Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Grimes Edging McConnell in Kentucky
RCP ^ | October 17, 2013 | Scott Conroy

Posted on 10/19/2013 12:26:14 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Voters in the Bluegrass State aren't pleased with the state of affairs in Washington, and they appear to be taking it out on Mitch McConnell.

The Senate minority leader narrowly trails Kentucky's Democratic secretary of state, Alison Lundergan Grimes, in his 2014 re-election bid, according to a new survey conducted by the Democratically affiliated Public Policy Polling for progressive group Americans United for Change.

Lundergan Grimes leads McConnell by a two-point margin (45 percent to 43 percent), which is within the poll’s margin of error (plus or minus 2.8 percent). Twelve percent of respondents remained undecided.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: kentucky; lundergangrimes; mattbevin; mitchmcconnell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Our New Monthly Donor Campaign is underway!

Thirty FReeper-Patriots are now
New Monthly Donors.

Generous FReepers have Sponsored
$10 each for each New Monthly Donor!

Donating Monthly is the Ideal way to
Reliably support FR!

Please sign-up here today!

21 posted on 10/19/2013 1:01:30 PM PDT by RedMDer (http://www.dontfundobamacare.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

It seems to me discussion at this point in the game confuses the process a bit. Discussing the Dem challenger as likely or automatically being a win is rather presumptuous at this point.

McConnell has had years of support from Kentucky and it came under the Republican Brand. Because McConnell is a lilly livered power hungry appeasing simp with gravitas and second-banana status points to the obvious to me - that state would not elect a Democrat Senator. I am probably wrong but the history here doesn’t show it.

Now, bring in McConnell’s primary challenger and see what happens. He loses and the challenger rises; it doesn’t automatically follow that Dem candidate wins. Not by a long shot, especially since that 2 or 3 billion in pork is already there and irrevocable in my mind.


22 posted on 10/19/2013 1:06:26 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

No. Leadership seniority is as follows.

Mitch McConnell(KY)
John Cornyn (TX)
John Thune (SD)
John Barrasso (WY)
Roy Blunt (MO)

None of them should be the senate Republican leader.


23 posted on 10/19/2013 1:15:24 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: xzins

We can call it the Luger syndrome. Me-before-party. I lose, I will punish the party I represent.


24 posted on 10/19/2013 1:19:19 PM PDT by ilgipper (Obama is proving that very bad ideas can be wrapped up in pretty words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Switch McConnell may have to run as a DemocRAT.


25 posted on 10/19/2013 1:22:08 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Hold on to your sombrero! Here comes amnesty! The GOP is on a roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

That used to be the case, but we saw Harry Reid victorious despite a horrible rating at home. We saw Bill Nelson here in Florida rocket up from 39% in June 2012 to winning handily in November. We also saw Obama floating in the low-mid 40s a year or so out and cruise to reelection. Enough voters seem to be able to be tricked in the six months before election to forget they are PO’d at their elected official and end up casting another vote for them.


26 posted on 10/19/2013 1:22:14 PM PDT by ilgipper (Obama is proving that very bad ideas can be wrapped up in pretty words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I see it a little different.

While I agree this polling should be taken with a grain of salt, especially with how early it is and how much McConnell is likely to outspend Grimey in the end, he is a serious liability for the same reason Romney was.
The base won’t turn out for Mitch. Kentucky is a red state on the senatorial level. Rand Paul would have no trouble with his reelection. But Mitch is corrupt, and is disliked across all party affiliations.

There isn’t much doubt in my mind at all that if Matt Bevin won the primary, he’d cruise to a 5-6 point victory of the Democrats, and probably a larger margin upon reelection, because Grimes has high name ID, and I think the rats would lack such a challenger next time.

And just to emphasize, Matt Bevin is endorsed by the SCF. He’s a conservative, and an outsider with a lot of spirit. My senses tell me he’d be what Ron Johnson should have been.


27 posted on 10/19/2013 1:22:46 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

“Senator Paul’s win over McConnell’s chosen candidate”

Hold up. You mean incumbent Jim Bunning? The reason Bunning retired was because of McConnell. From what I can tell, Bunning was unpopular in the state (albeit not as unpopular as Mitch right now), and McConnell personally disliked him. He dried up the Kentucky apparatus funds for Bunning and forced him out.

In a weird way, you can thank Mitch that we have Rand Paul.


28 posted on 10/19/2013 1:25:11 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

All I want is that anyone that has the luck, determination - whatever to beat out one of these damned traitorous RINOs goes to Washington DC with a torch to burn down that mess of Country Club Powerati traditions and starts thinking about us out here in the land that Obama and his ilk know nothing about.


29 posted on 10/19/2013 1:26:14 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

Yes, the Reid issue occurred to me as well.

The precedent for party leaders being ousted by losing general elections and not retiring, is not much to look at. They’re just extremely hard to beat, no matter how low they poll. That being said, I do think Grimey could be a spoiler, which is why I back Matt Bevin. He’d win the seat hands down.


30 posted on 10/19/2013 1:27:48 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

They may be the worst politically but PPP finished first out of 28 national polls in predicting the 2012 election result.

http://www.businessinsider.com/most-accurate-polls-of-2012-election-obama-romney-ppp-daily-kos-gallup-rasmussen-2012-11


31 posted on 10/19/2013 1:30:09 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

That’s what happens, Mitch.


32 posted on 10/19/2013 1:30:49 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

All broke up about this.

Why, this calls for broken glass Republicans to walk the precincts to Save Our Guy.

Oh wait....he doesn’t really like us.

Never mind.


33 posted on 10/19/2013 1:36:54 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
We're a year away from the actual election. Between now and then there's going to be a little thing called a campaign that will determine who the eventual winner is.

Grimes may be polling ok now, but anyone who's ever sat on the banks of the Ohio around Louisville and seen the massive tows of coal out on the river knows that a Democrat is going to have a very, very tough time winning a Senate seat.

Gubernatorial elections in KY allow Conservative Democrats to really isolate themselves from their Party and President. Democrats running for Senate don't really have this kind of cover. Grimes had to be bullied and threatened to run against McConnell for just this reason (after Judd ran screaming away in terror) ... she wants to be the next Governor, had an excellent chance of being it, but knows that when McConnell is done with her, her negatives will be incredibly high that she probably won't have a shot.

Grimes, as part of this, is also trying to run to the right of McConnell on coal and guns. Which is about her only option. But being a youngin' she doesn't have the kind of political street cred Joe Manchin built up over YEARS in WV to fully inoculate herself from Obama's coal policies and the big gun control push.

So I'd take any suggestion that Bevin is a better candidate because he'll have a better shot at beating Grimes than McConnell will with a well-deserved grain of salt. But it also goes without saying that Bevin's much more of a palatable Conservative candidate than McConnell is. Plenty of reason to support Bevin based on ideology, rather than electability.
34 posted on 10/19/2013 1:45:44 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

This is one poll i wouldnt worry about


35 posted on 10/19/2013 1:47:39 PM PDT by italianquaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bratch
In fact, some folks think one of the biggest reasons that the Kentucky governorship has remained in the hands of Democrats

More rationale to ditch the 17th amendment. With a Conservative legislature, mcabominable would be gone.

36 posted on 10/19/2013 1:49:59 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

Yeah, me either.


37 posted on 10/19/2013 1:51:29 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

I guess I don’t understand what the definition of “seniority” is, since McCain has been a senator since 1987 and Cornyn since 2002.


38 posted on 10/19/2013 2:00:44 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Basically, having a Dim in this spot ain’t much worse than having this slime bag in office. One and the same.


39 posted on 10/19/2013 2:02:29 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (I am proud to be a Christian and follower of my Lord Jesus Christ. Time is short for U to know Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Yeah, I’m not talking about age seniority (otherwise Thad Cochran would be some kind of king), but leadership seniority or rank. McLame for reasons unbeknownst to me has never been part of the leadership to my knowledge, though someone with more knowledge might correct me.


40 posted on 10/19/2013 2:05:26 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson