Posted on 02/04/2017 8:07:57 AM PST by grimalkin
Democrats are confident that muslim terrorists will just somehow know they have good feelings for muslims so muslim killers will gladly accommodate their liberal life styles:
Their passion for homosexuality, transgenders, women walking around commando and bra-less with their udders hanging half out, etc. will all be overlooked.
Because, after all, isn't it the mean old Bitter Clingers on the right who really deserve to be stoned and beheaded?
Follow the money paid to any so called religious group if they become the funnel/mechanism to bring in large numbers of unvetted Middle East people into America.
Trump will be releasing this data. A lot of Americans not for putting a lid on the influx of unvetted middle Eastern people will be changing their minds.
My question is where is that relocation bribe money coming from?
Is that money coming from our tax $’s or George $oreA$$ or a combo of both with matching funds from the Opecker Princes.
The Opecker Princes don’t want these people in their lands. Those people might create another Egypt.
It appears 43% of people polled did not understand the question. ..are stupid...or are enemies
Unfortunately perception is quickly becoming reality. The “Muslim Ban” narrative is taking root. They think they finally have something to hurt Trumps support and his support is all he has. Not the MSM. Not the Rats, Not the GOPe just his voters and they think this is it and they are going all out.
ping
"It appears 43% of people polled did not understand the question. ..are stupid Democrat voters, aka enemies of a strong America!"
Not according to Rasmussen?
Ok, I’m decent at math. So he has 136 percent support? Not even including Democrats??
Winning!
Better!
That 18%claiming to be republican probably ought to go be a democrat now. Obviously members of the Bush group
Oh you mean the news outlets that polled Hillary as winning by as much as twenty percent?
Sorry just because translated means nothing. Some of those folks set up our service men. Some of those folks turned guns on our service folks
Tens of thousands? I doubt it very much
This is the present STUPID MILITARY, as I had four Montagnard interpreters in my rifle company. They were paid 150-200 percent more then my riflemen with my chief interpreter, Y Blim Nie, making over $400 a month in 1968. My privates made more then Viet LT’s and no, we did not promise anyone US citizenship. Only Y Blim Nie ever made it to the USA after making it to Thailand. He was the only man out of 120 or so in that company to survive that war. What is our Army/military coming to? I damn sure think it was much better in 1966-1969 then 69-75. By 1973 the druggies and black power types were around.
Not all women....and go back at the sixties radicals. More were women they got guys to do their dirty work
until the next attack..and make no mistake, there will be one.
But the argument was made these Iraqis should be considered military veterans.” Really?
Okay that got me fired up as a vet with documented vet ancestors back to the revoluntary war.
We have some younger relatives, who do interviewing of possible employees with companies large enough to have a HR dept. They have told all of us too disturbing new issues from their HR people. They live and work in different states and for different companies. Those serious issues were probably driven by Obama thugs in their final months forced on medium to large companies across America.
1, They can’t ask Veterans what type of discharge they got.
2. Applicants don’t have to say if they have been arrested.
One of our adult off springs got into his HR flunky with both #1 and #2.
#1. He challenged the HR flunky with this remark, “Why are you discriminating against people like my Dad, grandparents, uncles and cousins who served honorably and received an honorable discharge? Shouldn’t a less than honorable discharge be a serious red flag not to hire that person?
He was told that he couldn’t ask about discharges under the new company policy.
#2. He asked if the company hired a criminal, and that person did criminal acts after being hired, while on the job, could the company and he be responsible. The HR flunkie told him that was not his job to determine if someone was a criminal based on their criminal record.
One of the HR hires, sent to him failed to show up to work for a day, and his excuse was, “he had to see his parole officer.”
He refused to tell our relative, who his parole officer was and his phone number for verification
The company did a random drug test (still allowed), and the guy never showed up for work after the test. He had several drugs on board, legal and illegal and was close to the alcohol limit re driving.
So the HR hire was terminated. After he was fired, he still was claiming that he was working and used our relative’s name as an employment credit reference. All types of credit problems on this guy came out. Our relative referred all of these call to the HR flunky.
The above is an example of what happens, when the Rat pcism flows over into the business world.
We need to support Trump as he gets rid of these horrible and crippling policies re who can be hired and why .
82% of Republicans means 18% against, also known as the domain of mccain and those of his democrat ilk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
