Posted on 08/16/2013 9:39:08 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
Evidence that Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood was directly involved in the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, where Americans including U.S. ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens were killed, continues to mount.
First, on June 26, 2013, I produced and partially translated what purported to be an internal Libyan governmental memo which was leaked and picked up by many Arabic websites. According to this document, the Muslim Brotherhood, including now ousted President Morsi, played a direct role in the Benghazi consulate attack. “Based on confessions derived from some of those arrested at the scene,” asserted the report, six people, “all of them Egyptians” from the jihad group Ansar al-Sharia (Supporters of Islamic Law), were arrested. During interrogations, these Egyptian jihadi cell members:
confessed to very serious and important information concerning the financial sources of the group and the planners of the event and the storming and burning of the U.S. consulate in Benghazi…. And among the more prominent figures whose names were mentioned by cell members during confessions were: Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi; preacher Safwat Hegazi; Saudi businessman Mansour Kadasa, owner of the satellite station, Al-Nas; Egyptian Sheikh Muhammad Hassan; former presidential candidate, Hazim Salih Abu Isma’il…
Four days after this memo appeared, the military-backed June 30 Egyptian revolution took place. Many of the Islamists in the Libyan document have either been arrested—including Safwat Hegazi and Abu Isma’il—or have arrest warrants under terrorism charges.
Walid Shoebat followed up with some important investigative work concerning the Libyan document, including by documenting that Western sources had finally acknowledged that there is a group called Ansar al-Sharia operating in Egypt with a cell in Libya, and that, with the ouster of Muhammad Morsi, it (along with al-Qaeda) had declared jihad on Egypt’s military...
(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...
Sure. As soon as someone explains to America why huma abedine married a small j jew who is also a pervert and chooses to STAY married to him.
.......and a pox on all who inhabite it!
Don’t forget the video which was conveniently available as an excuse. As well as the ad which ran in Afghanistan(?) later in which she and Bozo said they had “Absolutely NOTHING” to do with that video (which in Hillary-speak means they had EVERYTHING to do with the video). I think they had it made, so that it would be ready to go as an excuse for what happened.
There are two major theories concerning the attack on Benghazi. Both appear to be credible. They cannot both be right. At least I don’t see how they can.
The theories:
1. Botched attempt by Morsi to capture Stevens and use him to ransom the Blind Sheik.
2. Successfull (possibly) attempt by al-Qaeda to capture 400 Ground to Air Missiles stored in either the Consulate or the CIA Annex.
Take your pick.
What did Stevens die of? Do we know? Could be smoke inhalation and the bad guys couldn't save him.
It is possible that the hostage-taking of Stevens was the primary motive, and that the SEALs drawing attention to the Annex upon their return resulted in compromise of missiles stored there.
I'm not sure but I believe that the two theories don't involve the same attackers. Different groups. But then again, one of the theories is wrong. Possibly both are wrong. Time will tell. Things keep leaking out.
I don’t doubt that Hillary was in on it. But Stevens was not & tried to take cover in that panic room. When the attackers couldn’t get at him, they set fire to the place. He was just barely alive when the did get to him. If they’d rushed him to the hospital immediately, instead of dragging him in the street & taking pictures, they might have saved him & gotten their hostage.
Or maybe “both”?
I don’t think it was the Seals who spoilt the party. From one of the videos that surfaced that night, we see where Muslims found Stevens, who looked more dead than alive. I think the terrorists themselves spoiled the exchange. Arab websites said Stevens was tortured and raped. I think the animals who had him, went further than kidnapping him and that’s when the party was over. They knew the kidnapping and exchange for the blink sheik would not take place as planned.
We heard from State department employees there was real- time video from the drone and security videos, but we’ve never seen them.
Probably. It was apparently a diesel based fire which is extremely toxic.
What would Obama and Hillary get for releasing the sheikh? They would look like incompetents who lost an ambassador.
If our government was in on the kidnapping, and some have even said Stevens was in on it, then what happened? Everybody’s working on this great plan and it fell apart? And the SEALS were no where around during the supposed kidnapping, so they had no role in disrupting it.
The chance of a plan like that falling apart is too high. Too risky. There are easier ways to accomplish that same result.
It may have been a kidnapping attempt, but probably not to get the sheikh. We still haven’t seen the Benghazi 40. Maybe they are being released back to us for money and weapons.
You can’t get Hillary and Obama to do anything, but they both star in a commercial aired in the Middle East condemning that phony video?
I think a more plausible explanation is that Benghazi was a punch in the nose for Obama and Hillary from Putin. They captured something/somebody and they wanted to be sure that they were dealing DIRECTLY with Hillary and Obama. The way to make sure of this would be to force Hillary and Obama to make that commercial. It would be a brilliant move. Hillary and Obama were seen by millions. There is a visual record.
Yep. No way Stevens was in on it. He fought hard to get additional security, only to be denied by Hillary. Hillary wanted him there on 9/11. That itself is suspect.
They could have traded the body. If both sides were in on the kidnapping, why did it fall apart? The first SEAL doesn’t enter the picture until after Stevens is missing. The SEALs weren’t physically present to disrupt any kidnapping.
Yes, and how did that video become known to Hillary/Obama/Rice/Power gang? Made in obscurity and viewed by only a few dozen by the time Rice laid blame on it it doesn't make sense that it would have come to their attention unless they knew of it beforehand, perhaps even had sub rosa involvement in funding its production?
“Yep. No way Stevens was in on it. He fought hard to get additional security, only to be denied by Hillary. Hillary wanted him there on 9/11. That itself is suspect.”
Knowing that Hillary has dirty and bloody hands, makes what Bush’s daughter said about Hillary that much more disgusting. She called Clinton “unbelievably accomplished”.
This could explain why the Egyptian military acted. They waited almost a year for the U.S. to do something. When they finally realized the U.S. is more pro MB than they even imagined, they took the matter into their own hands.
The only way any Arab nation can be ruled is by dictatorship. And only an Arab dictator will deal with the U.S. Or Arab oil sheiks who owns American politicians.
I’m convinced they had it made. Otherwise, why the stupid ad claiming they had nothing to do with it? The normal reaction to that would be, “Huh? Nobody said you did.” Only someone trying to cover up involvement would say that. It’s like when a kid gets caught doing something and they deny it and you know they are lying but they insist, “I’m not lying!” After they make that statement you’re positive that they’ve just admitted that they did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.