threw OUT Koch’s Postulates and the ReqUIREMENT
of isolating any infectious agent, and changed
the diagnosis to ...... SYMPTOMS.
and then to as many PCR cycles as necessary.
and then to ANYTHING.
Fraud, it has been, using the patented
FauXi/CDC ATrocity Gain-of-FUnction Virus.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And Fauci has pledged further funding to Wuhan.
The Moderna 'vaccine' trials used a minimum of 1 'symptom,' which may or may not overlap with symptoms from other diseases, and a (fake) positive PCR test to evaluate the health of participants and the response to the 'vaccine'.
The vaccine trials have to be invalid as they used an invalid method of determining whether illness was or was not present.
PFizer used the PCR too, but hid the name of the 'test' completely in its trial results reports.
Apparently Pfizer was aware the PCR could become a 'problem' for validity so they referred to it by another name, NAAT Nucleic Acid Amplification Test.
The vaccines' development was based on the genome sequence given to us by China. Yes, the country that is utilizing the virus against the United States was trusted to give us the correct genome for the virus in order to 'help us' fight it.
So we are to believe that China engineered Covid-19, released it why lying about it, and then gave us the genomic sequence so we could figure out they engineered it? So they would just give us their bio weapon as proof they are conducting biowarfare?
The 'new' mRNA "vaccines" discarded the traditional methods (isolate the virus) of building vaccines and took China's word, and were given a gene sequence (code), instead of taking the time to isolate the virus themselves.
I do not find it comforting that Dr. Fauci's wing of the NIH helped select the spike protein sequence the "vaccines" are designed to produce. EndNote2 These people (Includes CDC) are serving China's interests and have been for years.
Some experts say it's impossible to create a vaccine based only on a genome sequence. Since China wouldn't give us the true genomic sequence anyway, I'd say those experts are right.
Here's where it gets a little odder. WHen genuine researchers ask for an isolated sample of the virus, they are told by CDC that no such samples are available 'at this time.' Gosh, if only researchers could have had isolated samples from the start, we could have accurate research, other non-toxic vaccine development, and drug trials etc.
This telling 'unavailability' is hotly debated by people who shriek that isolated samples are everywhere, researchers have it, the CDC sent a notice saying samples are available etc! (such claims always have an exclamation point).EndNote1
And yet, researchers continue(d) to be told 'unavailable.'
So I believe China never gave its targets isolated samples of the virus they weaponized, nor the accurate genome sequence of that virus.
Researchers who have electron microscopy images and other 'hard research' were either given the equivalent of a 'press packet' of images, models by China, are actually trusted by China (!) not to share information or reveal content which indicates it was engineered by China, or they have taken the time to isolate their own samples.
Some of our researchers or western researchers have figured out a sort of 'family tree' of viral strains that led to Covid-19 as China tweaked the recipe for "Gain of Function" courtesy of funding from Anthony Fauci.
The virus does exist, it's just not what China says it is, not where the PCR says it is, and not what the drug manufacturers 'product' is designed to defeat.
As a result of this "isolated samples are not available"/"Yes they are!" struggle, some researchers have apparently decided to double down by stating flatly that the virus does not exist. They seem to want the 'other side' to put up or shut up. "Give me a sample or admit it doesn't exist."
To cover exposed backsides (an insufficient metaphor when one is talking about crimes against humanity), I've seen research in pub med (NIH Database of accepted research) completed around fall of 2020 giving the whole 'new' idea of basing vaccination development on genome sequences, instead of the actual virus, a pathetic thumbs up. They are preparing to refute objections to their inexcusable acctions.
REFERENCES BELOW:
1. https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3944996/posts
"Has the existence of “the Virus” been established according to a universally acknowledged set of scientific procedures that must be observed to establish the existence of any and all other viruses?
From the sounds of it, the answer is a resounding no.
Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and Sally Fallon Morell, are among those who have noted in a paper published last year that in demonstrating the existence of a new virus, samples must, firstly, be taken from the blood, phlegm, or other secretions of hundreds of people exhibiting symptoms that are “unique and specific enough to characterize an illness.”
Then, “without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters, and ultracentrifuges, i.e. purifies the specimen.” This, the authors explain, is a “common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages [viruses that infect bacteria and reproduce within them] and so-called giant viruses [a virus larger than typical bacteria].”
Thirdly, once virologists perform this procedure, they are then able to “demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles.” The latter are “the isolated and purified virus.”
Fourthly, upon determining the purity of these particles, virologists are able to examine their “structure, morphology, and chemical composition [.]”
Fifthly, “the genetic makeup” of the particles [the virus] “is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from” them and “using genetic-sequencing techniques” that have long been in existence.
mRNA-1273 is an mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 encoding for a prefusion stabilized form of the Spike (S) protein, which was selected by Moderna in collaboration with investigators from Vaccine Research Center (VRC) at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a part of the NIH. The first clinical batch, which was funded by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, was completed on February 7, 2020 and underwent analytical testing; it was shipped to NIH on February 24, 42 days from sequence selection. The first participant in the NIAID-led Phase 1 study of mRNA-1273 was dosed on March 16, 63 days from sequence selection to Phase 1 study dosing.
On May 6, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) completed its review of the Company’s Investigational New Drug (IND) application for mRNA-1273 allowing it to proceed to a Phase 2 study, which is expected to begin shortly. On May 12, the FDA granted mRNA-1273 Fast Track designation. Moderna is finalizing the protocol for a Phase 3 study, expected to begin in July 2020. A summary of the company’s work to date on SARS-CoV-2 can be found here.