Yeah, and the Russians and Chinese are rolling out new designs as we shut our stuff down. I'm sure they'll appreciate our efforts and lay down their arms.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Monty22002
What difference does it make?"
2 posted on
02/08/2013 5:08:58 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(De Oppresso Liber)
To: Monty22002
I’m sure all these “savings” won’t fund the deficit for more than half a day. Obama thinks that we have no need of nuclear weapons.
3 posted on
02/08/2013 5:10:36 AM PST by
rbg81
To: Monty22002
4 posted on
02/08/2013 5:11:58 AM PST by
2001convSVT
(Going Galt as fast as I can.)
To: Monty22002
Billions in savings that could ease the budget deficit. First, you’ve got to have a budget. Second, anyone really believe they won’t just part themselves on the back for their “savings” then go blow that much or more on some dumb-a##ed big government socialist program?
5 posted on
02/08/2013 5:12:55 AM PST by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: Monty22002
Senior Obama administration officials have agreed
Nice they consulted WITH EACH OTHER ;)
6 posted on
02/08/2013 5:20:41 AM PST by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: Monty22002
Obama Administration = Utter FOOLS
7 posted on
02/08/2013 5:31:55 AM PST by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
To: Monty22002
If anyone thinks that voluntarily cutting our Nukes will impress the Russians to cut theirs they are a damned fool.
8 posted on
02/08/2013 5:36:30 AM PST by
Venturer
To: Monty22002
All the predictions in the movie “2016” are coming true
9 posted on
02/08/2013 5:47:34 AM PST by
hillarynot
(I play in Peoria)
To: Monty22002
Good grief. THis man is making Jimmy Carter seem competent in comparison.
To: Monty22002
From the article:
"The results of the internal review havent been announced, but theyre reflected in a proposed classified directive prepared for Obamas signature that details how U.S. nuclear weapons should be targeted against potential foes, according to four people with direct knowledge of the documents content. The sources, who spoke only on the condition of anonymity because they werent authorized to talk to a reporter about the review, described the president as fully on board, but said he hasnt signed the document."
My head just exploded.
I seriously don't know why I follow the news, the insufferable stupidity of this administration and the journalists who propagandize for them is driving me to an early grave.
To: Monty22002
These marxists will not stop until the USA is defenseless. Why don’t we just vote them out? That ought to work, right? It’s worked so well in the past.
14 posted on
02/08/2013 5:59:12 AM PST by
ronnyquest
(I spent 20 years in the Army fighting the enemies of freedom only to see marxism elected at home.)
To: Monty22002
Unilateral disarmament is a key in Obama’s planned destruction of America and her role in the world.
16 posted on
02/08/2013 6:05:05 AM PST by
G Larry
(Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
To: Monty22002; RetroSexual
Obama was reelected so now he has the “flexibility” he was talking about. Vlad got the message and now Obama is delivering. We can use the savings to fund Obamacare.
17 posted on
02/08/2013 6:06:17 AM PST by
kabar
To: Monty22002; onyx; NoGrayZone; cripplecreek; Cringing Negativism Network; MestaMachine
Communist Goals Number 1 2 3 and 4
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
Remember Ubama's Friendship with the Communist Billy Ayers, which was the only thing I ever needed to know about his world view, Ubama is following the plan.
18 posted on
02/08/2013 6:09:13 AM PST by
KC_Lion
(Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
To: Monty22002
I have been wondering why he has not brought this up yet. We all knew he would eventually get around to the subject of a nuke free world (as it applies only to the USA of course).
Obama Vows to Disarm America May 30, 2008
2007 OBAMA:
As president, I will end misguided defense policies and stand with Caucus for Priorities in fighting special interests in Washington. First, I'll stop spending $9 billion a month in Iraq. I'm the only major candidate who opposed this war from the beginning -- and as president, I will end it. Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending. I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems. I will not weaponize space. I will slow our development of future combat systems, and I will institute an independent defense priorities board to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending. Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material, and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals. You know where I stand.
This is why he whispered in Medeved's ear that Russia should wait patiently for King Obama's second term to really see what is coming.
America is over, make plans accordingly.
21 posted on
02/08/2013 6:22:31 AM PST by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Monty22002
Even North Korea is about to test a mobile ICBM and they are posting videos about destroying us with it.
To hell with “conservatives”, Americans need to fight back against the left. They will get us killed, that’s what they do.
22 posted on
02/08/2013 6:40:29 AM PST by
Williams
(No Obama)
To: Monty22002
Yeah, how convenient, with sequestration right around the corner. Smacks of desperation just like every other maneuver this clown tries.
24 posted on
02/08/2013 6:47:09 AM PST by
SueRae
(It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
To: Monty22002
this strategic assessment is brought to you by the same same great academic brains that have brought you TARP, porkulous, Fast and Furious, cash for clunkers, obamacare, Benghazigate, do ask do tell, and the US economy for the past 5 years
Say, shouldn’t countries like Iran and North Korea have to undergo background checks to get a nuke?
25 posted on
02/08/2013 6:49:34 AM PST by
silverleaf
(Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
To: Monty22002
Such a reduction would open the door to billions of dollars in military savings, which might ease the federal budget deficit.
Bull crap!!! It will do NOTHING to ease the deficit. The libs will simply pour the savings into new spending programs.
To: Monty22002
I didn’t think we had any nukes left. How many do we have left? Five?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson