Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy prepares submarines for 1st female officers
nctimes.com ^ | 29 July 2011 | Michael Melia

Posted on 08/01/2011 9:59:09 PM PDT by smokingfrog

HARTFORD, Conn. ---- For Ensign Peggy LeGrand, the biggest concern about serving on a submarine is not spending weeks at a time in tight quarters with an entirely male crew. What worries her is the scrutiny that comes with breaking one of the last gender barriers in the U.S. military.

"I have a feeling more people will be focused on us. Our mistakes and successes will be magnified more than they deserve," said LeGrand, 25, a Naval Academy graduate from Amarillo, Texas.

LeGrand is among a small group of female officers who are training at sites including Groton, Conn., to join the elite submarine force beginning later this year. While the Navy says it is not treating them any differently from their male counterparts, officials have been working to prepare the submarine crews ---- and the sailors' wives ---- for one of the most dramatic changes in the 111-year history of the Navy's "silent service."

The initial class of 24 women will be divided among four submarines, where they will be outnumbered by men by a ratio of roughly 25 to 1. The enlisted ranks, which make up about 90 percent of a sub's 160-sailor crew, are not open to women ---- although the Navy is exploring modifications to create separate bunks for men and women.

The female officers, many of them engineering graduates from Annapolis, are accustomed to being in the minority, and so far they say they hardly feel like outsiders. The nuclear power school that is part of their training, for example, has been open to women for years because the Navy in 1994 reversed a ban on females serving on its surface ships, including nuclear-powered vessels.

(Excerpt) Read more at nctimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: disorder; feminaziagenda; feminazism; globalforceforgood; ifitfeelsgooddohim; militaryrules; socialexperiment; submarines; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: smokingfrog
I know some women officers who do a good job and deserve everything they achieve. That being said, I am very much against both females and gays in combat units. It doesn't matter what you say, men act differently around women (and I must assume that fags act differently around attractive males). There is no conditioning that can change it.

I worked in an all male unit and one of the most annoying things was when we had an attached unit that allowed females. Without fail (WITHOUT FAIL!) there would be several men just hanging around the area where females were. It is a constant distraction and NOONE dares say ANYTHING because it is a career death sentence.

I know there are many FReepers who served. Anyone have a different experience?

21 posted on 08/01/2011 10:53:54 PM PDT by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hillarys cankles

I talk to guys that were in THAT navy and I am stunned by the psycho crap that is eating away at the chain of command.

You just cant let people have special privileges.

It ruins mens ressolve when you add that sort of thing to the mix


22 posted on 08/01/2011 10:57:05 PM PDT by mylife (OPINIONS ~ $ 1.00 HALFBAKED ~ 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

I did war games with Army who put women in the field.

It was bizarre.
We had a lactating woman that was given special treatment and upwards of 4 men would shuttle her breast milk back behind lines for the baby.

4 men gone, with a vehicle and assets with us sitting there with a prima donna

I call this madness.


23 posted on 08/01/2011 11:03:52 PM PDT by mylife (OPINIONS ~ $ 1.00 HALFBAKED ~ 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

My brother, who served on a fast-attack nuclear submarine for 4 years, says this social engineering will be nothing short of disastrous.


24 posted on 08/01/2011 11:16:29 PM PDT by bkopto (Obama is merely a symptom of a more profound, systemic disease in American body politic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife
I call this madness.

You call it correctly, as does anyone with half-an-ounce of sense.

25 posted on 08/02/2011 12:01:07 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Women are too much drama for close quarters


26 posted on 08/02/2011 12:02:12 AM PDT by wardaddy (Palin or Bachman..either with Marco....I'm often on a .hence my spelling..sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

and I imagine in a world war fight for survival all this silly shite will be tossed pronto

it’s an indulgence

but destructive


27 posted on 08/02/2011 12:05:09 AM PDT by wardaddy (Palin or Bachman..either with Marco....I'm often on a .hence my spelling..sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: smokingfrog

It will be nuclear but it won’t be an accident.


29 posted on 08/02/2011 1:02:31 AM PDT by infool7 (Let us water the tree...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

wait ‘till (any day now) openly gay males are serving on the subs and sharing those 2 showers


30 posted on 08/02/2011 1:06:27 AM PDT by Enchante (Are there any honest politicians in Washington, DC??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: M-cubed

The Commander slot will be reserved for queers tho.


31 posted on 08/02/2011 1:17:14 AM PDT by Waco (Nominate Palin or forget 2012 you lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: american_ranger

Why waste the time.


32 posted on 08/02/2011 1:21:21 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mylife

That was beyond a stupid situation. They couldn’t find something for the lady to do behind the lines?


33 posted on 08/02/2011 1:23:11 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: american_ranger

It would be a fine testament to his years in the Oval Office...


34 posted on 08/02/2011 1:27:05 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
Ah, that's collateral damage caused by friendly fire torpedoing.

Since pregnant females cannot serve aboard ships once their condition is known, I wonder what the Navy's contingency plan is to remove the pregnant females off the deployed subs and transfer them to shore stations?

35 posted on 08/02/2011 1:29:59 AM PDT by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

If I was on a sub I’d demand to shower with a woman instead of a gay. We all know they BOTH would want me! So I should be able to make my own choice. I mean, choices is what it’s all about. Right?


36 posted on 08/02/2011 2:13:36 AM PDT by Terry Mross (I'll only vote for a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

This is wrong. Women do not belong on a sub with men. If they want an all female crew on a sub, okay fine, I guess. But mixed crew? No way. It’s wrong.


37 posted on 08/02/2011 3:14:16 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
Expect lots of unplanned pregnancies sooner than later.

Is there enough room to find a private spot to "hook up" on a sub?

38 posted on 08/02/2011 3:17:54 AM PDT by hattend (As always... FUJM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

This is a big mistake. STS/2 SS


39 posted on 08/02/2011 3:25:54 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Obama is a Communist, a Muslim, and an illegal alien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

That is such horsesh*t!

Sorry, ladies. If you’re pregnant or nursing, you belong behind a desk on terra firma. You do not belong in a combat situation!


40 posted on 08/02/2011 3:25:54 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson