Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin Considering Senate Run In 2014
NewsBusters ^ | July 9, 2013 | By Noel Sheppard

Posted on 07/09/2013 3:29:57 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin on Tuesday said that she is considering running for Senate in 2014.

Appearing on Sean Hannity’s radio program, Palin also reiterated that she would consider supporting a third party if Republicans don’t return to their conservative roots (video courtesy MoFoPolitics)

~~snip~~

“I’m glad you brought that up,” she continued, “because Senator Mark Begich (D-Ak.) has got to be replaced. He has not done what he has promised to do for the people of Alaska.”

For those wondering, Begich is up for re-election in 2014.

“If you think that whoever is running doesn’t have the ability to win, and you think you could, would that propel you into the race you think?” asked Hannity.

“Well, I think any American with a heart for service has to always have in the back of their mind that they would do anything, everything that they could to help the cause even if purpose if it’s something that doesn’t look necessarily appealing or necessarily fitting in with a conventional plan that they would try to orchestrate for themselves and their family,” Palin answered. “I along with anybody would have to say that I would do whatever I could to help. And if that was part of that help, then it would have to be considered.”

A poll conducted by Harper Polling in May found Palin leading other Republican primary contenders to face Begich in 2014.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; palin; sarah; sarahpalin; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: TomGuy

The Palins bought a house in AZ because of the very depressed housing market in that state. It was a good buy. They are still Alaskans. Many Northerners own homes in the south just to escape a few months of winter. Nothing political about it.


81 posted on 07/09/2013 9:58:12 PM PDT by upsdriver ( Palin/West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Sarah Palin is not going to run for the Senate, not now, not ever. She is a leader who focuses on results. The Senate is not a place oriented towards achieving results. It is a place good capable leaders go to die.

I believe the only way the Palins will ever choose to live inside the beltway is in the White House.


82 posted on 07/09/2013 10:10:40 PM PDT by upsdriver ( Palin/West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son-Joshua

McCain thinks anyone to the right of him is a “wacko-bird.”

...Darn right I’m a wacko-bird!


83 posted on 07/09/2013 10:48:01 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer; autumnraine
Frankly, I’d like to see that lame theory tested. My anecdotal evidence here in deep blue Illinois (but red in Central IL) is that no one will care about it. Almost everybody I ask either A) doesn’t even know what happened, or B) knows and respects her choice, or C) knows and had no intention of voting for her anyway, based on pure ideology.

Yes, you are correct. This line of reasoning is usually the position of concern trolls(i.e. either Ron or Rand Paul supporters), people who are ignorant and simply are accepting the words of a media that is completely left-wing, or simply a Democrat, Moderate, Progressive, or Marxist who are literally scared out of their mind because they know how much Governor Palin with her sincerity, fidelity to principle, straightforwardness, bluntness and her excellent ability to communicate all of this resonate with the base.

In other words, they know she would wipe the floor with their candidate they are supporting, whether that candidate is some stripe of e-GOP or Left-wing.
84 posted on 07/09/2013 11:08:46 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
While I would love to see her in the Senate, they will nail her on leaving Governorship before term was up.

On the other hand, it would give her a chance to enlighten people on the true story behind why she left. I think that would GAIN her points with the public.

85 posted on 07/09/2013 11:12:03 PM PDT by NurdlyPeon (It is the nature of liberals to pervert whatever they touch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
He has not done what he has promised to do for the people of Alaska.

Is this true? I don't know of anything socialistic that Begich did NOT endorse in his campaign. AK people have two liberal senators who make ol' Ted Stevens seem less bad than he was.

86 posted on 07/10/2013 4:23:59 AM PDT by Theodore R. ("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: amnestynone
66 posted on 7/9/2013 8:14:21 PM by amnestynone: “I would love to see her in the Senate but I understand she is pretty unopular in Alaska so I would hate to see her run and see Begich reelected.”

Is this true? Are there recent polls on Palin’s electability in Alaska?

It's no secret that I've been saying for some time that I think a run for the US Senate could be the best way for Palin to return to the national stage. Even with modern communications and travel, Alaska is so far away from the rest of the “Lower 48” that there are real logistical problems with an incumbent Alaskan governor doing the sort of public speaking and “meet and greet” that is necessary to be politically relevant in the modern American environment. Contrary to some of what is being said here, the US Senate is one of the highest profile megaphones in Washington, D.C., and along with state governorships, has historically been one of the major tracks followed by candidates for the presidency or other national positions. For a resident of a small and isolated state like Alaska, serving in the Senate, especially after time in other state and local offices and the governorship, could be a very good idea.

The complication is that a Sarah Palin run for the US Senate would attract massive national media attention and inject huge amounts of money, not only for her but also for her opponents. We can assume that the Murkowski machine will try to find someone to run against her in the Republican Primary, and the national Democratic Party will raise as much money as they can, not only to defend a current Senate seat but also to prevent Palin from future activities.

If the result of national media attention and tens of millions of dollars of outside money getting injected into the campaign is that Palin loses a race in Alaska, it would be very difficult for her to recover politically.

87 posted on 07/10/2013 4:31:31 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

The question then becomes, can she do more good campaigning for other Republican senate candidates than running for the senate herself? History has shown that Palin has made a difference in senate races in the last few elections. If she’s stumping for other conservatives she could make the difference that could lead to half a dozen new senators. If she runs for the Alaska seat and wins then she brings in just one.


88 posted on 07/10/2013 4:39:46 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Palin/Cruz - The Gang of Two. :~)


89 posted on 07/10/2013 5:39:16 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Please don’t confuse me for a troll. I ADORE Sarah! I just know how they skewered in the media when they DIDN’T have a publicly known issue that doesn’t look that good.

But as other Freepers have pointed out, it would give a reason and outlet to explain it. That is a good point.


90 posted on 07/10/2013 5:49:30 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Awesome.


91 posted on 07/10/2013 5:49:51 AM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina

Is Palin unopular in Alaska? Just go to google and type in “palin unpopular polls” she has been unpopular for quite sometime since resigning the Govenorship.


92 posted on 07/10/2013 8:20:16 AM PDT by amnestynone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Just do it!


93 posted on 07/10/2013 8:39:47 AM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
Please don’t confuse me for a troll. I ADORE Sarah! I just know how they skewered in the media when they DIDN’T have a publicly known issue that doesn’t look that good.

No worries.
94 posted on 07/10/2013 9:21:42 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: All

As a side note to Sarah Palin possibly running for Senate, please consider the following. I don’t know if this scenario is possible in the next election cycle, but if conservatives can win 2/3 majority control of both Houses of Congress in 2014 then they will have the authority under the Constitution’s Clause 2 of Section 7 of Article I to override presidential vetoes. With such power they can repeal constitutonally indefensible Obamacare without Obama’s approval, and also impeach both Obama and actist justices (heck, impeach all the justices). Note that impeaching Obama and justices probably doesn’t require 2/3 support of each House.


95 posted on 07/10/2013 10:50:38 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Go Sarah!


96 posted on 07/10/2013 12:50:52 PM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
When has she NOT made her contributions to America?

Well, that's a pretty hostile response to a benign comment. Sarah -- like it or not [and I don't] -- will never win a national election. She has a shot at a Senate seat and I hope she goes for it.

97 posted on 07/10/2013 4:35:49 PM PDT by BfloGuy (The imposition of a duty on the importation of a commodity burdens the consumers. --Ludwig Von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
When has she NOT made her contributions to America?

Well, that's a pretty hostile response to a benign comment.

Really, are you really such a wuss? You see hostility where there is none. And STILL unable to answer the question, but change the subject and give 'your opinion' on her.

will never win a national election. She has a shot at a Senate seat and I hope she goes for it.

She has more than a shot at anything because she serves a God who directs her path. It's what HE wants for her and not some wuss who has an 'opinion' of her 'options'. God sees the majority chooses to be conned and they have no use for goodness as they stand for nothing. They choose to be useful tools to maggot politicians.

So enjoy being 'used' for you are way too fearful to be any good for anything productive - as a question is considered hostile to you and one you are unable to answer. Hide under a rock because it's going to get worse and you will fold like a cheap suitcase if 'they' ask you a question.

98 posted on 07/10/2013 5:21:14 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
as a question is considered hostile to you and one you are unable to answer. Hide under a rock because it's going to get worse and you will fold like a cheap suitcase if 'they' ask you a question.

I know hostile when I read it. You're hostile for such a self-described Christian.

99 posted on 07/11/2013 4:26:05 PM PDT by BfloGuy (The imposition of a duty on the importation of a commodity burdens the consumers. --Ludwig Von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

Then you saw the hostility in your own post. Next time maybe you will recognize ‘a question’ and be able to answer instead of attacking. But reading your comment on Sarah, I doubt it.

Don’t talk about Christianity - you made it very clear you know nothing about it since all you have done so far is attack.

Sarah and Todd Palin - Mr and Mrs America


100 posted on 07/11/2013 6:04:27 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson