Posted on 02/14/2013 10:13:16 PM PST by Mozilla
The New York Times has a must-read up on how the GOP is losing the tech war — and losing the youth vote.
But tucked away in the piece, I found this:
[W]e can’t be afraid to call out Rush Limbaugh,” said Goodwin’s fiancée, S. E. Cupp, a New York Daily News columnist and a co-host of”The Cycle”on MSNBC. “If we can get three Republicans on three different networks saying, ‘What Rush Limbaugh said is crazy and stupid and dangerous,’ maybe that’ll give other Republicans cover” to denounce the talk-show host as well.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
I think she IS an atheist, I believe I heard her say it once.
If SE Cupp has any fans here, they’re in the wrong place.
WTF?!?!?!??
Her hot factor just dropped to zero....below freezing zero...
If I ever see her on tv again, I’m going to turn the sound off.
Can’t stand the sound of harpies...
I would like Cupp to be more specific about what she wants to call Rush out on. If she has something she should take the lead in her criticisms, and not hide behind “we.”
Ditto
Something went wrong with her. I just can’t trust these light weight bimbos on tv sometimes. I support Rush Limbaugh. S.E. Cupp sounds like Meghan McCain now.
Call him out for what exactly? It’s sometimes handy to know the charges before pronouncing guilt.
“But he’s not particularly deep...”
Please explain, what sort of depth do you feel he is lacking?
They don’t seem to see the disconnect.
Rubio has become a target of liberals therefore he is ok by me at the moment. As Rush says they tell us who they fear. They fear Rubio, I’ll take what I can get.
Bo idea. She didn’t elaborate.
NO idea. She didn’t elaborate.
What I do know for sure is that S.E. Cupp is a plant or a stooge for the forces against us such as Ron Paul and Karl Rove. She was hired to do their work or help out. The New York Times piece said this:
Cupp, who is 33, defines her brand of conservatism as “rational — and optimistic!” She is staunchly anti-abortion but also pro-gay-marriage and a “warheads on foreheads” hawk whose heroes are Barry Goldwater and William F. Buckley Jr. Like many Republicans today — and indeed like liberal Democrats in the 1980s, before Bill Clinton came along and charted a more centrist course — Cupp finds herself in the unenviable position of maintaining that Americans largely side with her party’s worldview, even if their votes suggest otherwise. “Public polling still puts the country center-right on a host of issues,” she told me.
The problem is that her party’s loudest voices sound far more right than center. The voters in Kristen Soltis Anderson’s focus groups condemned Republicans for their unchecked hatred of Obama and for threatening to take away financing for Planned Parenthood, ban abortion, outlaw gay marriage and wage war. From where they stood, at the center-right of S. E. Cupp’s domain, the party had been dragged well out of plain view.
Proximus seeks to marginalize the more strident talking heads by offering itself up to — or if necessary, forcing itself upon — the party as a 21st-century mouthpiece. “If I were training a candidate who’s against gay marriage,” Cupp told me, “I’d say: ‘Don’t change your beliefs, just say legislatively this is not a priority, and I’m not going to take away someone’s right. And if abortion or gay marriage is your No. 1 issue, I’m not your guy.’ ”
I tried to imagine how Cupp’s kinder-gentler message-coaching would go over with the Tea Party, a group that was never mentioned by the young Republicans I spoke with until I broached it. Still, the influence of the far right on the party’s image remains hard to ignore. When I brought up the subject of the Tea Party to Cupp, she said: “People aren’t repelled by the idea of limited government or balancing the budget or lowering taxes. Those Tea Party principles are incredibly popular with the public, even if they don’t know it. Again, that’s a messaging issue, that’s not a principle issue.”
She went on to say, “I don’t think we win by subtraction” — meaning, by casting out the party’s right wing to entice the centrists. Instead, Cupp and her fellow travelers hope to revive Lee Atwater’s bygone “big tent,” under which gay people and Tea Party members and isolationists and neocons would coexist without rancor. But Atwater, the legendary R.N.C. chairman, did not have to worry about freelance voices like Limbaugh and Todd Akin offending whole swaths of emerging demographic groups. Nor during the Atwater era, when Ronald Reagan was president, did the party’s most extreme wing intimidate other Republicans into legislating like extremists themselves, thereby further tarnishing the party’s image. When I mentioned this to the Proximus gathering, Goodwin explained the dilemma faced by Republicans in Congress. “What forces them to vote that way, 9 times out of 10, is a fear of a primary challenge,” he said. “What we hope to accomplish is to bring more voters into Republican primaries, so that it isn’t just the far right that shows up at the polls.”
No wonder we’re doomed. A Guy approves of legalizing illegal aliens and the right supports him regardless.
Well take what you get. Just have the integrity to not complain later.
Since this piece is about voter perception in the last election, I want to point out that perhaps the reason leftist propaganda slime sticks to Republicans is not its accuracy but its sheer volume. Here's an interesting chart (sourced to here) comparing online display ads:
Does anyone think that all those online ads plus 24/7 MSM propaganda might have influenced voter opinion of Republicans?
She’s calling it brave on twitter. How brave is it to hate on Rush? They all do it.
This Goodwin idiot is S.E. Cupp’s fiance and his group called Proximus sounds like a Karl Rove, establishment front to take out the tea party.
The focal point of Proximus’s mission is not policy formulation but how to bring new voters into the fold while remaining true to “conservative” principles. “This is a long-term play,” conceded John Goodwin.
Quote from the article: When I mentioned this to the Proximus gathering, Goodwin explained the dilemma faced by Republicans in Congress. “What forces them to vote that way, 9 times out of 10, is a fear of a primary challenge,” he said. “What we hope to accomplish is to bring more voters into Republican primaries, so that it isn’t just the far right that shows up at the polls.”
Hmmmm ..?? Too bad you all weren’t listening the last couple of days .. he nailed Obama to a T: “He’ll never take responsibility for anything that happens in this country”. It was so good, even Drudge had it up on their website.
I’ve been listening longer than some of you may have been alive, and I can tell you .. he’s the best at discovering what people are really up to.
Some of you might want to listen more often, instead of hearing about what Rush said or didn’t say.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.