It was a Progressive-Socialist Idea from the very beginning.
Posted on 09/01/2012 8:02:54 AM PDT by pistolpackinpapa
Those of you who listened to Rush yesterday already know this, but: Just as he was coming upon a commercial break, at one point in the broadcast, he closed out with this statement: "Latest poll shows 77 percent of Missourians forgive Todd Akin. He trails McCaskill by only one point. Hmmmmmmm.........."
Hoping he wins.
Imagine where the race would be if the GOPe & the ‘moderates’ hadn’t behave like Pavlov’s dog at the sight of a rolled up newspaper.
With Akin in our out, I want a Republican win, for the Senate and for Romney. The all out assault on Akin by the GOP, and people who should have known better, have made winning Missouri difficult, to say the least.
Yes, Akin said something which sounds absurd, and the liberals hyperventilated.
Even many Republicans hyperventilated about it. But at the end of the day, are conservatives in Missouri really going to vote for McKaskill (sp?) again, just because Akin said something stupid? Liberals say stupid things all the time and it doesn’t matter.
And, are those same voters really going to vote for Obama, to punish Romney because a fellow Repulican said something stupid?
I think this race in Missouri with Akin may well be very close.
Agreed.
I bet he wins. It would be classic! HA!
Papa is a trolling drone.
_____________________________________________________________
Still pissed because I exposed your religious hypocrisy; huh cripplecreek? Give it up dude!!!!
Newt defended him yesterday
...sometimes it’s a revelation to see back and watch the knees jerk...
...and sometimes it’s a revelation to SIT back and watch the knees jerk...
Ahh here’s the thread you want people to see.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2922404/posts
Hey, pistol what religious hypocrisy is that?
You are not talking about truth.
Care to expand.
Even many Republicans hyperventilated about it.
Yep. He said something really stupid and I'll admit I was among the Republicans who hyperventilated about it. Yet in my heart I knew that there was no realistic chance at this time to replace him with someone else and I also knew that if I lived in Missouri, I'd still vote for him regardless of the extremely moronic comment he made.
Hope he pulls it off and I hope the idiocy "legitimate rape" never again leaves his lips. And I hope conservative candidates learn a valuable lesson from this. It's all too easy to hobble a campaign by putting your foot in your mouth.
Jeez Louise, the Democrats say something stupid eight times a day. Joe Biden alone would keep their consecutive game batting streak alive. A stupid conservative over a clever liberal any day of the week (at least in my book).
pistolpackinpapa
Since May 12, 2012
view home page, enter name:
~ About ~ Links ~ Contact ~ In Forum ~ Mail To ~
Return
pistolpackinpapa hasn’t created an about page.
Yet ANOTHER Anonymous COWARD Post SOMETHING(even a State/National Flag) BRAVE GUY!
There have been quite a few n00bs, who signed up within the last few months, trolling the forum.
Why is this in “news/activism”? It should be in chat as there is no link to any article.
I don’t think he can win, don’t think it will very close either.
But I hope he wins and if he does you can crow about it, I won’t mind a bit.
I can't directly oppose people like Rove, but I can fight back by sending donations to Todd Akin.
It is my hope that an army of conservatives will rally to support Todd Akin, and that he will be elected to the Senate.
Take that, Rove.
Checks to the Akin campaign with 'FUKR' on the Memo/For line would send a not-so subtle message...
Just rememebr: Whatever the crimes of the parent(s) the child is always innocent.
They do more than just say things. The ‘rats have re-elected a murderer (Kennedy the Schwimmer), a sodomite whose “boyfriend” ran a prostitution ring from his home (Big Barney), a rapist (Clinton), a KKK member (Byrd), a dope addict (Marion Berry) and more. They can kiss my azz.
Sentencing the child to death seems like an islamic thing to me.
Lets not forget the grand wizard Robert Byrd or the ever entertaining Conyers Klan.
I think we will start hearing ‘pragmatic’ again.
“Newt defended him yesterday”
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
That is fine if Republican surrogates like Gingrich defend him. Romney and Ryan and the RNC should still stay far away, and not say anything, or provide any money.
If Akin can win on his own, that is fine. We likely need that seat to win back the Senate, and we likely need MO’s 10 EV’s to win POTUS.
The furor seems to have passed here, but it will start right back up if Romney/Ryan/RNC give him any kind of support. No one should be fooled into thinking otherwise.
We cannot give the Left fuel to energize their base, de-energize our base, and win sympathy for the independents.
Actions do speak louder than mere words, don't they.
That is an incredible post. I am highly impressed and respect you a ton more. I am so glad you are on our side.
If this refers to the poll taken by an advocacy group one has to be skeptical of its validity. Did Rush not do his normal homework?
Not that I don’t want the RAT defeated though.
Legitimate rape is defined in the AP (Associated Press) style book. Used by journalists for conformity.
What if he comes up "just short"; within the margin of cheating? That could happen because the knee jerks attacked him and withdrew money and support.
“Imagine where the race would be if the GOPe & the ‘moderates’ hadn’t behave like Pavlov’s dog at the sight of a rolled up newspaper”
Including Limbaugh.
http://www.inquisitr.com/308779/even-rush-limbaugh-thinks-todd-akins-comments-were-stupid/
“Rush Limbaugh joined the rising chorus of conservative voices urging Todd Akin to withdraw from his Senate race on Tuesday,”
The Akin “conroversy” brought out just how many will murder innocent babies.
If you allow the rape and incest exceptions you are simply setting vague limits on whic innocent baies you will murder.
No question is more fundamental than “are you comfortable with killing a baby to make your own life or someone else’s life more materially satisfying ?”
I guess I should ask “Is murder acceptable if the victim causes you inconvenience?”
Abort the babies,euthanise the eldery, ill,and disabled.
Nope,America is NOT a Christian nation.
He ain’t leaving.
We can either concede the seat to a vulnerable, wounded incumbent Democrat, or we can beat her with the guy who got nominated.
Seems like a fairly obvious choice to me.
And what does your "Hmmmmmm...." mean???
BTW Welcome to Free Republic. Will you be staying long???
Since 2012-05-12
Rick Tyler, Newt's former campaign manager, is now working with the Akin campaign.
The Akin “conroversy” brought out just how many will murder innocent babies.
If you allow the rape and incest exceptions you are simply setting vague limits on whic innocent baies you will murder.
No question is more fundamental than “are you comfortable with killing a baby to make your own life or someone else’s life more materially satisfying ?”
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
While we have the same goals, we must also be politically and incrementally pragmatic.
If you try to get everything all at once, you will most definitely alienate the needed middle, and fanatically energize the opposition base. Then you will never get anything.
Best is to take this in steps. Eliminate 99% of abortions now. Once the culture gets acclimated, the last 1% should be easy.
You've said a lot about yourself and nothing about anyone else with that statement. LOL
FWIW there is no account for the handle ‘admin’ so when you put that in the ‘to’ line you aren’t pinging anyone.
Looks like the Liberal Pro-Abort PhonyCons are backtracking....quick, call Sean Hannity so he can whine like a liberal schoolgirl again....
I think the PhonyCons Saul Alinsky tactics are not working. Social Conservatives are the base of the GOP....and the GOP cannot win without them. Go try and beat Democrats with a coalition of Illegal Aliens and Log Cabin Gays
As I've asked you before: whose fault would it be if Akin wins and Romney loses? I don't expect such an outcome but perhaps the people of Missouri would like a real conservative and not the phony one at the top of the Republican ticket.
It's probably a stretch but I could see some independents splitting their tickets and voting for someone who has firm convictions (even if the voter isn't that wild about the convictions) and a waffler who opportunistically says whatever he thinks you want to hear. I know several people who voted for Ronald Reagan twice even though they didn't agree much with his politics but were attracted to the sincerity of his convictions. There is something very unnerving about a candidate who won't tell you what he or she really believes or who lack convictions and flip flops all over the place - you just don't know what you are getting.
Got a link to that? I'd love to read it.
Translation: *you* have *more* than a thousand.
If you're saying that I, personally, have more than 1k cases of ammo then you're wrong. Maybe a thousand rounds. Maybe. I wouldn't store ammo in my shed either. That's just dumb.
No translation needed to see how you think though. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.