Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems’ Plan B disintegrates: Bill to reverse Hobby Lobby ruling can’t clear filibuster
The Washington Times ^ | July 16, 2014 | Tom Howell Jr.

Posted on 07/16/2014 12:57:54 PM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
The Rats political stunt didn't last long.

Collins, Kirk, Murkowski vote with Rats. Sigh

1 posted on 07/16/2014 12:57:54 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

No fan of the RINOs but I suspect they voted yes to force the democrat’s hand at which point Hairy Roid voted NO.


2 posted on 07/16/2014 1:03:14 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Wasn’t Harry Reid able to invoke the “nuclear option”, to blow up the filibuster once and for all, making everything a simple majority?


3 posted on 07/16/2014 1:05:21 PM PDT by alloysteel (Most people become who they promised they would never be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Health rights? Abortion is very unhealthy for the baby.


4 posted on 07/16/2014 1:05:55 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

>>>Collins, Kirk, Murkowski vote with Rats. Sigh <<<

Actually, Collinrat, Kirkrat and Murkowskirat voted with the other rats.

Nothing to be surprised at or sigh . . . these are all democrats wearing republican robes, or more correctly - wolves in sheep’s clothing.


5 posted on 07/16/2014 1:06:12 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Health rights? Abortion is very unhealthy for the baby.

AMEN to that.

6 posted on 07/16/2014 1:08:14 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

He only did so for nominations, not for routine business.


7 posted on 07/16/2014 1:08:16 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Well, they didn't say it was a good plan!

That's why it was Plan B!

8 posted on 07/16/2014 1:10:13 PM PDT by uglybiker (nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-BATMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress

Bump.


9 posted on 07/16/2014 1:10:20 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It worked perfectly. It will come up again in September after normal schedules return as an election time issue to stoke anger among the Sarah Flucke types and drive the angriest horn dogs to the polls.


10 posted on 07/16/2014 1:13:44 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

11 posted on 07/16/2014 1:14:45 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Since they are discussing “Women’s Health”, how about this suggestion for preventative medicine. When you lay down cross your legs.


12 posted on 07/16/2014 1:18:57 PM PDT by billhilly (Its OK, the left hated Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Harry . . . here is a simple solution, just invoke another nuclear option and make yourself and your party the sole decision making body in America . . . please, please do - and then come November, when WE are the majority we can impeach the whole lot of you including your halfrican boss. We won’t even drag it out!


13 posted on 07/16/2014 1:20:57 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

Yep, doesn’t cost a cent and it’s 100% effective.


14 posted on 07/16/2014 1:21:21 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Well, not 100% effective. There was that one woman 2014 years ago.
But there are exceptions to every rule.


15 posted on 07/16/2014 1:39:40 PM PDT by christx30 (Freedom above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: christx30

So true, and then in modern times there’s that dastardly toilet seat. :-)


16 posted on 07/16/2014 1:42:36 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

All the RATS have anymore are stunts. Well lies and stunts.


17 posted on 07/16/2014 1:44:58 PM PDT by uncitizen (Buckle up! We're on the Facism Fast Track!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
This law would give the HHS Secretary, Sylvia Mathews Burwell, a political hack, carte blanche to create and enforce whatever requirements she or Obama want to on insurance companies and private employers (including small businesses). The only exception would be for houses of worship, and the existing, limited accommodation for religiously-affiliated nonprofit organizations would remain.

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which passed the Senate 97-3 and the House unanimously, would be rendered irrelevant beyond individuals. I do not know how this would impact a privately owned business with a single owner. And who knows what would happen with state level religious freedom laws.

18 posted on 07/16/2014 1:59:31 PM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
awesome avalanche

Avalanche of Awesome!

19 posted on 07/16/2014 2:18:33 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Now there is a big surprise with those 3. NOT!


20 posted on 07/16/2014 2:32:10 PM PDT by Jean2 (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson