‘Climate Scientists’ Release Profane Video Bashing Deniers

theblaze.com ^ | May 11, 2011

[Scanian]

You know they have no argument left when they resort to profanity and obscenity; smears and slander.

I don’t know how they think anybody with more than a 6th grade education could be impressed by such screeds.

Let ‘em rant on-—they’re only defeating themselves.

[rusureitflies?]

Latest Weather Channel Headline 5/11/2011!
GORE’S GLOBAL FLATULAENCE NOW EMITTING PROFANE GAS!
(Not suitable for children)

[PATRIOT1876]

* An accurate measure of the depth of their intellect; personal attacks are a poor substitute for reason, but it’s all they have.*
I’ve noticed again and again in debates with people on the Left, that when they run out of facts, they bring out the tired old Saul Alinsky tool that is like a circus clown gun and has an insult or a dity word on a piece of cloth that comes out instead of “BANG!”

Very, very sad when they stoop this low. My only hope is that there are not that many brainwashed and/or stupid people that believe them.

If the Dems win in 2012, we have officially stepped into the movie “Idiocracy”

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Climate change has been proven. It used to be called “Seasons” until one day Al Gore showed a picture of a mountain in winter covered in snow then the same mountain months later in the midst of summer with most of the snow gone. Liberals, being that most of them are on massve amounts of drugs, walked into walls and each other in a panic wondering how this could happen. Thus was born “Climate change”. Next they are studying how leaves seem to be falling from trees every October-November. They have a theory that pollution may be to blame.

[Eddie01]

Show me the data

oh wait, sorry

[toast]

Climate Scientist.

Without the concept of global warming they are out of a job.
May as well be a typewriter repair man.

[Maceman]

This video sure doesn’t sound like science to me.

[bigbob]

Ah man, they’ve broken the code - THIS is exactly what will bring people to their side by the millions!

Who knew “climate scientists” were such perceptive public relations geniuses?

[LibLieSlayer]

The first clim-o-terrorist that gets in my face and cusses me will see his personal global temperature decrease to room temperature.

LLS

[PATRIOT1876]

Will the climate “Scientists” pull their pants down to their ankles and wear lots of “bling” to appear more believable?

[a fool in paradise]

Rapping “scientist” alert

[Gaffer]

Just because you are a student, grad student, associate or full professor in academia who happens to have written a paper, thesis, book, etc. making claims about the climate drawing unsupportable conclusions with sketchy and/or handpicked data, futher having such "peer-reviewed" by equally environmentally bigoted minds,DOES NOT A CLIMATE SCIENTIST MAKE.

To them, I say here's your challenge, pick a day, any specific day in the next 6 months and tell me what the temperatures will be, weather and conditions within even 5% using your long-term models on which you base your absurd claims. You can't do it.

[Donald Rumsfeld Fan]

behold the modern day "scientest"

[Donald Rumsfeld Fan]

weather and climate are totally different things. climate is always changing.....in that regard they share the same attribute. climate changes over centuries and longer ....weather changes daily and weekly..never confuse the two

[KC Burke]

I have heard a professor of meteorology explain that the term “climate science” or climate scientist is a made up buzz word and carefully explain that meteorology and atmospheric studies were always the actual fields.

It is kind of like the butterfly specialist that has made a career about population growth — dilettantes.

[Gaffer]

So you're saying that these 'models' they've concocted won't work on a reduced time scale? I'd even let them take their data used for 'modeling' back 1 million years if needed.....

So what would make one think they'd work on any time scale? A model is physics-based, or it is algorithmic, non closed-form approximations, manipulations, etc. of empirical data. I contend the empirical data they use is manufactured, filched, cherry picked, etc. and they have no physics based foundation to speak of in short - bullshit.

By equivocating weather vs climate, we excuse the impreciseness of their method and their accuracy, that's all. In the end, at any given instant in their concocted timelines, weather and climate are the same.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks Free ThinkerNY (self-ping for later).

[Free Vulcan]

That’s what did it for me. I’m now totally on board with the Consensus of Man-Made Global Warming. It’s the rapping. Gets me every time. Who can stand before the towering intellect of rapping?

[spodefly]

I once had a conversation with a rabid “global warming” advocate. Her question to me was “Do you deny climate change?”. Of course not, I said ... What I “deny” is that any changes we see are specifically man made and that sweeping changes in government, economies, and society are necessary to “avert disaster” ... man obviously had no influence on the warming that melted the glaciers that created the Great Lakes, and yet it happened, right?

Her reply ended my attempt to ever have another such conversation with the climate hoaxers.

“The Great Lakes were formed by glaciers?”

[Slings and Arrows]

I did NOT watch the video. I can only take so much pain at one time.