Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Demsí Plan B disintegrates: Bill to reverse Hobby Lobby ruling canít clear filibuster
The Washington Times ^ | July 16, 2014 | Tom Howell Jr.

Posted on 07/16/2014 12:57:54 PM PDT by jazusamo

Senate Democrats’ effort to reverse the Supreme Court’s “Hobby Lobby” ruling on birth control could not overcome a Republican filibuster Wednesday, exposing the partisan divide over how to balance women’s health rights with religious liberty ahead of November’s congressional contests.

The chamber’s 56-43 vote was not enough to green-light the “Not My Boss’ Business Act” for final consideration, even though Republicans Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Mark Kirk of Illinois and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska broke party ranks and voted to put the bill on the floor.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, changed his vote to “no” at the last minute so he could once more bring up the bill, which would require corporations to insure birth control or other legally mandated services when offering health plans.

“It’s an essential part of women’s health and should be part of an employee’s package, and not something she has to go and add on later,” Sen. Maria Cantwell, Washington Democrat, said.

The legislation authored by Democratic Sens. Patty Murray of Washington and Mark Udall of Colorado was more political than practical — the Republican-led House would not have taken up the measure.

But it provided Democrats a way to woo women voters amid fears of poor turnout this fall.

The party says the bill is necessary because an all-male majority of the Supreme Court ruled owners of closely held corporations do not have to insure forms of birth control that violate their moral beliefs.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; democrats; filibuster; hobbylobby; planb; ussenate
The Rats political stunt didn't last long.

Collins, Kirk, Murkowski vote with Rats. Sigh

1 posted on 07/16/2014 12:57:54 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

No fan of the RINOs but I suspect they voted yes to force the democrat’s hand at which point Hairy Roid voted NO.


2 posted on 07/16/2014 1:03:14 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Wasn’t Harry Reid able to invoke the “nuclear option”, to blow up the filibuster once and for all, making everything a simple majority?


3 posted on 07/16/2014 1:05:21 PM PDT by alloysteel (Most people become who they promised they would never be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Health rights? Abortion is very unhealthy for the baby.


4 posted on 07/16/2014 1:05:55 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

>>>Collins, Kirk, Murkowski vote with Rats. Sigh <<<

Actually, Collinrat, Kirkrat and Murkowskirat voted with the other rats.

Nothing to be surprised at or sigh . . . these are all democrats wearing republican robes, or more correctly - wolves in sheep’s clothing.


5 posted on 07/16/2014 1:06:12 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Health rights? Abortion is very unhealthy for the baby.

AMEN to that.

6 posted on 07/16/2014 1:08:14 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

He only did so for nominations, not for routine business.


7 posted on 07/16/2014 1:08:16 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Well, they didn't say it was a good plan!

That's why it was Plan B!

8 posted on 07/16/2014 1:10:13 PM PDT by uglybiker (nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-BATMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress

Bump.


9 posted on 07/16/2014 1:10:20 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It worked perfectly. It will come up again in September after normal schedules return as an election time issue to stoke anger among the Sarah Flucke types and drive the angriest horn dogs to the polls.


10 posted on 07/16/2014 1:13:44 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

11 posted on 07/16/2014 1:14:45 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Since they are discussing “Women’s Health”, how about this suggestion for preventative medicine. When you lay down cross your legs.


12 posted on 07/16/2014 1:18:57 PM PDT by billhilly (Its OK, the left hated Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Harry . . . here is a simple solution, just invoke another nuclear option and make yourself and your party the sole decision making body in America . . . please, please do - and then come November, when WE are the majority we can impeach the whole lot of you including your halfrican boss. We won’t even drag it out!


13 posted on 07/16/2014 1:20:57 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

Yep, doesn’t cost a cent and it’s 100% effective.


14 posted on 07/16/2014 1:21:21 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Well, not 100% effective. There was that one woman 2014 years ago.
But there are exceptions to every rule.


15 posted on 07/16/2014 1:39:40 PM PDT by christx30 (Freedom above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: christx30

So true, and then in modern times there’s that dastardly toilet seat. :-)


16 posted on 07/16/2014 1:42:36 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

All the RATS have anymore are stunts. Well lies and stunts.


17 posted on 07/16/2014 1:44:58 PM PDT by uncitizen (Buckle up! We're on the Facism Fast Track!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
This law would give the HHS Secretary, Sylvia Mathews Burwell, a political hack, carte blanche to create and enforce whatever requirements she or Obama want to on insurance companies and private employers (including small businesses). The only exception would be for houses of worship, and the existing, limited accommodation for religiously-affiliated nonprofit organizations would remain.

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which passed the Senate 97-3 and the House unanimously, would be rendered irrelevant beyond individuals. I do not know how this would impact a privately owned business with a single owner. And who knows what would happen with state level religious freedom laws.

18 posted on 07/16/2014 1:59:31 PM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
awesome avalanche

Avalanche of Awesome!

19 posted on 07/16/2014 2:18:33 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Now there is a big surprise with those 3. NOT!


20 posted on 07/16/2014 2:32:10 PM PDT by Jean2 (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Well of course. Any civilized culture kills its young. Every educated, scientifically-minded human being knows and subscribes to that...

Extremists, however, have the audacity to suggest that mothers and babies are not natural enemies.

21 posted on 07/16/2014 3:06:45 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
“It’s an essential part of women’s health and should be part of an employee’s package, and not something she has to go and add on later,” Sen. Maria Cantwell, Washington Democrat, said.

Why do people in Washington State (and yes, it's "people", not just Cantwell) believe that executing children in their mothers' wombs is an essential part of "women's health"? I live in the state; what is about this state that makes people so... murderous?

I realize this is not - directly at least - an abortion-related measure, but it's along the same road with much the same rhetoric. Futhermore, a select few of these drugs are abortifacients and do, in fact, result in the death of a tiny human being, hence the Hobby Lobby case.

22 posted on 07/16/2014 3:10:36 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom

I moved here from CA (was in the military here, met a girl, and married her).

Speaking about Western Washington, from Olympia to the border: Never met meaner people anywhere. Never met more entitled and arrogant people. Silicon alley is worse, but not much worse. Between the feminists, the single parent families, the noveau-riche software and coffee plutocrats, the abortionists who are doing it all ‘for the kids’ - they are reprehensible people.

Openly anti-Semitic - they have speakers at church who talk about the brutality of the Israeli people toward Palestinians and they don’t invite anyone to counter it.

Eastern Washington? It’s the obverse of Western Washington. Good people, patriotic, and out to help each other. They will help you when you are down, but they can’t tolerate idiots.

Spokane is weird. They don’t know whether to be fish nor fowl. Gonzaga is in the heart of it, which makes for great basketball, but the social justice indoctrination will make you upchuck your Keds.


23 posted on 07/16/2014 3:19:49 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom

I hear you and also live here.

My only thought is that we have a large liberal population, state politics is basically run by them from King County, Seattle and Olympia.

Even though Murray and Cantwell are leftists I find it hard to believe they want abortion pills given to pro abortion baby killers along with already supplied birth control.


24 posted on 07/16/2014 3:24:55 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It’s almost like they WANT more dead babies, as though it’s a goal of theirs to kill as many human embryos as possible. It’s not good enough for them that the non-abortifacient drugs are just fine.


25 posted on 07/16/2014 3:51:59 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

this is the big payback to planned parenthood. if you have to have plans that cover abortion, who does abortions? most hospitals don’t. most abortionists don’t work/have privileges at hospitals.


26 posted on 07/16/2014 7:07:22 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson