Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five key senators abandon online piracy bills amid Web protests
The Hill ^ | January 18, 2012 | Brendan Sasso and Gautham Nagesh

Posted on 01/18/2012 3:08:55 PM PST by abb

Congressional support for controversial online piracy legislation eroded dramatically on Wednesday in the face of an unprecedented online protest supported by tech titans such as Google, Wikipedia and Facebook.

Several key senators withdrew their support from the Senate's Protect IP Act (PIPA), including Tea Party favorite Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), an elected member of his party's leadership.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who leads the Senate GOP's campaign team, said the legislation should be put on hold, while Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), a sponsor and the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, retreated from the bill. Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.) also withdrew his sponsorship.

Thousands of websites went dark on Wednesday to protest the two Internet piracy bills, the House's Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Senate's PIPA. At least two California Democrats, Reps. Anna Eshoo and Zoe Lofgren, joined the protests by blacking out their websites.

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), a leader of Senate conservatives, also came out against the bills, calling them "misguided bills that will cause more harm than good."

"When protecting intellectual property rights, we must not undermine free speech, threaten economic growth, or impose burdensome regulations," DeMint tweeted.

Opposition is also building in the House. Two of the original Republican co-sponsors of SOPA, Reps. Ben Quayle (Ariz.) and Lee Terry (Neb.), withdrew their support Tuesday before the protests began, and scores of other lawmakers took to Twitter Wednesday to affirm their opposition.

The coordinated online protests are aimed at bringing down legislation that would empower the Justice Department and copyright holders to demand that search engines delete links to sites deemed to be “dedicated” to copyright infringement. Ad networks and payment processors would be prohibited from doing business with the sites.

Where the protests left the legislation, which is supported by the Motion Picture Association of America and recording industry, among other groups, is unclear. The Senate is scheduled to hold a procedural vote on the legislation next week, but it is uncertain whether the 60 votes to move forward can be found. The fight over the bills has broken across party lines, with House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) leading opposition in the House against Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

Hundreds of millions of Internet users, most of whom might have been unaware of the bills until Wednesday, are likely to have noticed the protests.

Google, the most visited site in the world, plastered a black box evoking censorship over its logo and claimed the bills would "censor the Web and impose harmful regulations on American businesses." Users who click on the black box are re-directed to a petition urging Congress to drop the piracy legislation on a page.

Wikipedia — the world's sixth most popular site, according to the Web firm Alexa — went a step further, shutting down its English-language site entirely. Visitors to Wikipedia are greeted with a minimalistic, dark page with the headline: "Imagine a world without free knowledge."

After announcing he was withdrawing his support, Rubio said Congress should take its time in crafting new legislation that addresses the concerns raised by both the technology and content industries.

“I have been a co-sponsor of the PROTECT IP Act because I believe it’s important to protect American ingenuity, ideas and jobs from being stolen through Internet piracy, much of it occurring overseas through rogue websites in China,” Rubio said in a post on Facebook. “As a senator from Florida, a state with a large presence of artists, creators and businesses connected to the creation of intellectual property, I have a strong interest in stopping online piracy that costs Florida jobs.

“However,” he continued, “we must do this while simultaneously promoting an open, dynamic Internet environment that is ripe for innovation and promotes new technologies.”

Six other GOP senators wrote to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) last week asking him delay a vote on PIPA scheduled for next week, but a senior Democratic aide told The Hill Reid plans to press ahead with the vote after requesting some changes to the Domain Name Service provision from sponsor and Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.).

Google and Wikipedia weren’t the only big-name sites slamming the bills. The popular discussion board reddit went dark at 8:00 a.m., posting a message that read: "SOPA and PIPA damage the Internet. Today we fight back.”

Reddit encouraged users to "take today as a day of focus and action to learn about these destructive bills and do what you can to prevent them from becoming reality."

Wired, a technology magazine, also joined in, blacking out the headlines on its website.

Facebook did not shut down, but the social network's Washington, D.C., office posted a page that said the bills are “not the right solution” because of the “collateral damage they would cause to the Internet."

Other sites participating in the protest include craigslist, Mozilla, Imgur, Raw Story, MoveOn.org, Cheezburger and the Consumer Electronics Association.

The protests seemed to piquing the interest of Web users Wednesday. By mid-morning, “SOPA” and “SOPA blackout” were among the top 10 trending search terms on Google.

The bills' sponsors dismissed the protests Tuesday.

Smith, who authored SOPA, called Wikipedia's protest a "publicity stunt" that promotes "fear instead of facts."

"Perhaps during the blackout, Internet users can look elsewhere for an accurate definition of online piracy," he said.

Leahy, the chief author of the Senate bill, said the protest is based on a misunderstanding of the legislation.

"The PROTECT IP Act will not affect Wikipedia, will not affect reddit, and will not affect any website that has any legitimate use," he said.

"Perhaps if these companies would participate constructively, they could point to what in the actual legislation they contend threatens their websites, and then we could dispel their misunderstandings. That is what debate on legislation is intended to do, to fine-tune the bill to confront the problem of stealing while protecting against unintended consequences."

Movie studios, record labels and business groups say piracy legislation is needed to stop the illegal downloading of movies, music and other copyrighted content, and argue that legislative action is long overdue.

But consumer groups and Web companies warn the bills would stifle innovation and censor free speech. They say the legislation would impose an unreasonable burden on websites to police user-generated content and could lead to legitimate websites getting shut down.

The Motion Picture Association of America called the protests an "abuse of power" aimed at turning Web users into “corporate pawns.”

“A so-called ‘blackout’ is yet another gimmick, albeit a dangerous one, designed to punish elected and administration officials who are working diligently to protect American jobs from foreign criminals,” MPAA Chairman and former Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) said in a statement. “It is our hope that the White House and the Congress will call on those who intend to stage this ‘blackout’ to stop the hyperbole and PR stunts and engage in meaningful efforts to combat piracy.”

The Senate is set to vote on the legislation on Tuesday. Smith has said he will push ahead with the House's version in the Judiciary Committee next month.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: Arkansas; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: Missouri; US: Nebraska; US: Nevada; US: South Carolina; US: Texas; US: Utah; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: alexa; annaeshoo; arizona; arkansas; benquayle; california; cea; cheezburger; china; chrisdodd; connecticut; craigslist; darrellissa; districtofcolumbia; domainnameservice; facebook; florida; google; harryreid; imgur; internet; jimdemint; johnboozman; johncornyn; lamarsmith; leeterry; marcorubio; missouri; moveon; moviestudios; mozilla; nebraska; nevada; orrinhatch; patrickleahy; pipa; protectipact; rawstory; recordlabels; reddit; royblunt; sopa; southcarolina; staterunmedia; texas; utah; vermont; wikipedia; wired; zoelofgren
The cheese starts to bind...
1 posted on 01/18/2012 3:09:01 PM PST by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 04-Bravo; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; carmenbmw; ...

ping


2 posted on 01/18/2012 3:10:18 PM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Hollywood complaining about “abuses of power” — that’s rich. Elitist city. Hopefully a few hundred thousand “pawns” will worship Hollywood a little bit less after today’s protest. Lazy fans who won’t look outside the lamestream generated consensus for entertainment are a lot of the problem.


3 posted on 01/18/2012 3:20:17 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Movie studios, record labels and business groups

Dont they have lawyers to write out some cease and desist letters - those Chinese just need to be educated about piracy and they’ll quit...

Right?


4 posted on 01/18/2012 3:23:09 PM PST by Gasshog (going to get what all those libs asked for, but its not what they expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

This just in.

http://lincolnparishnewsonline.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/scalise-pulls-sopa-sponsorship/

Scalise Pulls SOPA Sponsorship

Louisiana GOP Congressman Steve Scalise (District 1) late today announced he will be removing his name as a sponsor to the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA).

From Communications Director Stephen Bell:

Congressman Scalise is committed to stopping online piracy, and will be removing his name from SOPA while he works to ensure that the freedom of the internet is preserved.

Lincoln Parish News Online (LPNO) earlier today noted Scalise’s sponsorship of the controversial bill. LPNO’s story was carried on two of Louisiana’s leading online news-sites, The Dead Pelican and The Hayride.


5 posted on 01/18/2012 3:31:19 PM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb

Each and every one of them is in someone’s pocket. This is why I don’t just blindly vote for anyone with an (R) after their name.

Just the THREAT of this type of legislation has ALREADY moved some hosting businesses offshore because of unknown liabilities and concerns for future follow-ons.

With Obama chasing away manufacturing, and pubbies chasing away high tech IP, there won’t be much left except to take in each others laundry.

Good job!


6 posted on 01/18/2012 3:31:29 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
"...will not affect any website that has any legitimate use," he said.

Oh really? And just who decides what websites are "legitimate?"? Kind of like banning guns that aren't deemed legitimate for sport hunting.

7 posted on 01/18/2012 3:31:41 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (My greatest fear is that when I'm gone my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gasshog

China won’t play nice and has gotten very bold about putting pirated stuff on sites it has at home.

At least so the story I hear goes, a story which might be severely slanted by media interests playing up a danger to far more than it is.

But Congress is too kitty cat whipped to put sanctions on China. That’s what Google is urging.


8 posted on 01/18/2012 3:38:50 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Another senator just pulled the plug.

http://thehayride.com/2012/01/breaking-vitter-drops-support-for-sopapipa/

BREAKING: Vitter Drops Support For SOPA/PIPA


9 posted on 01/18/2012 3:40:23 PM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: abb
“…working diligently to protect American jobs from foreign criminals”

If only they were so diligent regarding the immigration question.

I propose that we refer to illegal downloaders as "undocumented sharers." We need to bring them out of the shadows…

10 posted on 01/18/2012 3:43:12 PM PST by evilC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gasshog

By the way, if Chinese sites are misbehaving like this, it might be suitable recompense to yank their DNS entries in the Western world, just like is done with serious botware/spyware/virus attacks. Then China can wail all it wants at losing the traffic till it agrees to cooperate to clean up its own act, such as accepting and acting on DMCA-type takedown notices.


11 posted on 01/18/2012 3:44:22 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: evilC

uploaders instead? or too?


12 posted on 01/18/2012 3:45:23 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks abb.
Leahy, the chief author of the Senate bill, said the protest is based on a misunderstanding of the legislation.
Really, just a big misunderstanding? So, what's the Leaky Weasel from Vermont's position on the entire Occutardation that hit last year? The OWS a-holes had a perfect understanding of US politics and the economy?
The Motion Picture Association of America called the protests an "abuse of power" aimed at turning Web users into "corporate pawns."
I can't post what I would like to post in response that the MPAA's demagogic statement -- but point out that the MPAA's mouthpiece is Chris Dodd.


13 posted on 01/18/2012 4:05:45 PM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

This was all just a ploy to get folks mad at “Congress”.

Whenever Hussein’s ratings are in the toilet, Big Media likes to tell us how bad “Congress”’s ratings are.

They created a phony issue and put Republicans on the “wrong” side, inconvenienced us with “black”ened websites and told us all to be mad at “Congress”.

Peas of Sh!t Hussein Heads.


14 posted on 01/18/2012 4:27:06 PM PST by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: abb

“Reps. Ben Quayle (Ariz.)...”

Sounds like a DYNASTY in the making.


15 posted on 01/18/2012 5:03:24 PM PST by BobL ("Heartless" and "Inhumane" FReepers for Cain - we've HAD ENOUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

I do not pretend to understand this bill. But the gist of it seems to be that entities or persons protected by copyright want internet entities they deem to be pirates to be sanctioned by websites where they appear. No?

There is already a remedy for pirates and that is to sue them. No?

IMHO this is another piece of misguided and useless legislation. It tells me a bunch about the conservative/Pubbie Congress critters who sponsored the bill and/or otherwise support it.

My God, we have a Usurping Marxist in the WH trying to destroy the country and this is what they’re spending their time on in Washington? What other word could describe them but dumb?


16 posted on 01/18/2012 5:13:13 PM PST by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb
The fight over the bills has broken across party lines, with House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) leading opposition in the House against Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

Go Issa! And FULS.

17 posted on 01/18/2012 5:23:17 PM PST by Ken H (Austerity is the irresistible force. Entitlements are the immovable object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]




Boop His Tiny Tail!

Before He Turns Into an Enormous Fire-Breathing Monster
Please Donate Monthly!


Sponsors will contribute $10
For each new monthly sign-up

18 posted on 01/18/2012 6:01:21 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abb
SOPA Opera Where Do Your Members of Congress Stand on SOPA and PIPA?

Pelosi and Jackson-Lee are against this bill. I wonder if there is something wrong with it or they didn't get their "appropriate" kickbacks. Oh yeah, that little b*tch Cornyn is still supporting it as of 1930 this PM.

19 posted on 01/18/2012 6:06:53 PM PST by Sarajevo (Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

We got Sen. Vitter, Rep. Scalise, and Rep. Alexander smoked off the bills today.

I figure Mary Landrieu will fold tomorrow.


20 posted on 01/18/2012 6:10:42 PM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: abb
"When protecting intellectual property rights, we must not undermine free speech, threaten economic growth, or impose burdensome regulations,"...

DeMint 'gets it'....

21 posted on 01/18/2012 6:20:27 PM PST by GOPJ (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono
"...will not affect any website that has any legitimate use," he said.

Oh really? And just who decides what websites are "legitimate?"

The 'committee' to decide who's legitimate and who isn't would carry great power - power to gather 'donations' from companies wanting favors.

The last thing we need is one more corrupt group fattening up our almost bribed out 'law' makers. Lawmakers enter congress as middle class - and in a few short years they're millionaires - this is how they get from point A to point B...

22 posted on 01/18/2012 6:26:35 PM PST by GOPJ (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: abb
Toomey has also come out against it
23 posted on 01/18/2012 6:35:28 PM PST by Tribune7 (Vote ABR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Whatever about up/downloaders, I am certainly not in favor of an immigration amnesty.


24 posted on 01/18/2012 6:58:55 PM PST by evilC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: abb

Hundreds of millions of Internet users, most of whom might have been unaware of the bills until Wednesday, are likely to have noticed the protests.

Hundreds of millions have been unaware of the bills because the mainstream media has been hiding these bills hoping Congress would pass them behind our backs. The mainstream media and Congress are the enemy of liberty, freedom and the enemy of the people.

These bills are the worst attack against liberty that I have seen.

And Lamar smith the villain behind these bills has a backup bill PCIPA in case these fail. This PCIPA he says is to protect the children against pornography but has SOPA in it.


25 posted on 01/18/2012 7:12:39 PM PST by Democrat_media (China is destroying all our jobs and manufacturing ability. China makes everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

Lamar reportedly sold his soul to this for only $100 grand. Surely Google could say to Lamar here, give the money back, we have $200 grand for you?


26 posted on 01/18/2012 7:19:40 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

“Leahy, the chief author of the Senate bill, said the protest is based on a misunderstanding of the legislation.”

Uhhh...I would say that the protest is based on an UNDERSTANDING of the legislation.


27 posted on 01/18/2012 9:12:08 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“Lamar reportedly sold his soul to this for only $100 grand. Surely Google could say to Lamar here, give the money back, we have $200 grand for you?”

Well, I wonder what _would_ happen if Google publicly offered this jerk double what he’s gotten for dropping it. Do you think anyone would have the guts to charge Google with bribing a public official? The trial would be vastly entertaining.


28 posted on 01/18/2012 9:15:33 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
"The PROTECT IP Act will not affect Wikipedia, will not affect reddit, and will not affect any website that has any legitimate use," he said.

Ain't it though? One of the few groups that I trust even less than the US Congress is MPAA/RIAA or whatever that stupid acronym is. And don't it figure that that crook Dodd is the doddering idiot in charge of it.

These politicians must be low-grade morons if they think that we don't see that this is the thin edge of the wedge that they've been trying to get their claws into the internet for years. Both US politicians and how many times have we heard about threatened UN internet taxes.

I need to hunt down that petition ;( Saw that google was blacked out but didn't click on it.

All that SOPA does is to set a precedent that govt can dismantle the internet and pull people's domain names and websites just because they don't tow the govt line. The govt decides what's "legitimate" and not.

Not for me anytime in the lifetime of this universe!

Scuzzy politicians ;(

Godspeed

29 posted on 01/18/2012 11:55:45 PM PST by HeartlandOfAmerica (Geithner: Taxes on 'Small Business' Must Rise So Government Doesn't 'Shrink')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

On Freerepublic we need to start a campaign to get rid of Lamar Smith ,Dodd, SOPA, and Leahy .


30 posted on 01/19/2012 2:47:19 AM PST by Democrat_media (China is destroying all our jobs and manufacturing ability. China makes everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie; HeartlandOfAmerica

Schumer, D-NY, and Gillibrand, D-NY, co-sponsors of PIPA, had protesters shouting outside their offices; the criminals of Anonymous busted the website of Holder’s so-called Department of Justice, Leahy’s doubling down looks like his last shriek on the retreat (and hopefully, retirement; he’s the current face on the We Need Term Limits movement), and you’ll notice very few (I saw zero, but maybe there were more) overpaid entertainers giving any encouragement at all to Congress.

Occutardation? No impact at all.

Internet censorship bills? Up in flames, the fascists backed down.

They will be back though.

No Republican should EVER back a bill like this — not even if every hollow idol of Hollywood suddenly endorsed the entire Republican slate of candidates, and we know that will never happen. IOW, since there’s no chance for their support, and every likelihood of their continued hostility, WHY WOULD YOU VOTE FOR IT?


31 posted on 01/19/2012 6:25:31 PM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: abb
Perhaps if these companies would participate constructively....

Shut up, Leahy. Your side had a chance to negotiate in good faith, and blew it off because you thought you'd just get you way without making any concessions.

Now that you've been pwned and come up empty-handed, you whine about "misunderstanding". Go away.

32 posted on 01/24/2012 2:48:41 PM PST by transducer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: transducer

Here was my contribution last week to the fracas. I like to think that my newsblog influenced Scalise to see the light.

http://lincolnparishnewsonline.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/scalise-removes-name-from-sopa-sponsorship-as-promised/
Scalise Removes Name From SOPA Sponsorship, as Promised

http://lincolnparishnewsonline.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/scalise-pulls-sopa-sponsorship/
Scalise Pulls SOPA Sponsorship

http://lincolnparishnewsonline.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/la-congressman-supports-internet-censorship/
LA Congressman Supports Internet Censorship


33 posted on 01/24/2012 2:56:24 PM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: abb
That is what debate on legislation is intended to do, to fine-tune the bill

No, fine-tuning is what happens when a bill is NOT up for a vote - what's debated when a bill is on the floor is yea vs. nay. Old fart Leahy doesn't even understand his own job - and we should believe he understands the Internet better than Wikipedia and reddit?

34 posted on 01/24/2012 3:04:07 PM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

It was very dismaying when so many Republican Reps and Senators signed onto this piece of shyte. What’s the upside for a conservative to support such an awful Hollywood driven bill that totally messes up internet freedom, unless he is getting schmeared (paid off)


35 posted on 01/24/2012 5:08:38 PM PST by dennisw (A nation of sheep breeds a government of Democrat wolves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson