Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen: 82 Percent of Republicans, 54 Percent of Independents Back Trump’s Refugee Moratorium
Breitbart ^ | 2/4/17 | Katie McHugh

Posted on 02/04/2017 8:07:57 AM PST by grimalkin

Republican voters overwhelmingly approve of President Donald Trump temporarily halting the importation of refugees, even after a media firestorm falsely labeled it a “Muslim ban.”

Rasmussen Reports filtered out media hysteria and asked likely voters: “The federal government has banned refugees from all countries from entering the United States for the next four months until there is a better system in place to keep out individuals who are terrorist threats. Do you favor or oppose such a ban?” A majority, 52 percent, favored the move, while 43 percent opposed it, and six percent were unsure.

Men strongly approved of the temporary ban, with 61 percent supporting it and 34 percent opposing it. Only 43 percent of women support it, while 51 percent oppose it.

Younger voters are far more in favor of the moratorium than older ones: Of those aged 18 to 39, 57 percent favored the ban. Meanwhile, 49 percent of voters aged 40 and older approved of the ban.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2017polls; bordersecurity; first100days; hias; immigration; moratorium; polls; rabbis; trump45; trump7countryban; visa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: grimalkin
The communists will use the courts to defeat President Trump. Just enough judges are communists and know that they can order Trump in any way they feel and unless Trump immediately orders the House to impeach this ars, we are finished. Jobs won't mean a damn thing. America has been destroyed by the communists Democrats and will never reverse. Wake the F up! How do you like the paid riots, canceling immigration rule, sanctuary cities, etc etc.
21 posted on 02/04/2017 8:26:50 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/israel_the_middle_east/most_still_favor_refugee_freeze


22 posted on 02/04/2017 8:31:08 AM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
Democrats think terrorists won't kill them because, after all, democrats welcome them with open arms.

Democrats are confident that muslim terrorists will just somehow know they have good feelings for muslims so muslim killers will gladly accommodate their liberal life styles:

Their passion for homosexuality, transgenders, women walking around commando and bra-less with their udders hanging half out, etc. will all be overlooked.

Because, after all, isn't it the mean old Bitter Clingers on the right who really deserve to be stoned and beheaded?


23 posted on 02/04/2017 8:31:35 AM PST by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 66 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csvset

Follow the money paid to any so called religious group if they become the funnel/mechanism to bring in large numbers of unvetted Middle East people into America.

Trump will be releasing this data. A lot of Americans not for putting a lid on the influx of unvetted middle Eastern people will be changing their minds.

My question is where is that relocation bribe money coming from?

Is that money coming from our tax $’s or George $oreA$$ or a combo of both with matching funds from the Opecker Princes.

The Opecker Princes don’t want these people in their lands. Those people might create another Egypt.


24 posted on 02/04/2017 8:33:19 AM PST by Grampa Dave (This is about news that never happened. So it doesn't even qualify as fake news! Thanks Chaguito!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

It appears 43% of people polled did not understand the question. ..are stupid...or are enemies


25 posted on 02/04/2017 8:40:33 AM PST by goodnesswins (Say hello to President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
Here is something to think about. If Iran should struck and kill Americans we would normally go to war. Trump will declare war, as temporally as the Constitution allows it, and the Congress will vote. But the communists Democrats will use a sick judge, thousands of them, to nullify the order. So as America turns it laws over to the communists, more Americans will be killed. All hail the powerful communists that are running America.
26 posted on 02/04/2017 8:45:25 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Unfortunately perception is quickly becoming reality. The “Muslim Ban” narrative is taking root. They think they finally have something to hurt Trumps support and his support is all he has. Not the MSM. Not the Rats, Not the GOPe just his voters and they think this is it and they are going all out.


27 posted on 02/04/2017 8:48:09 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

ping


28 posted on 02/04/2017 8:54:36 AM PST by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
I did a little editing and addition to your excellent summary.

"It appears 43% of people polled did not understand the question. ..are stupid Democrat voters, aka enemies of a strong America!"

29 posted on 02/04/2017 9:08:31 AM PST by Grampa Dave (This is about news that never happened. So it doesn't even qualify as fake news! Thanks Chaguito!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Not according to Rasmussen?


30 posted on 02/04/2017 9:11:52 AM PST by Grampa Dave (This is about news that never happened. So it doesn't even qualify as fake news! Thanks Chaguito!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

Ok, I’m decent at math. So he has 136 percent support? Not even including Democrats??

Winning!


31 posted on 02/04/2017 9:28:28 AM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Better!


32 posted on 02/04/2017 9:52:48 AM PST by goodnesswins (Say hello to President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

That 18%claiming to be republican probably ought to go be a democrat now. Obviously members of the Bush group


33 posted on 02/04/2017 9:56:04 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martinidon

Oh you mean the news outlets that polled Hillary as winning by as much as twenty percent?


34 posted on 02/04/2017 9:57:15 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Sorry just because translated means nothing. Some of those folks set up our service men. Some of those folks turned guns on our service folks

Tens of thousands? I doubt it very much


35 posted on 02/04/2017 9:59:10 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

This is the present STUPID MILITARY, as I had four Montagnard interpreters in my rifle company. They were paid 150-200 percent more then my riflemen with my chief interpreter, Y Blim Nie, making over $400 a month in 1968. My privates made more then Viet LT’s and no, we did not promise anyone US citizenship. Only Y Blim Nie ever made it to the USA after making it to Thailand. He was the only man out of 120 or so in that company to survive that war. What is our Army/military coming to? I damn sure think it was much better in 1966-1969 then 69-75. By 1973 the druggies and black power types were around.


36 posted on 02/04/2017 9:59:25 AM PST by Lumper20 (Muslims, Latinos, Asians etc. Assimilate means learn English plus OUR WAYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Not all women....and go back at the sixties radicals. More were women they got guys to do their dirty work


37 posted on 02/04/2017 10:00:32 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

until the next attack..and make no mistake, there will be one.


38 posted on 02/04/2017 10:02:01 AM PST by basalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

But the argument was made these Iraqis should be considered military veterans.” Really?

Okay that got me fired up as a vet with documented vet ancestors back to the revoluntary war.

We have some younger relatives, who do interviewing of possible employees with companies large enough to have a HR dept. They have told all of us too disturbing new issues from their HR people. They live and work in different states and for different companies. Those serious issues were probably driven by Obama thugs in their final months forced on medium to large companies across America.

1, They can’t ask Veterans what type of discharge they got.

2. Applicants don’t have to say if they have been arrested.

One of our adult off springs got into his HR flunky with both #1 and #2.

#1. He challenged the HR flunky with this remark, “Why are you discriminating against people like my Dad, grandparents, uncles and cousins who served honorably and received an honorable discharge? Shouldn’t a less than honorable discharge be a serious red flag not to hire that person?

He was told that he couldn’t ask about discharges under the new company policy.

#2. He asked if the company hired a criminal, and that person did criminal acts after being hired, while on the job, could the company and he be responsible. The HR flunkie told him that was not his job to determine if someone was a criminal based on their criminal record.

One of the HR hires, sent to him failed to show up to work for a day, and his excuse was, “he had to see his parole officer.”

He refused to tell our relative, who his parole officer was and his phone number for verification

The company did a random drug test (still allowed), and the guy never showed up for work after the test. He had several drugs on board, legal and illegal and was close to the alcohol limit re driving.

So the HR hire was terminated. After he was fired, he still was claiming that he was working and used our relative’s name as an employment credit reference. All types of credit problems on this guy came out. Our relative referred all of these call to the HR flunky.

The above is an example of what happens, when the Rat pcism flows over into the business world.

We need to support Trump as he gets rid of these horrible and crippling policies re who can be hired and why .


39 posted on 02/04/2017 10:02:10 AM PST by Grampa Dave (This is about news that never happened. So it doesn't even qualify as fake news! Thanks Chaguito!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

82% of Republicans means 18% against, also known as the domain of mccain and those of his democrat ilk.


40 posted on 02/04/2017 10:33:28 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson