Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gen. Dempsey: If Women Can’t Meet Military Standard, Pentagon ... Have to Be That High?
CNS News ^ | January 25, 2013 | Pete Winn

Posted on 01/25/2013 10:23:19 AM PST by george76

Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Thursday that with women now eligible to fill combat roles in the military, commanders must justify why any woman might be excluded – and, if women can’t meet any unit’s standard, the Pentagon will ask: “Does it really have to be that high?”

Dempsey’s comments came at a Pentagon news conference with Defense Sec. Leon Panetta Thursday, announcing the shift in Defense Department policy opening up all combat positions to women.

...

“Importantly, though, if we do decide that a particular standard is so high that a woman couldn't make it, the burden is now on the service to come back and explain to the secretary, why is it that high? Does it really have to be that high? With the direct combat exclusion provision in place, we never had to have that conversation.”

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: standardslowered
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: george76

Somewhere in China the generals are smiling.


21 posted on 01/25/2013 10:50:46 AM PST by Trod Upon (Civilian disarmament is the precursor to democide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
I honestly think that the reason they want to have women in the front lines is because they never intend us to ever fight win a war again. So what difference does it make?

There.

Fixed.

22 posted on 01/25/2013 10:50:58 AM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: george76
Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Thursday that with women now eligible to fill combat roles in the military, commanders must justify why any woman might be excluded – and, if women can’t meet any unit’s standard, the Pentagon will ask: “Does it really have to be that high?”

And, thus begins the final push to wreck what has been the best military in the world.

Kids can't pass their finals to graduate? Lower the standards. Too dumb to get into college? Lower the standards. People too fat to be accepted in the military? Lower the standards. Peaople can't meet the standards required of combat soldiers? Lower the standards.

Since lowering the standards for any institution or requirement that the left wants to destroy is what we do, why have them? Why (Constitution aside) have standards for POTUS, Congress, or SCOTUS? Why have standards for lawyers, teachers, dentists, doctors or engineers? Why bother seeking the best of the best instead of the next person in line? What's wrong with having a president who is 4 years-old (Obama)?

This is just the next step in the destruction of this country. As it stands now, our military has been so deeply cut and is stretched so thin that we would have a hard time defeating the military of Holland.

Ignorant foreign governments still send their military here to learn from us so that, in a future war, we may not only have to fight the enemy, but fight our own tactics and strategies as well. Smart. And, when foreign military students take their training elsewhere such as Russia, China or Germany, will that be a wake-up call for us? I doubt it. We will have lowered the standards so much that no one will understand the implications.

If lowering the standards is the left's answer to everything (including citizenship), why not drop the pretense that we're a real country? Let's drop everything that represents America and just become a giant commune with no rules, no borders and no requirements.

If you can't tell, I am beyond disgusted.

23 posted on 01/25/2013 10:51:14 AM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for anti-American criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

How about letting women serve in ‘combat’ units as soon as we have a female JCS or Secretary of Defense.


24 posted on 01/25/2013 10:52:59 AM PST by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

There’s no surprise it happened; what’s surprising it happened that soon.

I would have expected them to wait at least a week.


25 posted on 01/25/2013 10:54:20 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

A nation of subjects doesn’t need standards, except those shifting standards deemed necessary for the permanant control of the state, ie...obamacare, taxation of wealth producers, and social engineering.


26 posted on 01/25/2013 10:59:01 AM PST by TADSLOS ( "I ask sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few politicians."-George Mason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: george76

Ladies and faggots will now be our frontline defense against the barbarians at the gate.....and all our guns will belong to Holder. Good luck, America!


27 posted on 01/25/2013 11:00:09 AM PST by clintonh8r (Happy to be represented by Lt. Col. Allen West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

I think that Hunt forgot the ROI that his Brother blown to sh%t in VN.


28 posted on 01/25/2013 11:00:24 AM PST by Little Bill (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Maybe the Chinese are laughing but the Muzzies are scared to death.

Imagine one of these female soldiers getting their mitts on a Muzzie and castrates him and feeds him his own junk. You really think there will be a hearing?

Arm each woman warrior with a 10 pound slab of bacon and send them into battle. We will have the ME cleaned up in a month.


29 posted on 01/25/2013 11:02:34 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (I own a weapon to protect my family from those wanting to take that weapon away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Weren’t they already letting someone on active duty go through sex change? I was wondering how that was working. Pretty soon the unions will get involved and demand 15 minute breaks on the battlefield and special nursing rooms for mothers.


30 posted on 01/25/2013 11:11:43 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

I knew this was coming. I just thought it would take a few days, maybe a week or two. It only took 24 hours.

All of these people, including the traitorous generals at the top, are deliberately eviscerating our military and our Country.


31 posted on 01/25/2013 11:12:54 AM PST by OldMissileer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

LOL


32 posted on 01/25/2013 11:13:29 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: george76
Would Gen. Dempsey like to serve in combat with a woman who cannot do this?


33 posted on 01/25/2013 11:13:35 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
"let me be clear, we’re not talking about reducing the qualifications for a job...

Riiight. That'll last about 15 seconds. Having lived under several regimes of dual-standard, affirmative-action chicanery, I feel well qualified when I say that once you accept the arguement that social justice goals trump reality, you cannot adhere to a high standard for all. Either you drop standards for some, creating a two-tier regime that engenders contempt and hostility, or you drop standards for all, dramatically lowering the effectiveness of the whole organizationm.

Obviously the DOD has bought into the social justice priority. This will lead to an inevitable and ultimately devastating degradation of the whole force.

If I had a child, I would stongly counsel them to forget any notion of serving in this military. Sorry kids, but we done lost the culture war. All that remains is for us to lose the real one, and I fear that is all but inevitable.

34 posted on 01/25/2013 11:13:42 AM PST by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
-" “Does it really have to be that high?”

WOW!!! Is this from the 'Onion'????

35 posted on 01/25/2013 11:17:58 AM PST by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Even if they don’t admit it, they have already lowered standards. The people who meet the real standards have to take up the slack for those who are unfit.


36 posted on 01/25/2013 11:19:52 AM PST by I want the USA back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Remember, most of the brass that gets up that high are usually asskissers.


37 posted on 01/25/2013 11:21:24 AM PST by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I had to check to see if this article was satire or not.

This is kinda scary.


38 posted on 01/25/2013 11:24:26 AM PST by Delta Dawn (at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA
"Remember, most of the brass that gets up that high are usually asskissers."

Chesty Puller was definitely not an AssKisser he was an Ass Kicker!

39 posted on 01/25/2013 11:38:14 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: george76

“Does it really have to be that high?”

Of course not, there’s nothing better than a lowest common denominator military.

Until it comes up against one of high quality...


40 posted on 01/25/2013 11:43:42 AM PST by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson