Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge: Yes, Arizona and Kansas can require voters to prove their citizenship
Hotair ^ | 03/19/2014 | Erika Johnsen

Posted on 03/19/2014 7:20:52 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Under the oh so august leadership of Attorney General Eric Holder, the Obama administration has been doing their very best to thwart various states in their individual endeavors to implement voter ID laws. In this latest iteration of that ongoing battle, the Federal Election Assistance Commission has so far refused to help state officials in Kansas and Arizona change federal election registration forms to include proof of citizenship. Both states have new voter-ID measures measures that require new voters to provide a birth certificate, passport, or other documentation to prove their citizenship, while the federal registration form only requires that new voters sign a statement declaring that they are citizens. On Wednesday, a federal judge basically told the Obama administration to stop deliberately getting in the states’ way on this one, via the LA Times:

A federal judge has ruled that Kansas and Arizona should be allowed to require voters to provide evidence of U.S. citizenship, in a case closely watched by both sides dealing with the question of voter eligibility.

U.S. District Judge Eric Melgren in Wichita, Kan., ruled that the U.S. Election Assistance Commission had no legal authority to deny requests from the two states to add the citizenship requirement. In the ruling, released Wednesday, he ordered the commission to revise the national form immediately. …

“This is a huge victory for the states of Kansas and Arizona,” Kobach said in a prepared statement emailed to reporters. “They have successfully protected our sovereign right to set and enforce the qualifications for registering to vote. We have now paved the way for all 50 states to protect their voter rolls and ensure that only U.S. citizens can vote.”

“Today’s decision is an important victory for the people of Arizona against the Obama administration, assuring that only Arizona residents and not illegals vote in Arizona elections,” Arizona Atty. Gen. Tom Horne said in a statement.

“Only Arizona residents and not illegals”? Well, that of course is just ridiculous, because as we know perfectly well by now — we know, because progressives continuously tell us so — voter fraud is absolutely not a real thing. Voter-ID laws are just vacuous excuses made up by Republicans in order to maliciously disenfranchise minority voters. “Proof of citizenship” requirement? Ha! I mean, can you say “racist dog whistle”?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Mexico; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: aliens; citizenship; electionfraud; elections; illegals; votefraud; voterfraud; voting

1 posted on 03/19/2014 7:20:52 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AZamericonnie; HiJinx

AZ ping


2 posted on 03/19/2014 7:30:01 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

’ - - - U.S. District Judge Eric Melgren in Wichita, Kan., ruled that the U.S. Election Assistance Commission had no legal authority to deny requests from the two states to add the citizenship requirement. - - - “

Obviously Melgren not an Obama appointed Judge.


3 posted on 03/19/2014 7:33:33 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We live in Bizarro World.


4 posted on 03/19/2014 7:34:11 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ruh roh! The Regime has a rogue judge on their hands.


5 posted on 03/19/2014 7:35:25 PM PDT by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Shouldnt need a court case for this huh.


6 posted on 03/19/2014 7:39:33 PM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

ID is required for every meaningful process, so why nothing is required to vote? Makes no sense.


7 posted on 03/19/2014 7:40:16 PM PDT by entropy12 (If you did not vote, you helped elect the community organizer from south side of Chicago.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Bookmark


8 posted on 03/19/2014 7:43:19 PM PDT by publius911 ( At least Nixon had the good g race to resign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

An extremely important decision.


9 posted on 03/19/2014 7:44:25 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
ID is required for every meaningful process, so why nothing is required to vote? Makes no sense.

It makes no sense to those with integrity.

On the other hand, there is today's politician.

10 posted on 03/19/2014 7:47:31 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
had no legal authority

Wait, is that a refusal of jurisdiction? Wow!
11 posted on 03/19/2014 7:52:17 PM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This has gone too far. Next thing you know, these bigots will be denying dead people their voting rights.


12 posted on 03/19/2014 7:55:06 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Elections in this country are a joke!


13 posted on 03/19/2014 8:04:39 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Communism kills!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

What happens when it gets to the Supreme Court?


14 posted on 03/19/2014 8:31:47 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
High Court will dodge the question.
That’s my guess...
15 posted on 03/19/2014 9:03:29 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

What happens when it gets to the Supreme Court?

Roberts will rule that its a tax.


16 posted on 03/20/2014 7:04:17 AM PDT by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson