Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So George W. Bush isn't a monster, after all
Yahoo News ^ | 5/8/14 | Matt Bai

Posted on 05/08/2014 9:51:24 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue

If you've just crash-landed from the planet known as Kepler-186f and have no experience with the human life form or its recent history, let me just clarify something for you: George W. Bush was a divisive and unsuccessful president. Economically, internationally, culturally — you name the category of leadership, and the results pretty much range from disappointment to disaster. A CBS News/New York Times poll clocked Bush's final approval rating at 22 percent, which is about as low as you can go in politics without needing a parole officer.

You may get confused about this, because lately Bush is enjoying a public restoration. The Bush you read about these days is the kind of inclusive conservative you can deal with, a guy who bikes with wounded veterans, a sensitive portraitist of world leaders. A graphic this week on FiveThirtyEight.com showed how fewer and fewer Americans blame Bush for the country's economic morass, even though his successor, Barack Obama, won two presidential campaigns based on precisely that premise.

Bush's critics will argue that this is testament to how quickly we forget the past. But it has more to do, really, with how we distort the present.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush43; dubya; georgewbush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: StolarStorm

To choose between Bush and Obama, I wouldn’t just crawl over broken glass or walk across hot coals (pick your metaphor), I’d EAT broken glass and hot coals and I’d do it ... here it comes ... every day of the week and twice on Sunday.


61 posted on 05/08/2014 5:41:57 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Now that Bush came out last summer and intimated that people who were against gay marriage are bad, I’m sure the media will view him more favorably. If he comes out full bore anti-conservative and anti-Christian like he’d like to, is stock will go way up.


62 posted on 05/08/2014 5:42:15 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Heck, by comparison to Obama, our seasoned citizens should remember the good ole Carter years. Are we gonna regress all the way back to Nixon with his wage and price controls ? Ah. The Nixon years, where the EPA and AGW all got their start. The EPA is their church. Anti-humanism is their religion. And the AGW theory is their bible. And apparently the Koch Bros are their Emmanuel Goldstein. So we have regressed back to 1980. Boy do we need a Reagan now.


63 posted on 05/08/2014 5:42:47 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

The yellow cake was sold to a Canadian Company, it was reported on AP and ignored by the media.


64 posted on 05/08/2014 6:10:12 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster
I don't think we should have gotten in Iraq -- not in the 90s, nor in the 2000s -- Saddam was a threat to the region, to Iran and Saudi arabia which is why Bush senior went after him

If Bush I had not interfered then Saddam would have used his robbings from Kuwait to fund a new war with Iran, possibly defeating it (with the USSR out of the picture)

He would also have held the Saudis to ransom

Oh and finally, the Islamic jihadis hated him, so they would have tried to get him and he would have used his characteristic mustard gas attacks on them

And there would still be 2 million Christians in Iraq living safely rather than 200,000 and dropping under danger from jihadis

65 posted on 05/08/2014 9:56:10 PM PDT by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Comparing Bush to Obama?

Not possible

Compare Carter to Obama -- now that's a better comparison...

66 posted on 05/08/2014 9:56:53 PM PDT by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue; sickoflibs

He’s a RINO and was a poor leader. He looks good now only because Obama is the worst President in history.

Much in the way a filthy pond with garbage floating in it would look pretty good if you were on fire.


67 posted on 05/09/2014 12:28:38 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

My Millard Fillmore memorabilia collection salutes you.


68 posted on 05/09/2014 5:08:22 AM PDT by Scoutmaster (Is it solipsistic in here, or is it just me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster
Seriously? You have a Millard Fillmore memorabilia collection? He's the butt of many jokes and gets beat up by historians for not being more activist.

But, seriously, he was one of the better presidents when it came to adherence to the constitution and p*ssing a lot of “living document constitution” types off who deserved to be p*ssed off.

John Tyler was another, but his legacy is somewhat tainted by his ties to the secessionist movement in his final year on earth.

69 posted on 05/09/2014 5:31:24 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm
...so we don’t make the same mistakes.

So please America not another Bush or Clinton.

70 posted on 05/09/2014 7:54:47 AM PDT by thirst4truth (Life without God is like an unsharpened pencil - it has no point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

That’s how its always been done - vilify the guy with the hard medicine and apologize to him over the corpse.


71 posted on 05/09/2014 7:57:09 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Semi-secular Arab strongmen/dictators are sadly what is best for that region. They scare the Saudis (Which is fine by me), keep Iran in check (UN screwed the pooch in the '80s by holding Hussein back when Iraq gained the strategic advantage) and tend to keep "religious order" better than any Western "infiltrator" trying to "establish democracy" and nation build.

Muslims are a counter-hegemonic force that the West tries to desperately tame, but their "good intentions" make the situation far worse in the long run.
72 posted on 05/09/2014 8:23:50 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
but I hope to never see another Bush in politics again.

You must not be from TX, where the uninformed are poised to launch George P. in January 2015.

73 posted on 05/09/2014 9:13:12 AM PDT by Theodore R. (It was inevitable: Texans will always be for Cornball and George P.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson