Posted on 07/01/2017 3:44:44 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
More states are pushing back against President Donald Trump's Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.
As of Friday, 25 states have refused to give partial or full requested information, according to the Washington Post. Some states cited state laws prohibiting them from releasing certain voter information, while others opposed the information request due to the commission itself, the Post reported.
Trump tweeted about the subject Saturday morning writing, "Numerous states are refusing to give information to the very distinguished VOTER FRAUD PANEL. What are they trying to hide?"
Trump's commission on voter fraud asked each state to provide personal data on all registered voters going back to 2006.
(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...
These facts are all public knowledge,so there is no reason for states to refuse to share it unless there is massive voter fraud in those states. Cut off all federal funds pertaining to elections to states that refuse to cooperate.
Aren’t LEGAL voters sick and tired of being disenfranchised by illegals, college students, snowbirds, the dead, and just outright tampering and fraud?
Placemark.
That is a lot of vote fraud in 25 states.
Fake news.
The request specified that states were being asked to provide info as allowed by state law.
States not providing complete info because of this are not ‘pushing back’. How many are refusing because they are ‘opposed to the commission’ and how many of those 25 are actually cooperating to the fullest extent allowed by their laws?
So far, I only see 4 states which are actually refusing to comply. This is like push-polling, trying to get states to refuse because ‘everybody else is doing it’.
Love,
O2
*******TTTTTAAAAAGGGGGLLLLLIIIINNNNEEEE**********
The states that are refusing include:
As of noon on Saturday, the states who have refused the Commission’s demands are:
Arizona, California, Connecticut, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts,
Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, North Carolina,
North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota,
Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin.
“provide personal data on all registered voters” —
The actual request was for “PUBLIC” personal data. The states are pretending they are being asked to divulge private information, but they are not.
And yes, it is pretty clear that democratic states are not cooperating because they are afraid they will get caught.
We all know what they want to hide.
that is 29 states...
(??)
In California, as with all the other states, voter registration is for sale to any party. Here is a list of fields in the voter registration file.
Given that info (which includes, name, date of birth, and address), it would be really simple to cross-check that info with commercial credit-info databases to see if a given person is registered to vote in multiple places, and whether he has.
It would also be easy to cross-check if a registered person has paid taxes, or is a legal citizen -- things the Dems would NOT want to happen.
Knowing Trump, he has almost certainly already gotten all this info via proxies, using his own money, a long time ago, and already has had research done showing where the most fraud has occurred. This is most likely a trap for state officials, where they can be charged with obstruction of justice.
Soros paid off a bunch of SOS’s to make sure this would never happen... HRC was supposed to be POTUS... this just wasn’t supposed to happen... our secret of trashing Voter/Election integrity must remain buried one way or the other....
That’s what in the article I copied from. Some I think aren’t refusing
in total but objecting to parts and some say state law is involved.
New amendment via Aricle V Convention: all voters must report to polls with valid state or federal ID, including photograph & thumbprint, in order to vote in national elections. When states have their own elections, or local, who cares?
KY Gov. Beving needs to find some way to circumvent SoS Alison Lundergan Grimes’ refusal to cooperate with Trump’s Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. The SoS is a democrat and an admirer of Obama and a Hillary supporter.
Oops! Make that Bevin not Beving.
How many have Democrat party Secretaries of State?
http://www.nass.org/index.php/about-nass/alt-roster-2016/
Here’s a handy-dandy guide from the National Association of Secretaries of State!!
Kansas? So Kobach is refusing to comply with his own request?
This family is P.O’ed
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.