Posted on 12/12/2012 10:29:35 PM PST by varmintman
Ever wonder how a state like Fla. whose state senate is owned by the GOP 28/12 could go for Bork Obunga in a national election (or Ohio 23/10) or how a total bastion of libtardism like Michigan could pass a right-to-work law or why RR couldn't take Wiconsin after Scott Walker's stunning victories and with Ryan one of the two R's on the ticket??
The basic cold, hard reality of it: dems can manufacture all the vote they want and it won't buy state houses, the GOP will still control its own districts, it's only statewide or national elections which can be swung by fraud. Likewise the US house of representatives is more resistant to fraud than the senate.
I hope you are correct. Might you have more data or other reasons to support your hopeful hypothesis?
Hmm, makes sense.
In their districts and precincts, in statewide elections, they can cheat, stuff ballot boxes/computers and manufacture votes with reckless abandon and thus sway statewide counts and national elections.
BUT in the districts and precincts they don’t own, they cannot cheat.
So they have wide margins statewide but still lose in the state senate and house majorities.
And since each US Representative district is about the same population, this dichotomy is virtually de-facto proof that something “unusual” - but which is business-as-usual for them - is happening.
We have crossed the corruption cliff, and this is a bigger problem than the fiscal cliff.
In WV, no stranger to vote fraud, the RATS hold ALL the state-wide offices* and control the House of Delegates and Senate, yet EVERY COUNTY went for R/R.
just sayin’.
* the office of AG did go to the GOP in this election.
It is really hard for “former” ACORNers, the people who undoubtedly got organized to work the polls for The BFLAN, to do more that one thing at a time more than once.
Look at the Wisconsin recall vote on the state Supreme Court justice recently. They held back some conservative district vote tallies while the democrats reported the Milwaukee liberal counts. Those votes were frozen and fraud proof and then the conservative districts reported.
We won that one legally. But they did steal the Wisconsin national vote for Obama.
Just think what is coming to WV. Whole counties will be devastated worse than Detroit. NO jobs, not even one, when the mines close. Now they may still vote Rat just to get grants and food stamps, but there is no hiding who killed WV.
The GOP needs to somehow defuse the social issue, particularly abortion, and then find a fool-proof way to eliminate the fraud and insist that it be eliminated. Either that or be permanently subjugated or start another civil war....
This sort of stuff has been in the democrat playbook forever.
How Lyndon Johnson won his first race.
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/11/us/how-johnson-won-election-he-d-lost.html
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2151840?uid=3739920&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101445101583
And then in the 1960 elections, it was Chicago, and Texas again, that were able to shift enough votes for JFK to defeat Nixon. Nixon didn’t challenge it “for the good of the country” and that as far as I know was the real reason.
http://stonezone.com/article.php?id=391
The republic may be over the tipping point. I would like to hope that THIS Obama administration may be so corrupt and outrageous that it will propel the pendulum back...
... but sometimes, the clock just stops and never runs again.
:-/
This is some excellent analysis.
I figure Ubama had some very crafty Chicago mobsters working the small handful of “swing states” - - a couple hundred votes in this precinct, a couple hundred votes in that precinct, and pretty soon you can turn a close “swing state” into a pile of winner-take-all electoral votes. Focus on concentrated Democrat parasite nests (”cities”), like Philadelphia for example, and there is no limit to the number of votes you can manufacture (or discard).
Look at Pennsylvania - - we have a Republican governor and one pretty conservative Republican senator and Republicans hold a 30-20 majority in the Senate and a 112-90 majority in the House.
Yet Pennsylvania easily went to the African communist in November?
BTW, did you get nervous when the Ubama team never got nervous at any point in the campaign? I did. But then, on the day before the election, I read that Ubama’s people were warning their supporters, “Don’t pay any attention to early exit polls”, and I knew the fix was in.
Shame on the Republicans for not figuring out a way to reign in rat vote fraud.
Thanks for the links. The history of voter fraud is compelling and depressing for sure. The theory of the Kennedy assassination is also intriguing.
There are numerous theories as to what happened to JFK. Until recently I'd thought they were all more or less equally plausible, but that has changed.
This is what I view as the real version. The author of that book was a member of the A team and not just another clown with another theory. The fingerprints of the man he implicates as the main functionary in the assasination, Mac Wallace, have been found in that book depository from which at least one of the shots was fired.
Completely wrong. The R states have been gerrymandered to get the maximum number of R districts. That is one of the main reasons we have so many RINOs because the R races are tight (55 to 45 or tighter). The D districts in R states are all 90% to 10% votes electing blacks or hard core liberals. But when adding up the statewide vote the totals even out and B.O. won statewide.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.