Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Quarterback of Obamacare Doesn’t Like the GOP Senators’ Alternative
The Weekly Standard ^ | February 3, 2014 | Jeffrey H. Anderson

Posted on 02/06/2014 8:10:07 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Ezekiel Emanuel—Rahm’s older brother and the man who, as far back as 2009, current Nebraska Senate candidate Ben Sasse warned was “quarterbacking the details” of Obamacare—has authored a New York Times op-ed in which he criticizes the proposed alternative released last week by Senators Coburn, Burr, and Hatch. Emanuel, a rather feisty fellow (see his Fox News exchange with Jim Capretta—during which he admitted that, under Obamacare, the “individual market is going away”), has written some, well, provocative things about what he calls the “allocation of scarce medical interventions.” For example, he’d prioritize the lives of the young over the old, but would nevertheless prioritize the lives of adolescents over infants. That’s because adolescents “have received substantial education and parental care, investments that will be wasted without a complete life. Infants by contrast, have not yet received these investments.” Yes, that’s who designed Obamacare, with all of its central planning and government control over Americans’ health-care decisions and their lives. (Feel better now?)

Emanuel’s musings about the relative value of distinct human lives might make one think of Obamacare’s unelected and largely unaccountable Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), one of the myriad notorious features of Obamacare that Americans would be freed from under the Coburn-Burr-Hatch alternative. Others include (to list just a few) Obamacare’s job-killing employer mandate (which President Obama, at his whim, has lawlessly refused to execute as written); its war on doctors (Obamacare bans, for example, the building or expanding of doctor-owned hospitals); its taxpayer-funded bailout of big insurance companies; and, of course, its historically unprecedented individual mandate, which says that—for the first time in United States history—private American citizens must buy a product or service of the federal government’s choosing....

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: 0carenightmare; deathpanels; ezekielemanuel; ipab; laborforce; obama; obamacare

1 posted on 02/06/2014 8:10:07 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Screw him and his death wishes.


2 posted on 02/06/2014 8:14:34 AM PST by b4its2late (A Progressive is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Dr. Mengle reincarnated!


3 posted on 02/06/2014 8:17:09 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t like them either. They are trying to pull Obastard’s biscuits out of the fire, thus spreading the taint of the failed programs onto themselves, and us.


4 posted on 02/06/2014 8:24:17 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

E-Z-Kill


5 posted on 02/06/2014 8:25:03 AM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ezekiel Emanuel, Boo Radley’s brother.


6 posted on 02/06/2014 8:26:54 AM PST by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
". . . he’d prioritize the lives of the young over the old, but would nevertheless prioritize the lives of adolescents over infants. That’s because adolescents 'have received substantial education and parental care, investments that will be wasted without a complete life. Infants by contrast, have not yet received these investments.'

Is it possible to find a statement from an influential U. S. government spokesman which so clearly ignores, refutes, and objects to the very premise of the American philosophical foundation, that "All men are endowed by their Creator . . . ." with life, liberty and the right to pursue happiness as individuals?

To Emanuel and the "progressive" regressives he represents in the current Administration, the individual life is valued only with regard to the value imperfect human beings like himself have placed upon it--based on their likewise imperfect formula for determining that value.

Shameful!!!

7 posted on 02/06/2014 8:27:49 AM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Creepy Ezekiel is Dr. Kervorkian mini me. He is VERY DANGEROUS.....Democrats are the culture of DEATH.....EXCEPT for COP KILLERS!!


8 posted on 02/06/2014 8:28:59 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Quarterback of Obamacare Doesn’t Like the GOP Senators’ Alternative

I don't like it either. It's Obamacare lite. It has all the potential to be as expensive as Obamacare with it's subsidies and tax credits. It increases in my taxes. It'll drive companies towards dropping their healthcare and dumping people on the government plan, just like Obamacare does. It's not a solution.

9 posted on 02/06/2014 8:32:58 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why would one even consider asking HIS opinion? Good grief! No Marxist is going to like a free-market plan. That is a no-brainer! We don’t need his opinion, nor do we need Obama’s. This needs to pass, and if it doesn’t, then it needs to be reintroduced in 2015, after the new Congress is in session.


10 posted on 02/06/2014 8:33:59 AM PST by Shery (in APO Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Here is a substantial real world reason why having rights “endowed by the Creator” is so essential to civil society. It is the very thing that stands in the way of the Progressive design to totally control society; to be run by experts like Emanuel.


11 posted on 02/06/2014 8:35:51 AM PST by McBuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CMailBag

Yep, that would be that dude.


12 posted on 02/06/2014 8:36:07 AM PST by b4its2late (A Progressive is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is the kind of person who should be dragged out into the streets and shot.

How many lives will be lost because of this one man?

13 posted on 02/06/2014 8:39:14 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2
To Emanuel and the "progressive" regressives he represents in the current Administration, the individual life is valued only with regard to the value imperfect human beings like himself have placed upon it--based on their likewise imperfect formula for determining that value.

My humble simplistic impression is: As long as you're on the treadmill paying taxes, you'll get treatment. As soon as you're off the treadmill, you're a liability.
14 posted on 02/06/2014 8:52:25 AM PST by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
They are trying to pull Obastard’s biscuits out of the fire, thus spreading the taint of the failed programs onto themselves, and us.

The Coburn-Burr-Hatch plan is no solution to the Obamacare mess.

The solution lies in getting the government out of healthcare, not employing government to fix a problem government created.

15 posted on 02/06/2014 9:02:04 AM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media -- IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This GOPe “alternative” doesn’t repeal or reform anything: pre-existing conditions remain ,community ratings remain, tax credits still given to corporations for health insurance (instead of to the individials-IE-no portability)

It’s a joke.


16 posted on 02/06/2014 9:19:50 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The author spends a lot of time on policy pricing, but to me the most hateful aspect is that I am forced to buy a product which is useless to me. In effect, the policies available have such outrageously high deductibles that it is really just catastrophic insurance. I will be FORCED to pay for an expensive but useless POS that will provide zero benefits to me except in a major catastrophe.


17 posted on 02/06/2014 11:19:02 AM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McBuff; Shery
"Here is a substantial real world reason why having rights “endowed by the Creator” is so essential to civil society. It is the very thing that stands in the way of the Progressive design to totally control society; to be run by experts like Emanuel."

Well stated. See my post above.

In the Post just above yours, Shery makes this comment: "Why would anyone even consider asking HIS opinion?"

The answer so-called "progressives" would give is that Emanuel is known as the "architect" of the plan.

On the other hand, for true conservatives, HIS opinion underlies the very reason those who love the ideas of America's foundations in liberty, who treasure the life of the most innocent and vulnerable in the society, and who see the Hand of the Creator, NOT some pre-supposed "value" placed on human life by folks like Emanuel and the current Administration must understand what he so clearly enunciated in the statement included in this article as being the very antithesis of respect for our Constitution's protections, as framed on the foundation outlined in the Declaration of Independence from tyranny.

18 posted on 02/06/2014 11:21:48 AM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2
Is it possible to find a statement from an influential U. S. government spokesman which so clearly ignores, refutes, and objects to the very premise of the American philosophical foundation, that "All men are endowed by their Creator . . . ." with life, liberty and the right to pursue happiness as individuals?

Even better said!!

It is no coincidence that early Progressives like Woodrow Wilson and Goodnow openly railed against the Founder's adherence to the "laws of nature and nature's God." Nor is it a coincidence that the 5th article of the Humanist Manifesto (signed by John Dewey, btw, the father of the modern education system) states: "Humanism asserts that the nature of the universe depicted by modern science makes unacceptable any supernatural or cosmic guarantees of human values."

Our freedoms have been under assault for quite some time.

19 posted on 02/06/2014 12:51:00 PM PST by McBuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson