Violence fuels debate among Muslims over interpreting faith

My Way ^ | January 12, 2015 | Lee Keath

[Biggirl]

CAIRO (AP) — After gunmen in Paris killed 12 people, Saudi Arabia's top body of Muslim clerics quickly condemned the attack and said it could have no acceptable justification. It was a signal from some of the Islamic world's strictest voices that cartoons lampooning the Prophet Muhammad in the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo were not a reason to kill the artists.

[pepsionice]

There are over fifty different Catholic, Jewish, Christian and Islamic prophets. Wouldn’t the rule from Islamists be that all fifty deserve such treatment? Oh, but you never hear that argument. I should note.....a proper Islamist....would note Jesus as a prophet.

[knarf]

If muslims are beginning to argue and debate amongst themselves for validity, we can only expect more deaths until they get themselves under control

If the violence DOES immediately stop, we should be prepared for a war with robots ... or zombies ... or whatever you want to call a faction of humanity (?) that operates by a verbal command with no thought (?) to consider the individual may be correct and the cadre is wrong.

What do you do with the D.I.'s that drill and have drilled for 20 years, young men to kill on command ? .. (f'rinstance)

Do they suddenly stop and say "Whew ... thank God THAT'S all over .... Hey Fred ... wann'a get a beer ?"

I don't think so

No .... the fact that it is being published that the islamic (submissive) world is questioning itself is more dangerous than if it just kept going the way it was.

History is rapidly advancing and we have no time to analyze AS it happens ...

I think we should stop and continue to respond like it HAS been happening.

islam must die .... period ... especially now, if they are indeed 'talking'

[yldstrk]

Good find

[Westbrook]

The fat Saudis and the other mohammedan bigwigs might be getting worried about the West spawning some terrorists of its own.

I submit that Western terrorists striking back are likely to be more terrible, and inflict more damage, to more high value targets, than even the muzloid terrorists.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks Biggirl.

Saudi Arabia's top body of Muslim clerics quickly condemned the attack and said it could have no acceptable justification.

[Biggirl]

You are welcome!

[PoloSec]

This so-called debate would be classified as an anomaly, don’t expect to hear of it again.

[djf]

Muslims “debate”.

We die.

[I want the USA back]

Isn’t that nice. I’ll believe it only if the world is free from jihadi violence for 100 years or more.

[arthurus]

If the mohammedan clerics feel that the popular feeling against them is getting dangerous then they say all the right things to calm the infidels down while the saracens oil their AKs and adjust their vests.

[Buckeye McFrog]

Part of their problem appears to be that nearly any jamoke can declare himself an Imam and begin issuing fatwahs.

[Petrosius]

"But the question is, why is it Muslims who get so angry and kill and blow things up? The French magazine insulted the pope, the Dalai Lama. ... Why do we express our anger in this way?"

BINGO!

Islam is based on violence and its history shows their willingness to use it. Islam has a 1400 year history. Over this time the use of violence has been constant. It is those who would have a peaceful Islam that are the anomaly, not the jihadists.

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

Here is the justification, just in case the Saudi clerics have not read the Koran:

KORAN [33.57] Surely (as for) those who speak evil things of Allah and His Apostle, Allah has cursed them in this world and the here after, and He has prepared for them a chastisement bringing disgrace.
KORAN [33.58] And those who speak evil things of the believing men and the believing women without their having earned (it), they are guilty indeed of a false accusation and a manifest sin.
KORAN [33.59] O Prophet! say to your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers that they let down upon them their over-garments; this will be more proper, that they may be known, and thus they will not be given trouble; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
KORAN [33.60] If the hypocrites and those in whose hearts is a disease and the agitators in the city do not desist, We shall most certainly set you over them, then they shall not be your neighbors in it but for a little while;
KORAN [33.61] Cursed: wherever they are found they shall be seized and murdered, a (horrible) murdering.
KORAN [33.62] (Such has been) the course of Allah with respect to those who have gone before; and you shall not find any change in the course of Allah.

http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/k/koran/koran-idx?type=DIV0&byte=650389

ISLAM DELENDA EST

[Netz]

The real debate is how to go about killing Infidels. Some Muslims think it should be slow while others believe it must be speeded up. That is the debate in Islam. The very concept of FREEDOM of ____________ you fill in the blank does not exist in their communities so all this Western talk of Freedom of Expression means nothing to these slugs.

[Louis Foxwell]

Correct. This is about tactics, not policy. The goal is world domination. The many headed dog uses every means available to achieve a world wide caliphate. Ask the imams if they are opposed to global islam.

[Netz]

If they had a brain instead of a massive turd in their cranium, the Imam's would publicly denounce the violence but, alas, they can't because they're for it all.

[North Coast Conservative]

Taqiyya, Taqiyya, Taqiyya

Nothing may needs to be said.

[bgill]

If muslims are beginning to argue and debate amongst themselves for validity, we can only expect more deaths until they get themselves under control

Yes, it's just starting. Just wait until it explodes.

[Fantasywriter]

‘After gunmen in Paris killed 12 people, Saudi Arabia’s top body of Muslim clerics quickly condemned the attack and said it could have no acceptable justification.’

Of course the massive anti-Islam German rallies that preceded the slaughter and the massive ‘unity’ [also anti-Muslim, for most participants] had nothing to do with the condemnation.

Actually they had everything to do with it. As long as the West was blamed for any and all Islamic terror, and as long as prominent pols spouted the joint stupidities of, ‘We need to understand the roots of Muslim rage,’ and ‘Islam is a religion of peace,’ there were no quick, unilateral condemnations. It was only after hatred of Islam’s bloody, psychopathic, sadistic, murdering ways started to turn the brand to mud that condemnations of this level and seriousness began.

If we had world leaders with any insight whatsoever, this would be a clue. Unfortunately PC kills clues, along with hordes of innocent people.