Posted on 12/08/2017 2:22:15 PM PST by Hadean
Roy Moore accuser Beverly Young Nelson, with lawyer Gloria Allred in tow, conducted a press conference today pushing back against the idea that Moore’s yearbook signature was “forged,” despite admitting that she did add the date and location afterwards.
The yearbook note in question reads “To a sweeter more beautiful girl I could not say Merry Christmas. Christmas 1977. Love, Roy Moore, D.A. 12-22-77 Olde Hickory House.”
Allred told the press conference that her client had always meant to only include the signature and the Christmas greeting as being written by Moore, saying that she had the signature analyzed and it matched that of Moore.
“She never said that he wrote that,” Allred told the press, referring to the date and location that appear at the end of the quote.
Allred continued to speak highly of Nelson throughout the presser.
“She’s just so brave. I can’t tell you, this kind of courage is something that should inspire so many people, especially women,” she said.
The lawyer also added that Nelson could actually be in physical danger.
“I think she’s in danger and she knows it,” she said. “There are people who feel very comfortable saying things like ‘she should be stoned in the town square’ and sending a photo of a casket. Who does that?”/
[snip]
Allred also noted that the duo would welcome the yearbook to be analyzed by the Senate.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
“...this kind of courage is something that should inspire so many people, especially women,” she said”
You are a sad, sick woman Gloria.
bump
Allred is practicing 'law' in states she does not have a license in.
Yes, and Gloria just alleged that the full signature was signed by Roy Moore when it clearly is part of the forgery part. And while I am on it, if the document is altered, it is all a forgery, although very good forensic analysis may be able to place which part was done before the other part.
I want to see the ethics committee send the document to be analyzed and the full scope of what she did be exposed. And at the same time get Gloria on record as to what she was told and when the added part was made. I believe she wants us to believe the added part was done when she “worked” at the restaurant but it very likely was done at the time her divorce papers were sent to her, because that is when she would have seen Roy’s full business signature. Which she tried to copy and Gloria says was signed by Moore.
This should be enough to charge Gloria with suborning
perjury.
My guess is that something will occur after the election (like a wild fire in Gloria’s office or the like so that the evidence never is allowed to be analyzed.
Moore’s lawyer should immediately go to court and go on record as requiring careful maintenance of the yearbook as evidence.
Yes, and Gloria just alleged that the full signature was signed by Roy Moore when it clearly is part of the forgery part. And while I am on it, if the document is altered, it is all a forgery, although very good forensic analysis may be able to place which part was done before the other part.
I want to see the ethics committee send the document to be analyzed and the full scope of what she did be exposed. And at the same time get Gloria on record as to what she was told and when the added part was made. I believe she wants us to believe the added part was done when she “worked” at the restaurant but it very likely was done at the time her divorce papers were sent to her, because that is when she would have seen Roy’s full business signature. Which she tried to copy and Gloria says was signed by Moore.
This should be enough to charge Gloria with suborning
perjury.
My guess is that something will occur after the election (like a wild fire in Gloria’s office or the like so that the evidence never is allowed to be analyzed.
Moore’s lawyer should immediately go to court and go on record as requiring careful maintenance of the yearbook as evidence.
Fusion GPS.
; )
Notes ? Notes? Those are not notes, they are an attempt at forgery. Look at the location and placement of the “notes” in the yearbook. Hint, they are not at the bottom of the page.
OK, fine, then explain the D.A. at the end of the signature. Whoops!
The issue isn't whether the signature matches that of Moore. The issue is whether or not Moore actually wrote it.
The "D.A." at the end of his signature -- and the information that has come out about how his assistant would sign his name on legal documents and then put her initials "D.A." after it to indicate that she had signed on his behalf -- strongly suggest that Nelson, Allred, or someone else actually copied Moore's signature onto the yearbook page from somewhere else.
She’s in danger all right. But not from conservatives. If she spills the beans on Gloria she’s a dead woman walking and she knows it.
Hope it was worth it, bev, you dirty lying scumbag.
Really? You'll pardon me if I need more than just your say so.
FOX is reporting that she “embellished” the yearbook entry when, in fact, she forged his last name. I’m disgusted with this news outlet.
“She never said that he wrote that,”
She most certainly DID. She presented the yearbook entry, in whole, as the work of Moore, and what she added was an attempt to deceive everyone into believing it was.
“I only lied about part of that note. And if you don’t believe every word I say, you’re a sexist Neanderthal.
“Allred ‘said’ she had it analyzed? Really - who did the analysis?
Fusion GPS.
; )”
Crowd Strike did the analysis of the DNC computer hack and, according to unnamed FBI official(s), “they’re pretty good”
Gloria allred is a professional liar. This vile and loathsome piece of human garbage needs to stop breathing our precious air.
Pre-emptive defense for their forgeries.
Yeah the words "Conspiracy to Defraud" come to mind when I read "part of the signature was forged"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.