOOSE, not an excuse.
49 posted on 02/15/2011 10:03:44 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

If our government, and therefore our military, was not controlled by Globalist Banksters and Cultural Marxists women would not be in the military and rape would be a capital crime. As it is now our military is used as a social engineering experiment and to protect the borders of Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq while our own borders are wide open allowing illegal aliens to kill more Americans then any Muslim terrorist ever did.


50 posted on 02/15/2011 10:11:18 AM PST by Roninf5-1 (If ignorance is bliss why are so many Americans on anti-depressants?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

LMAO, what did they expect?

Now they are going to put women in submarines.

I have a niece in the Air Force, she is a bitch and a Dyke.
covered with tattoo’s.
I don’t think she is a whore.


51 posted on 02/15/2011 10:20:10 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Guess that went right over your head. Supporting the exclusion of women in military combat forces is more to the point.


52 posted on 02/15/2011 10:23:52 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (For love of Sarah, our country and the American Way of Life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

Extra hardware would be the right term, I guess.


53 posted on 02/15/2011 10:47:26 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass
They build up warrior men, then expect them to be docile little puppies around women.

Yes, that seems like backwards thinking. Especially when some female troops hit the bar after work and get $ - - - faced drunk. I've witnessed that firsthand, and had to have a fellow female designated driver take the drunk women home.

One got so drunk one night at a topless bar, she jumped up, pulled her top off and showed the not so well endowed dancer what breasts look like. The bouncer told us to get her and ourselves out of there.

54 posted on 02/15/2011 11:15:50 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (America has two cancers - democrats and RINOS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

No, I read and understood what you wrote. Anyone who supports the rape of US servicewomen by US servicemen has issues.


55 posted on 02/15/2011 11:22:30 AM PST by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
It is not supporting it. It is stating a fact. War brings out a very animalistic side in men. That's why we in the military have to work so hard to instill discipline in our Soldiers to insure they follow the laws of war.

Once you have killed a man or had someone try to kill you rape does not seem like such a big deal. For most of human history when one army conquered another army the raping and pillaging started soon after.

I think for men there is a connection between violence and libido. I would have not thought that until my first deployment and experience it myself. I did not rape anyone but after a firefight there was a strong urge to procreate. Talking to other Soldiers this seems to be common.

56 posted on 02/15/2011 11:31:00 AM PST by armordog99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: Jeff Chandler
Is this a news article? It reads like an introduction to Womyn’s Studies 101.

"Jesse Ellison is a writer and editor for Newsweek..."

'Nuff said ?

58 posted on 02/15/2011 12:31:23 PM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: starlifter

Few people know me better than myself. You are not one of them.


59 posted on 02/15/2011 2:18:46 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (For love of Sarah, our country and the American Way of Life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: thulldud; TankerKC
The word is "infinitesimally", and it doesn't mean "a whole lot more"; it means "practically no more at all."

Thanks for a good catch. See? It taxed my memory. LOL!!

60 posted on 02/15/2011 2:39:57 PM PST by Albion Wilde (Government does nothing as economically as the private sector. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson