Posted on 01/07/2013 4:36:57 PM PST by Red in Blue PA
USA --(Ammoland.com)- In coming weeks, you will face pressure from the Obama administration and others to implement a ban on semi-automatic firearms and certain ammunition feeding devices, and to pass laws requiring private gun transfers to be processed via the National Instant Check System. Yet the assault weapon misnomer is a myth perpetuated by gun control advocates who seek to confuse the public about the difference between millions of semi-automatic firearms, which are functionally identical to hunting rifles, and military assault rifles which are machine guns virtually unavailable to the public since implementation of the National Firearms Act of 1934. The Truth About Modern Rifles The modern rifles Senator Dianne Feinstein has, by her own admission, waited decades to ban differ from others primarily by cosmetic features such as barrel shrouds, threaded barrels, flash suppressors, pistol grips and adjustable stocks ¡V things which do not affect function. The notion being promulgated by gun control advocates that such features increase lethality by allowing guns to be fired from the hip is absurd: Any firearms expert will attest that rifles can only be effectively utilized from the shoulder. Although you are being told that ammunition used by modern rifles is excessively destructive, in truth it is ballistically inferior to common .30-06 hunting ammunition and was selected by the military not for its lethality, but instead for light weight and low recoil.
(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...
Thanks for the post.
How about DURING the Inauguration? That would set a charge up their butts.
If I were a liberal Democrat and I got this letter, I wouldn’t be worried either.
‘34 required a $200 tax, and FOPA cut off the supply of new automatics.
Half right doesn’t count.
Let’s steer this back to the discussion of protecting kids from shooters in the school.
I have a better idea. Ignore their unconstitutional laws.
Tell them all to go straight to hell.
“I have a better idea. Ignore their unconstitutional laws.
Tell them all to go straight to hell.”
Well that’s two of us. Back-to-back and we’ve got a plan. I’ll see you on the green! I’ll bring the coffee and tobacco.
How about gaining the offensive in this manner. Include in the letter this ultimatum. “You are hereby advised that all law abiding gun owners will refuse to pay any federal income tax to a government that acts unconstitutionally.”
A million armed gun owner march would be better.
We need to be on the offense. There are a lot of us, I just wish we were better organized and committed.
Yes, let’s go on the offensive. The 86, 68 and 34 gun control acts are all unConstitutional so lets push back hard for repeal of them all.
Inform all those voting for any “disarmament legislation” that you will hold them personally responsible for any harm that comes to you or your family due to your inability to protect them from bodily harm.
That would be a hate crime. And waaaaaysist!
and effective.
You can’t reason with communists, Nazis or 30 IQ leftist apes.
Both the NFA of ‘34 and the GCA of ‘68 need to be repealed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.