Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Support Myth Obamney? I SAY "HELL NO!" (VANITY)
self | May 3, 2012 | Neil E. Wright

Posted on 05/03/2012 8:47:24 PM PDT by Neil E. Wright

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan

There has been a lot of discussion on this forum on whether or not a "conservative" can or should support Mitt Romney in the general election.

I am 60 years old, and for all of my adult life, since I joined the U.S. Navy at age 17, I have fought the EVIL ideology that is socialism/marxism/communism/statism, call it what you will. And it IS EVIL. It destroys the human spirit. It reduces every individual to a state of hopeless dependence on an all powerful state, run for the benefit of a few favored, powerful, connected people.

We all KNOW that B. HUSSEIN O. is a communist, and truth be told, an islamist supporter. So, he MUST be defeated and destroyed, along with his ideology.

However, myth obamney is also a "progressive" (read COMMUNIST), BY HIS OWN WORDS.

His actual record is indistinguishable from B. HUSSEIN O.

"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton

Therefore, I will NOT vote for a socialist/marxist/communist/statist, REGARDLESS of party label. I WILL NOT VOTE FOR myth obamney in November. I will vote for the Constitution Party candidate, Virgil Goode, or I will write in my DOG over EITHER major party candidate, because they are EXACTLY the same.

Before you start to flame me, ask yourself this: IF myth somehow is elected, do you REALLY expect him to roll back ANYTHING that B. HUSSEIN O. forced on us? ObamaCare??? That is RomneyCare. EPA rules and regulations? Labor relations rules and regulations that empower unions? Energy policy? IS THERE ANYTHING that the rooster-sucking, goat-humping statist socialist/communist Myth Obamney will eliminate? I would suggest that his whole f**king record says not only "no" but "HELL NO!" There is NOTHING he would change.

So, for all the myth obamney lurkers, go back to your f**king candidate and tell him I said he can take his "God in waiting" cult beliefs, his f**king "magic underwear" and his f**king communism and GO STRAIGHT TO HELL!

“Where liberty dwells, there is my country." –Benjamin Franklin

Islam Delenda Est!

REFUSE. RESIST. Do NOT Submit! ★ FREEDOM! ★



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2012; elections; mitt; obama; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-300 next last
To: caww
...we’re constantly being told we have to vote ‘Anybody but Obama’....well we ARE Voting...’against’ them ‘both’.

Exactly.

People need to understand that one can choose 'none of the above' in this rigged game. I and others choose Liberty instead, which means that we choose to resist in whatever ways we can.

241 posted on 05/04/2012 8:30:08 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: S.O.S121.500

Most just go back to the first box.. And bit*h about it from their soap box.


242 posted on 05/04/2012 8:39:59 AM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Nobody is disagreeing that America needs better than this November will offer.

The only debate is over methods. Anyone who puts a clothespin on his nose and goes and votes for Romney in November, and supposing it does get Romney over the hump, does no lasting good if they don’t do anything more. First, to seek a spiritual awakening locally. Second, to try to raise up better politicians for the future.


243 posted on 05/04/2012 8:43:48 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Away with them and the high horses they rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: unkus
If you're on this forum, chances are pretty high you don't like the direction this country has been travelling for the last couple decades, at least.

The poster may have fought it. You may have fought it. And I fought it. But, the collective "we", have had little impact.

The borders are open, currency devalued, industry emaciated, standards of civil behavior lowered, 48% of citizens pay no income tax, the government employee unions and the congress are corrupt, religion has been marginalized, and we have a president who is a Marxist.

Exactly how would you describe the impact that people who share our principles have had on this country of late?
244 posted on 05/04/2012 8:59:00 AM PDT by Jay Santos CP ("Idiocracy"... It's no longer just a movie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Jay Santos CP

You can lay that ALL a the feet of the church in the USA. They willfully lost the culture, compromised with sin, created a whole new ‘Jesus’ to fit the need for the itching ears of the people to hear smooth and easy things, until the church is nothing more than saltless lukewarm water.

When we transformed into a II Timothy 3 generation, our goose was cooked. And until this people does II Chronicles 7:14, there is no saving us from the consequences we have sown and are now reaping.

This people wanted a king and to make government their god. The Almighty granted this people their demand.


245 posted on 05/04/2012 9:10:46 AM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
He's no longer seeking to govern the most liberal state in the country, and is seeking to govern a country with a center-right majority. That fact, which puts him in opposition to Obama and needing conservative (or at least not liberal) support to survive in office, means that circumstances will be pushing him farther to the right.

Circumstances (i.e., the will of the people) will not have the slightest effect on Romney's direction, should he become president. He and his compatriot, Obama, do not answer to us, our wishes, or our Founding Covenants. They answer to other masters.

It's a hopeful, but naive thought, that a man like Romney possesses sufficient connection to his fellow Americans and our shared history and core values, to be swayed by our political will. He has demonstrated this throughout his political career, yet some people cling to the vain hope that they can somehow reach him.

If you're that type of 'clinger', prepare for the disappointment of a lifetime.

246 posted on 05/04/2012 9:20:45 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Then count me confused by your previous post, in which you essentially characterized Romney as a political opportunist:

The only core principles Mitt has, are those that concern Mitt....He would have sold out to the right, if the political conditions had been reversed.

But now, you're saying that political circumstances "will not have the slightest effect" on him, because he's committed to other beliefs. So is he just a political opportunist who will support the right as easily as the left if it advantagees him, or is he a committed lefty?

247 posted on 05/04/2012 9:28:22 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Jay Santos CP

When you put it that way, no problem. I could not agree with you more. Regards.


248 posted on 05/04/2012 9:32:06 AM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
"The time to fight back is now"

And you are fighting back by voting for Virgil Goode, Mickey Mouse, Luke Skywalker? Heck just vote for Thomas Jefferson, he has just as good a chance.

The choice is going to be Obama or Romney and they are worlds apart. If you don't want to have a say in the matter then fine, but you should know Obama is a damn dangerous man and you will be helping him.

249 posted on 05/04/2012 9:48:01 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: unkus; Neil E. Wright
Yea, it may have come across as an insult to neil e. wright, which wasn't my intention.

We've had some success with conservative principles, but the drift is towards statism. We are in a place that would have been inconceivable to an American in the 1950's. Not accepting it, but being realistic about what our efforts have yielded presently.
250 posted on 05/04/2012 9:48:37 AM PDT by Jay Santos CP ("Idiocracy"... It's no longer just a movie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright

All elections are ultimately voting for the lesser of two evils. We already know the evil in the WH. Four more years of his rule and we will be become what was the Soviet Union. He is totally out of control. If that is what you want to do go ahead but to my mind it is cutting off your nose to spite your face.


251 posted on 05/04/2012 9:52:59 AM PDT by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn
Obama the socialist for 4 more or Romney the socialist for 4-8..... tough choice.. They both suck. What is behind door number 3?

There is no door number 3.

252 posted on 05/04/2012 9:54:23 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gusty
Oh Brother. This is a conservative website? I’m sorry, my mistake. I thought I was somewhere else. See I saw all these people dumping on my opponent I just got confused.

LOL! That's alright Barry, you're not the only one who has been confused around this place lately! Oh, and Barry, try not to take my tag line too personal but you really do suck!

253 posted on 05/04/2012 10:03:16 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Even a flip-flopper can flop the right way every once and a while.

You know, I'm not sure that "flip-flopping" on positions is necessarily a bad trait for a politician. What's wrong with putting your finger to the wind and actually listening to your constituents? George W. Bush never did this, even when his constituents were screaming at him.

254 posted on 05/04/2012 10:06:48 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn

Supporting the flip flopper because he might flip to your side on an issue and then HOPE he stays there....
_________________________________________

If the Democrats hold the Senate with Harry Reid as the leader, Willard will not go against a fellow Mormon on any issue...

Both have sworn oaths to obey their religion and are answerable to the Mormon pope and not to the people of America...

It will be whatever the Mormon pope wants...


255 posted on 05/04/2012 10:17:44 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

I could just as easily say ‘no votes for gun grabbers,’ that’s been my bottom line for over 30 years, but baby killers are worse so there is no need to bring anything else into it.


256 posted on 05/04/2012 10:24:58 AM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: INVAR
Why didn't Reagan stay within the Democrat party and try reforming it from within instead of jumping parties?

Because the Democrat party is the home for liberals and the GOP is the home for Conservatives. The great majority of conservatives who vote in primaries vote GOP.

We have a two party system. Which one conservatives should choose to make more conservative is obvious. Was to Reagan, should be to us.

257 posted on 05/04/2012 12:25:38 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

Now, tell us how you really feel!LOLLOL


“My, my,” she said fanning herself with her copy of the Constitution and fluttering her eyelashes. “Did I say that out loud?” : )


258 posted on 05/04/2012 12:58:19 PM PDT by MWestMom (The heart of the wise inclines to the right, But the heart of the fool to the left. Ecclesiastes10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Species8472
Nail on the head.... Divide and conquer. Simple, old, effective strategy.
259 posted on 05/04/2012 1:12:39 PM PDT by MWestMom (The heart of the wise inclines to the right, But the heart of the fool to the left. Ecclesiastes10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Pure arrogance.
Any country can fail.
Any ship can sink, even the “unsinkable” Titanic.


260 posted on 05/04/2012 1:34:34 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-300 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson