Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unearthed Audio: Hillary Discusses Defending Child Rapist
Town Hall ^ | 6/16/14 | Guy Benson

Posted on 06/16/2014 3:50:17 PM PDT by OneVike



A scoop from the Washington Free Beacon's Alana Goodman exploded on Twitter Sunday night, raising new questions about the most significant case of Hillary Clinton's relatively brief legal career. The brewing controversy is, in some respects, ancient history -- involving a mid-80's interview about a case from 1975. In short, young attorney Hillary Rodham elected to take a case defending a man accused of brutally raping a 12-year-old girl. Goodman reports, "the recordings, which...have never before been reported, include Clinton’s suggestion that she knew Taylor was guilty at the time. She says she used a legal technicality to plead her client, who faced 30 years to life in prison, down to a lesser charge." None of this is per se scandalous. Indeed, attorneys are ethically obliged to furnish their clients, no matter how vile, with zealous legal representation. One can argue that lawyers have no such obligation to take on a case in the first place, which is true, but that doesn't strike me as a fair critique here. Hillary explains in the audio recording that she accepted the "tough" client as a favor to the local prosecutor. But her defense of the alleged rapist (whom she clearly believed to be guilty), and the manner in which she secured a very favorable plea bargain, is another story altogether -- as is her demeanor and tone in recounting the case in a previously-undisclosed interview:

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: democratwaronwomen; hillary; hillary2016; hillaryradical; prorape; rapist; therealwaronwomen; waronchildren
I have often times asked that, If a popular Democrat politician were involved in any way of sexual abusing, or even just defending a sexual abuser of children, would the Democrat voters still support said politician? Well, here we have a case where Hilary Clinton helped a child rapist get less than 1 year in county jail.
1 posted on 06/16/2014 3:50:17 PM PDT by OneVike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Democrat voters?

In the 1980s, after Gerry Studds was caught having homo sex with a young Congressional page, his popularity skyrocketed in MA. Ditto for Barney Frank after the flap about running the gay brothel out of his house.

Liberals don’t think along the same lines as Americans.


2 posted on 06/16/2014 3:56:49 PM PDT by ScottinVA (If it doesn't include border security, it isn't "reform." It's called "amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
Indeed, attorneys are ethically obliged to furnish their clients, no matter how vile, with zealous legal representation.

...And meet the number one reason why lawyers are despised! They can, will, and insist they must work overtime to thwart justice....

3 posted on 06/16/2014 3:58:56 PM PDT by Yossarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

As much as I dislike Hitlery she did exactly as an good attorney would and should do.
Yes the man was despicable and guilty but she did a good job as an attorney.


4 posted on 06/16/2014 3:58:56 PM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger

She did not have to take the case. She took it only because a Democrat DA asked her to.

It was political on her part from the beginning.


5 posted on 06/16/2014 4:00:41 PM PDT by OneVike (I'm just a Christian waiting for a ride home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Democrats have no moral that they are not willing to violate in order to have control of the America. And being amoral, there is nothing they will not do to keep power. Nothing.


6 posted on 06/16/2014 4:00:59 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
Liberals don’t think along the same lines as Americans.

Exactly.

7 posted on 06/16/2014 4:01:25 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

This was released with the permission of Hitlery herself, because the people that support her are SCHMUCKS, and they will forget all about it come 2016. And if it is brought up again, they will say “old news” .


8 posted on 06/16/2014 4:03:31 PM PDT by Captainpaintball (Immigration without assimilation is the death of a nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

It seems her life has had more rapists in it than I realized.


9 posted on 06/16/2014 4:05:16 PM PDT by Track9 (hey Kalid.. kalid.. bang you're dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
There is another thread dealing with the same subject matter.


10 posted on 06/16/2014 4:06:52 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

The victim wasn’t Hillary’s 12 year old daughter...


11 posted on 06/16/2014 4:07:01 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Unearthed Hitlery;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM9XGx9xerA


12 posted on 06/16/2014 4:07:21 PM PDT by Vinylly (?%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

The woman was fired because she didn't meet the minimum ethical standards to be a lawyer - to be a lawyer?

Who knew they even had standards...

13 posted on 06/16/2014 4:07:39 PM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Historians will refer to this administration as "The Half-Black Plague.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball

I saved it to my HD, Which is fixed now. So I can post it on youtube in 2016. I think everyone should save it, and post it so it go viral in 2016 so she cannot run from it.


14 posted on 06/16/2014 4:10:12 PM PDT by OneVike (I'm just a Christian waiting for a ride home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Thanks nathan.

I did a search and it never came up so I went ahead and posted it.

I thought it odd that it wasn’t.


15 posted on 06/16/2014 4:11:37 PM PDT by OneVike (I'm just a Christian waiting for a ride home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

You pointed out
‘She did not have to take the case. She took it only because a Democrat DA asked her to.

It was political on her part from the beginning.”

think about it , do you think the Dem DA expected her to win the case?
Good defense attorneys do things we might not like but our system does provide even the vilest a defense
In this case the vilest man was defended by a vile woman


16 posted on 06/16/2014 4:13:12 PM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

bump


17 posted on 06/16/2014 4:17:37 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger

My whole deal is, the way she constantly uses the children to get what she wants.

Well, I would like to see this played everytime she says its for the children.


18 posted on 06/16/2014 4:19:41 PM PDT by OneVike (I'm just a Christian waiting for a ride home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
I think yours is a different article, I just meant to say that there were comments on another thread.


19 posted on 06/16/2014 4:24:41 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

that is a good point
and she is despicable
but in this instance she did what a good attorney should do


20 posted on 06/16/2014 4:27:57 PM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Did she guidance to do that from the Bible?


21 posted on 06/16/2014 4:28:38 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Yea, I checked to other out and read the comments, but I realized it was different. That’s why it did not come up when i did a search.


22 posted on 06/16/2014 4:30:44 PM PDT by OneVike (I'm just a Christian waiting for a ride home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All
Hillary makes it to the top---almost.


23 posted on 06/16/2014 4:37:36 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

In fairness, no matter what crime someone is accused of they should have access to a competent and effective defense. Othwerwise we’d be some third world nation like Saudi Arabia where political opponents can be accused of sorcery and summarily executed.


24 posted on 06/16/2014 4:43:27 PM PDT by MeganC (Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Bill Clinton identified in lawsuit against his former friend and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein who had ‘regular’ orgies at his Caribbean compound that the former president visited multiple times
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584309/Bill-Clinton-identified-lawsuit-against-former-friend-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-regular-orgies-Caribbean-compound-former-president-visited-multiple-times.html

Billionaire Pedophile Goes Free
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2010/07/20/jeffrey-epstein-billionaire-pedophile-goes-free.html


25 posted on 06/16/2014 4:49:14 PM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

—Liberals don’t think along the same lines as Americans—

I like that line. I may just have to steal that line for my tag.


26 posted on 06/16/2014 4:51:26 PM PDT by rightly_dividing (Looking for a good tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

OH no no no no. I can’t stand the Hildabeast, and I was a Prosecutor for 25 years ... but this is what Defense Attys do! They defend the guilty. And if they don’t, they can get disbarred. This is NOT an argument for ANYTHING. What, you want attorney’s deciding who is guilty and innocent? Every single Defense atty does this. maybe doctors should decide who is worthy to live?

This is a ridiculous point and argument.


27 posted on 06/16/2014 5:05:51 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger

“...she did exactly as an good attorney would and should do”

That may be true, but it certainly plays into the stereotype
of a conniving, cynical, weasel lawyer. Lawyers can be good without that snarky arrogant attitude.


28 posted on 06/16/2014 5:39:36 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Are we really surprised?
Mrs. Clinton has a long history of defending and standing by rapists.


29 posted on 06/16/2014 5:53:26 PM PDT by Sam Hains (Tea up support for McDaniel, Carr, Wolf, and Shannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford; All

Who was the person she defended, and what happened to him? Rapists seldom stop raping.


30 posted on 06/16/2014 5:58:34 PM PDT by marktwain (The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: OneVike; RWGinger
She did not have to take the case. She took it only because a Democrat DA asked her to

Here are the relevant provisions from the ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility (1983):

EC 2-27: History is replete with instances of distinguished and sacrificial services by lawyers who have represented unpopular clients and causes. Regardless of his personal feelings, a lawyer should not decline representation because a client or a cause is unpopular or community reaction is adverse.

EC 2-29: When a lawyer is appointed by a court or requested by a bar association to undertake representation of a person unable to obtain counsel, whether for financial or other reasons, he should not seek to be excused from undertaking the representation except for compelling reasons. Compelling reasons do not include such factors as the repugnance of the subject matter of the proceeding, the identity or position of a person involved in the case, the belief of the lawyer that the defendant in a criminal proceeding is guilty, or the belief of the lawyer regarding the merits of the civil case.

EC 2-30 Employment should not be accepted by a lawyer when he is unable to render competent service or when he knows or it is obvious that the person seeking to employ him desires to institute or maintain an action merely for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring another. Likewise, a lawyer should decline employment if the intensity of his personal feeling, as distinguished from a community attitude, may impair his effective representation of a prospective client...

31 posted on 06/16/2014 6:11:24 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

You are thinking defensively. Read this again and ask yourself did you find humor in the awful aspects of your job?

-—It’s one thing to agree to take on an unsavory client and to fulfill one’s professional and ethical obligations. It’s another matter to have a strange retrospective chuckle about benefiting from a turn of events that let a child rapist off the hook. -—


32 posted on 06/16/2014 6:29:23 PM PDT by sgtyork (Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Lame prosecutor. Had the opportunity to knock some of the shine off this serpent early on and didn’t.


33 posted on 06/16/2014 7:27:56 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman

The woman was fired because she didn’t meet the minimum ethical standards to be a lawyer - to be a lawyer?

Who knew they even had standards...

********************

Clients don’t want them.


34 posted on 06/16/2014 7:30:11 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

I just read where her law license in Arkansas was suspended in 2002.......https://attorneyinfo.aoc.arkansas.gov/info/Attorney/Attorney_Search_Detail.aspx?ID=6b117de4-d562-4e17-adc8-104aabe831d2


35 posted on 06/16/2014 7:32:24 PM PDT by soozla (Truth prevails, regardless of who is willing to accept it – now, or later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

...And meet the number one reason why lawyers are despised!


Yup. Everyone hates them,,,until they need one.


36 posted on 06/16/2014 8:06:37 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rightly_dividing

“I like that line. I may just have to steal that line for my tag.”

You’re welcome to it!”


37 posted on 06/16/2014 8:28:40 PM PDT by ScottinVA (If it doesn't include border security, it isn't "reform." It's called "amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Thanks.


38 posted on 06/16/2014 8:32:03 PM PDT by rightly_dividing (Liberals don’t think along the same lines as Americans--FReeper ScottinVA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Rapist? Rapist? What does Hillary know about rapi....Oh! I forgot...


39 posted on 06/16/2014 8:32:12 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike; GeronL
One can argue that lawyers have no such obligation to take on a case in the first place, which is true

For now, someday I expect to see a homosexual couple claim "discrimination" because some lawyer won't take their case to challenge existing marriage laws.

40 posted on 06/17/2014 5:31:54 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger

Attorneys sell out their clients all the time. They have to play nice with the prosecutors to win other cases.


41 posted on 06/17/2014 5:32:50 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson