Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Investigator Mike Zullo Rely On 1969 Code #9 for Obama's COLB Or Code #9 from 1961?
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/vsus_1961_1.pdf ^

Posted on 07/23/2012 9:21:28 PM PDT by Fred Garvin-MP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-245 next last
To: 4Zoltan
It is in Kenya.
Well he wasn't in Kenya, was he.

So would Obama Sr. consider himself “African”.
Another question without a question mark?

He could consider himself to be a Leprechaun.
There is no "racial category" for Leprechaun either.

141 posted on 07/24/2012 11:51:21 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Zullo said in the press conference that ‘African’ didn’t come start being used until 1989.


142 posted on 07/24/2012 11:54:24 AM PDT by Fred Garvin-MP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Look at the 1968 tape instructions that you posted a link to earlier. Parents place of birth is not one of the fields. This is also true for the one obtained by FOIA for 1961.

“And what code key are you using to make that determination?”

Both the 1961 (FOIA obtained) and the 1968 tape instructions.


143 posted on 07/24/2012 11:56:36 AM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: tallyhoe

Yep.

The Foggers have similar threads up trying to obfuscate the coding as per CDC, etc.


144 posted on 07/24/2012 12:07:13 PM PDT by NOVACPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fred Garvin-MP
Zullo said in the press conference that ‘African’ didn’t come start being used until 1989.

Did he say African or African-American? I don't remember.
How about a video and a time mark, just to verify what he said?

145 posted on 07/24/2012 12:10:44 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Fred Garvin-MP
Here ya go...@ Full Press Conference Sheriff Joe Arpaio Barack Obama Birth Certificate July 17, 2012
If it's not too much trouble.
146 posted on 07/24/2012 12:14:42 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

bookmark


147 posted on 07/24/2012 12:20:22 PM PDT by saleman (!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan
Look at the 1968 tape instructions that you posted a link to earlier. Parents place of birth is not one of the fields.
The 1968 link says...Race of Child (Determined from Parents “race)
And both Race of Father and Race of Mother have a "size of Field" allocation as 1.
Why even have a field if nothing is to be recorded?
Wouldn't a field be there so something could be entered.

This is also true for the one obtained by FOIA for 1961.
Well how do you know that the FOIA wasn't only a partial release? If information wasn't specifically asked for in the FOIA it wouldn't be given out.
We sure need to get those 1961 codes out to the public. It makes no sense to keep them under wraps.

Now look at the WND BC that otherss posted earlier. It shows a “3” as the race of parents.
Which image are you talking about again, specifically? You're kind of vague there.

148 posted on 07/24/2012 12:30:55 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Fred Garvin-MP

Mark @ 18:00-18:12


149 posted on 07/24/2012 12:40:17 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: philman_36; Fred Garvin-MP

“He could consider himself to be a Leprechaun.
There is no “racial category” for Leprechaun either.’

The 1964 report you posted up thread says this:

“Also beginning with 1964 ill-defined or not clearly identifiable races are assigned to “race not stated. ” This includes such reports as “oriental” and “yellow, ” which in previous years were assigned to a specific category such as other nonwhite, Chinese, or Japanese.”

So according to the NIHS, they sometimes saw “yellow” reported as a race. Is that one of the race categories?

And before 1964 a term like “yellow” or “African” would be forced into one of the specific categories like “nonwhite, Chinese, or Japanese” But after 1964 a term like “yellow” or “African” would be coded as “race not stated.”


150 posted on 07/24/2012 12:40:39 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: saleman
I've noticed you've done that with several of my links.


Just because you like my links doesn't mean we'll be taking warm showers together
until the wee hours of the morning.

/lounge lizard

151 posted on 07/24/2012 12:52:56 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: philman_36; Fred Garvin-MP

“And both Race of Father and Race of Mother have a “size of Field” allocation as 1.”

I don’t dispute that the race of the parents was coded by the the Feds but did they code the parents place of birth? I don’t see any mention of the parents place of birth in the 1968 or 1961 tape instructions. Do you?

Why code something that was not required by the Feds?

“Well how do you know that the FOIA wasn’t only a partial release?”

I don’t. But what has been released, the tape instructions, is in the exact same format as the 1968 tape instructions used by the CCP.

“Which image are you talking about again, specifically? You’re kind of vague there.”

Sorry, I assumed you were familar with it.

Here’s the link to the WND August 23rd, 1961 BC.

http://www.wnd.com/2011/09/342937/


152 posted on 07/24/2012 1:17:01 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan
So what has 1964 info got to do with 1961?
And it still doesn't explain how "African" got on there.

And before 1964 a term like “yellow” or “African” would be forced into one of the specific categories like “nonwhite, Chinese, or Japanese”

And even now, whether you realize it or not, you're admitting that there was no "specific category" of "African" for anything to be forced into.

Here ya go...what "specific category" would Caucasian go in?

153 posted on 07/24/2012 1:18:13 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan

Yea that might be the codes he would have used in Kenya to refer to himself as being called, but this is United States Federal/Hawaiian codes he would have been dealing with which was different than Kenya’s.


154 posted on 07/24/2012 1:23:30 PM PDT by Fred Garvin-MP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: philman_36; Fred Garvin-MP

“you’re admitting that there was no “specific category” of “African” for anything to be forced into. “

There was the category “other nonwhite”, it is listed in the tape instructions (1961 and 1968) and in the Vital Statistic reprots for 1961 and 1968.

I point out the 1964 “yellow” reference to show that BCs can sometimes have weird or as they politely call them “ill-defined or not clearly identifiable races”. Ill defined entries are more likely the results of the parents self-reporting then the hospital staff screwing up.

Forcing “African” into a specific category means coding it using one of the predefined categories, not changing what the parents wrote down.


155 posted on 07/24/2012 1:39:05 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan
...did they (the Feds) code the parents place of birth? I don’t see any mention of the parents place of birth in the 1968 or 1961 tape instructions. Do you?
Nope I don't see it, but the numbers sure are there, aren't they.

Why code something that was not required by the Feds?

Good question. Maybe you should ask Hawaii instead of me. Or maybe they were required and we're just not aware of it. You know, as in the requirement was carried over from one year to the next without the necessity of it being spelled out.
I don't have all the answers. As I've @said before I'm really only making educated guesses.

Sorry, I assumed you were familar with it.
Well you made an ass of u, not me, by not being specific.

It shows a “3” as the race of parents. By the Feds that means they were American Indians. And in parents place of birth they are both listed as “1”. Is that the code for Hawaii? Are they ethnic Hawaiians?
Well find the code and figure it out for yourself! And as soon as you do fill me in.

Hey, here's a thought...maybe it means 1 - "Residents" or 2 - "Nonresidents by place of residence"

Just an educated guess.

156 posted on 07/24/2012 1:44:21 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Fred Garvin-MP
Some of the detractors are using the excuse for using the word ‘African’ is that it was ‘Self Reported’ by the parent since he was from Africa and he didn’t want to put down negro or black.

So if the father had been a former Nazi and had self-reported as "Master Race", the form would have reflected that?

157 posted on 07/24/2012 1:45:40 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
In the sixties the blacks started asking “Who are colored people?” I thought that was pretty slick of them.

They should have been asking the folks over at the NAACP. :=)

158 posted on 07/24/2012 1:49:50 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: chatter4

“The Feds did track Month of birth. August is the 8th month, yet on Obama’s Birth Certificate, you’ll see it was coded as a 1, meaning January in the time of birth slot.’

I don’t see “1” in the month box but there is “1” in the hour box. The Nordykes also have “1”s in the hour boxes. So does the August 23rd, 1961 BC. I think in this case “1” stands for “P” as in “P.M.”.

“Also, on the Nordyke twins Birth Certificates, their births are coded as 1-2 and 2-2 just like one would number boxes being shipped. Obama’s should have been coded as 1-1, but instead it says X - X. An X means “not stated”.”

The WND August 23rd, 1961 BC also has “X - X”

http://www.wnd.com/2011/09/342937/


159 posted on 07/24/2012 1:51:59 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan
You missed my question...what "specific category" would Caucasian go in?

Caucasian (@see Nordyke BC as well) instead of white I could understand, but African? At least Caucasian is a race.

160 posted on 07/24/2012 1:53:29 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-245 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson