Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World Net Daily officially 7th Day Adventist?
July 24, 2011 | Self

Posted on 07/24/2011 6:54:25 AM PDT by AnalogReigns

I just received an email from World Net Daily advertising some books. Not unusual, as I'm on their list, and they send ads all the time. What is strange though, is the fact that all the books in this ad are religious AND take the oddball "7th-day Sabbath" position--definitely a very minority position among conservative evangelicals, and Christians of all stripes.

The ad also hints at some dark conspiracy amidst conventional Christians, accusing us of not reading the bible carefully.

Some evangelical apologists too categorize Adventism (which started with those who firmly predicted Jesus to come again in the 1840s) itself is at least an eccentric sect, following Old Testament and extra-biblical regulations, if not a cult, not unlike many others that got founded about that time.

Is World Net Daily now officially Adventist?


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: adventist; belongsinreligion; cult; notanewstopic; worldnetdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-265 next last
To: AppyPappy

I’m confident that God could have had the prophets write ‘a seventh day’ and not ‘The Seventh day’ if it was His intent on keeping it vague.

Two clues that indicate that He meant it for man, and not just Jew, was the fact that He instituted it at Creation and He also makes it very clear that we will keep it in the New Earth.

You haven’t shown me anything to prove otherwise, other thanstraight up denial. But that’s ok, everybody is welcome to their opinion.


201 posted on 07/25/2011 6:59:44 AM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

I’ve only proven that you base your belief on the consistency of the Jewish practice, not Scripture. The ONLY reason you chose Saturday is because of the Jewish Sabbath.

Which is fine as long as you realize you aren’t standing on holy ground. The Sabbath is what is important (kinda) and not the day itself.


202 posted on 07/25/2011 7:11:31 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

As long as you’re clear that you’re denying the fact that God beat into them which day it was and the fact they’ve been faithful on that point, I’m fine with it. :)


203 posted on 07/25/2011 7:24:48 AM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

“and the fact they’ve been faithful on that point”

You realize that you cannot prove this theory, right? Therefore it isn’t a fact. You simply assume they have been faithful since Moses.


204 posted on 07/25/2011 7:30:41 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Ultimately, by your arguement, nothing can be proven historically, so nothing is valid.

Absolutely nothing.

Prove to me God exists. You can’t, therefore He doesn’t exist. If God doesn’t exist, you don’t need to obey the Bible in anyway. It’s a freeforall.

That is the essence of your arguement. If it cannot be proven, it doesn’t exist.


205 posted on 07/25/2011 7:40:15 AM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

“Prove to me God exists. You can’t, therefore He doesn’t exist. “

Wait. The existence of God solely exists on my ability to prove Him to you?

I’m not sure what to do with this much power but I like it.


206 posted on 07/25/2011 8:11:42 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I’m just pointing out that nothing is provable to the level you’re demanding.

You cannot prove to me that Moses wrote the Torah and you cannot prove to me that the various writers who are credited with writing the various books of the Old Testament.

The oldest, provable, New Testament book can be traced to about 300 AD, so by your defined parameters, the New Testament books must have been written around 300 AD or so, because that is what is provable, so it couldn’t have been Paul and the Apostles that wrote them.

In my books, I can accept the Jews claim that they have always kept the Sabbath from Sinai forward, especially since there is not one credible claim to the contrary. And their keeping of the Sabbath, as given by God, along with the Creation account, along with the fact that it will be kept in the New Earth, and most importantly, Christ kept it Himself. If Christ didn’t know better, nobody does.


207 posted on 07/25/2011 8:30:50 AM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

“You cannot prove to me that Moses wrote the Torah”

Correct that is why the Bible doesn’t say he wrote the Torah. It says that it is believed that he wrote the Torah. That’s what my Bible says.

But you are missing the point. Your claim that the Saturday is based on Scripture is incorrect. The church chose Saturday because the Jews used Saturday. If they had been using Wednesday, you would use Wednesday. The Bible simply says a Seventh day, the Jews currently use Saturday so you use Saturday. Your faith on Saturday is in faithfulness of the Jewish nation throughout history, not the Scripture.

The dietary laws are a lot more concrete.


208 posted on 07/25/2011 8:53:14 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

And you are assuming the Jews chose Saturday, as opposed to having it chosen for them.


209 posted on 07/25/2011 9:12:27 AM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

When referring to the Sabbath, the term, ‘a rest day’ is never used. It is The Rest Day.


210 posted on 07/25/2011 9:15:48 AM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

And by your parameters, the dietary laws are no more concrete, because there’s no guarentee that was was called a pig back then is called a pig today or a rat back then, being a rat today.

By your parameters, what you choose to do, is your choosing. You are your own god.


211 posted on 07/25/2011 9:18:55 AM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

This is an incredibly stupid post!

WND has absolutely nothing to do with Adventists; they simply take the Biblical position on the sabbath, as well as on the Lord’s Feasts.

This is what Christianity was for its first 200 years.


212 posted on 07/25/2011 9:21:31 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Actually, the proposition that "Electricity comes from wall sockets" is NOT an article of faith.

Ouch.

Good point.

Of course I meant that most people behave as if the electric flow magically appears at the socket, with no connection to anything past their own circuit breakers., if they even think it back that far.

I could see half the mouth-breathers who went to my high school taking a microwave and a naked wall outlet from the hardware store camping...

213 posted on 07/25/2011 9:21:34 AM PDT by null and void (Day 915. When your only tools are a Hammer & Sickle, everything looks like a Capitalist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

>> “If one does an in depth study, Easter as we know it is the celebration of the risen Lord” <<

.
A “celebration” that is nowheres to be found in God’s word.

The Passover is what we were commanded to celebrate, and that is exactly what the apostles did. Every time that a “get together” of any kind is mentioned in the NT it is one of the Lord’s feasts; usually Passover.


214 posted on 07/25/2011 9:25:35 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

>> “The term sabbath means rest day, that is all it means.” <<

.
Nonsense and ignorance.

Sabbath means “seventh” or an event that hinges on the completion of seven of something, usually seven sabbaths.

The Lord’s sabbath is still the seventh day of the week, and that was when Christians got together until the Romans took over the church, hundreds of years after Christ ascended.

Paul, a Jew, celebrated the Lord’s commanded feasts, not “important dates within the Jewish calendar.”

We are supposed to do that too, if we love the Lord.


215 posted on 07/25/2011 9:33:22 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Peter from Rutland

>> “Took the words right out of my mouth.” <<

.
What took the brains out of your head?


216 posted on 07/25/2011 9:35:28 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

No.

The root word of sabbath is shabbath, which is Hebrew for rest.

There were two kinds of sabbath, one that represented the various dates in the Hebrew calendar representing important events and the Sabbath, which was kept from Mount Sinai forward as commanded by God.


217 posted on 07/25/2011 9:37:53 AM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: the_daug; Elsie

***So Gentile should force Seventh day Adventist or any other Seventh day Sabbath keeper to observe Sunday then?***

Again you have fallen into the “honoring the day” trap.

Christians DO NOT honor Sunday, we honor the LORD JESUS CHRIST, and CHRISTIANS have been doing so from Pentecost, when the Holy Spirit was poured out on the believers (on a Sunday) till now!


218 posted on 07/25/2011 9:43:59 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name. See my home page, if you dare! NEW PHOTOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1

***Learn to count to three, and so much more will become apparent.***

Look at the chart on #112 again. Now show me what year it was. Does this conform to the dates from the early Christians?

Yes! Either 30AD or 33AD.


219 posted on 07/25/2011 9:51:22 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name. See my home page, if you dare! NEW PHOTOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45; Jonty30

>> “And hence lies your problem. They were invalidated at the Cross. You’re adding to the Scriptures something that isn’t there” <<

.
Not much on the words of Christ, huh?

.
Mat 5:18
“For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.”

.
Did you get that part about Heaven and Earth passing?


220 posted on 07/25/2011 9:53:52 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-265 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson