Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PolitiFiction - PolitiFact canít be trusted to get the story right
National Review Online ^ | August 28, 2012 | Editors

Posted on 08/28/2012 2:38:52 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

The website PolitiFact is going to be truth-squadding the Republican convention speakers this week, delivering verdicts on which claims are “mostly true” and which deserve a “pants on fire” rating. Our advice: Pay no attention to those ratings. PolitiFact can’t be trusted to get the story right.

Its recent rulings on Medicare have demonstrated the point thrice over. PolitiFact said that Romney’s comment that Obama had “robbed” Medicare of $716 billion to pay for Obamacare was “mostly false.” Among its reasons: “The money was not robbed in any literal sense of the word.” So if Romney led anyone to believe that Obama had held Medicare at gunpoint and ordered it to hand over its wallet, they can now rest easy, because PolitiFact is on the case.

PolitiFact’s other arguments are that Medicare spending will continue to rise and that Obama’s spending reductions are “mainly aimed at insurers and hospitals, not beneficiaries.” Leave aside the economic naïveté of that argument, and focus instead on the irrelevance. Romney said that Obama had taken money that was going to be spent on Medicare and instead spend it on Obamacare, and suggested that this was a bad thing. In other words: an absolutely true claim, and an opinion based on it. If PolitiFact disagrees with that opinion, let it publish its views under a different name.

PolitiFact zinged Paul Ryan (“mostly false”) for saying that Obama “puts a board of 15 unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats in charge of Medicare who are required to cut Medicare in ways that will lead to denied care for current seniors.” Those bureaucrats aren’t “unaccountable,” says PolitiFact, because they can be removed for “malfeasance in office” — which obviously isn’t what Ryan was getting at. “Their recommendations can be rejected by Congress,” it continues. Sure. But their recommendations can also become law without any congressional action: a process that can reasonably be described as lacking the accountability some people find worthwhile in lawmaking. PolitiFact complains as well about “bureaucrats”: “They become members of the bureaucracy by definition once they join the board. But they won’t all start that way.”

Confronted with a real falsehood, however, PolitiFact gets soft. An Obama ad had claimed that Paul Ryan’s Medicare plan could raise costs for senior citizens by $6,400 — and PolitiFact rated it “mostly true,” and then backed down to “half true.” It is wholly false. Ryan’s most recent plan was designed so that seniors will never have to pay more for Medicare than they would under Obama’s budgets. PolitiFact claims that Obama is giving an accurate characterization of an older version of Ryan’s plan. It justifies Obama’s attack on this outdated plan because the Congressional Budget Office has not evaluated the new one. Yet no evaluation by the CBO is needed to reject Obama’s attack. Ryan’s plan guarantees that seniors would always have at least one insurance option that will cost them no more than Medicare does, and at least one option that will leave them ahead.

PolitiFact sometimes rates Democratic claims as false and Republican ones as true, and Republicans on those occasions are often tempted to cite the organization in their defense. They should resist the temptation, or at least preface any comment with an acknowledgment of PolitiFact’s limited credibility. (As in, “Even PolitiFact saw through the latest Obama ad.”)

PolitiFact has just introduced a new “Settle It!” app which it calls, with amazing gall, an “argument ender.” Maybe it’s liberal bias that explains PolitiFact’s blown calls. Whatever the reason, it is no good at distinguishing between truth and falsehood, which is to say at its professed mission. It should therefore give itself a “pants on fire” rating and shut itself down.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: inbagforobama; media; politics; politifact; rncconvention
LINKS at source.
1 posted on 08/28/2012 2:39:02 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
They do occasionally get it right.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2011/dec/20/lie-year-democrats-claims-republicans-voted-end-me/

2 posted on 08/28/2012 2:44:37 AM PDT by South40 ("Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance." Hussein Obama, Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

In other news today, scientists discovered that water is wet.


3 posted on 08/28/2012 2:48:44 AM PDT by Hoodat ("As for God, His way is perfect" - Psalm 18:30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Apparently “PolitiFact” needs to be scrutinized by “PolitiFact.”

One skunk in the flowers makes acres of stinking blooms.

4 posted on 08/28/2012 2:50:14 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Who needs Michelle? The MSM keep Obama satisfied.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

The AJC has its own Politifact syndication outlet and peppers the morning drive time radio with its BS....They are so far in the tank for Obama it isn’t funny. WSB750 has turned into a subtly socialist dogma outlet with all the slanted political news they present now - thank Scott Slade and crew...


5 posted on 08/28/2012 3:03:07 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: South40
Yet from the link where you applaud their "getting it right, " there are the usual poison pills.......

..........."At times, Democrats and liberal groups were careful to characterize the Republican plan more accurately. Another claim in the ad from the Agenda Project said the plan would "privatize" Medicare, which received a Mostly True rating from PolitiFact. President Barack Obama was also more precise with his words, saying the Medicare proposal "would voucherize the program and you potentially have senior citizens paying $6,000 more."

....The plan has some guarantees for coverage, although seniors would have to pay more to get the benefits they receive today, according to an analysis completed earlier this year by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

......It’s not the first time it’s been suggested that Medicare be changed from its current fee-for-service, where the government pays all the bills, to one that uses private insurers. In the past, some Democrats have even favored such proposals, especially if -- unlike the Ryan plan -- the support was linked to medical inflation, or there were an option for traditional Medicare, or there were more explicit protections for consumers."...

6 posted on 08/28/2012 3:04:05 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
As Neal Boortz used to say when he was on WGST:

WSB = Were Such Buttheads

7 posted on 08/28/2012 3:43:37 AM PDT by Hoodat ("As for God, His way is perfect" - Psalm 18:30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Now he ARE one!


8 posted on 08/28/2012 7:08:58 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Yes, I am aware they cannot write a story w/o injecting their liberal bias. But even you should be able to comprehend the point to which I was referring.

Lie of the Year 2011: 'Republicans voted to end Medicare'

9 posted on 08/28/2012 10:26:44 AM PDT by South40 ("Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance." Hussein Obama, Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: South40
...But even you should be able to comprehend

You never disappoint.

10 posted on 08/28/2012 12:37:31 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
You never disappoint.

And you never fail to entertain.

11 posted on 08/28/2012 12:44:05 PM PDT by South40 ("Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance." Hussein Obama, Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

BTTT!


12 posted on 08/28/2012 1:08:44 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson