Attorney Anthony Raimondo has evidence PCR tests are the bogus tool of fearmongers: Even the creator of the tests thought they weren't able to accurately determine what should be considered a "case"

For over a year, we have been in varying states of lockdown. Depending on which city and state you live in, some of the lockdowns have been relatively mild while most have been outright draconian. And through it all, we have had to deal more than just an oppressive government. The conflict many people have had with each other over issues like face masks, social distancing, and being stuck at home have caused hardship on top of the economic turmoil most Americans have faced.

Fear is the driving factor behind policies (at least initially) and compliance. The primary cause of this fear has been the rise in “cases” of Covid-19. It seems that whenever we appear to be getting ahead of the pandemic, a new surge or strain pops up to drive us back into a state of perpetual terror. But what if we learned that PCR tests used to determine who is considered a “case” aren’t accurate indicators of who is or is not infected with Covid-19? What if we learned the tests weren’t really even tests at all?

That’s the message attorney Anthony Raimondo is trying to get out to the public. He’s not a doctor or a scientist, so some may question his credentials to declare that results from the PCR Assay do not properly indicate infections. To this, he turns to the inventor of the PCR Assay, Kary Mullis, who felt there were different uses for his machine.

“Well, one of the things that I’ve learned is how shocking it is that this PCR test is really not even a test,” he said. “Its inventor was a guy name Kary Mullis who was a Nobel Prize winning scientist, and he himself actually tangled quite a bit with our good friend Dr. Fauci. He called Fauci a fraud. And he was persistent that his invention, the PCR Assay, is not a test. It is not a diagnostic tool and was never intended to be used as a diagnostic tool.”

This seems to run contrary to the accepted narrative that the PCR Assay can diagnose Covid-19 cases. I went through various fact-check sites to see their verdict and invariably they said this claim about Mullis wasn’t true. But here’s the thing. In ZERO “fact-checks” was I able to find a direct answer to the question. They would say that Mullis was being misrepresented, but would not show the quotes that were allegedly being twisted. The last time I saw fact-checks that were so obscure while declaring definitively that something was true or untrue was during the Russia investigation. Just as with these PCR test “fact-checks,” the same sites were claiming that there was evidence of collusion during the 2016 election without actually noting what that evidence was.

As usual, the fact-checkers were only effective at offering confirmation bias for those who want to be told the mainstream narrative was correct.

Digging deeper, I learned that what Raimondo was reporting was correct. These “tests” use technology that is very easy to manipulate. They “spin” and identify genetic material within a sample. Standard operating procedure says they should go through 10-15 cycles, but the labs handling the Covid-19 tests typically run their samples through 40+ cycles.

Last year, some mainstream media outlets reported on this fallacy. You won’t hear them talking about it anymore. Now, there’s a narrative of fear to push. According to MSN last August:

Up to 90 percent of people tested for COVID-19 in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada in July carried barely any traces of the virus and it could be because today’s tests are ‘too sensitive’, experts say.

Health experts say PCR testing – the most widely used diagnostic test for COVID-19 in the US – are too sensitive and need to be adjusted to rule out people who have insignificant amounts of the virus in their systems because they’re likely not contagious.

Today the PCR test, which provides a yes or no answer if a patient is infected, doesn’t say how much of the virus a patient has in their body.

PCR tests analyze genetic matter from the virus in cycles and today’s tests typically take 37 or 40 cycles, but experts say this is too high because it detects very small amounts of the virus that don’t pose a risk.

The question that must be asked is, why? If scientists and doctors believe the “tests” lose accuracy while inflating “cases,” why do the testing centers continue to engage in this frustrating practice? Many conspiracy theorists will point to the government. Others will say it’s Big Pharma and the politicians they own. Some will say it’s the globalists who are pushing for The Great Reset. But one does not have to be a conspiracy theorist to look at the facts and realize this all stinks.

Raimondo isn’t just out there talking about this on shows. He’s putting his money—and his business—where his mouth is. He works with businesses across California who have been fined for opening. His first word of advice: Don’t pay the fines. He encourages everyone to invoke their rights as American citizens to receive due process. He has helped many beat their fines and get their businesses open.

“I haven’t seen successful battles fought in the United States but we’re seeing cracks in the foundation elsewhere in the world,” he said. “In November of 2020, an appeals court in Portugal threw out all of their government policies that were based on the PCR tests for the reasons that I described. They found that the PCR test was completely unreliable as a diagnostic tool. A positive PCR test doesn’t mean that a person is sick. It doesn’t mean that a person is contagious.”

On the latest episode of NOQ Report, Raimondo gave us tons of data to digest. In fact, there was so much useful information that we plan on having him back on the show very soon. The Two Mikes gave us another news update as well.

PCR “tests” are finding Covid when testing fruits. They are extremely sensitive and should not be used as the basis for determining cases. Authorities know this. Why, then, do they continue to inflate the numbers? The answer is troubling.

.... and THAT is why the CRIMINALS in the CDC and FauXi
threw OUT Koch’s Postulates and the ReqUIREMENT
of isolating any infectious agent, and changed
the diagnosis to ...... SYMPTOMS.

and then to as many PCR cycles as necessary.

and then to ANYTHING.

Fraud, it has been, using the patented
FauXi/CDC ATrocity Gain-of-FUnction Virus.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And Fauci has pledged further funding to Wuhan.

The Moderna 'vaccine' trials used a minimum of 1 'symptom,' which may or may not overlap with symptoms from other diseases, and a (fake) positive PCR test to evaluate the health of participants and the response to the 'vaccine'.

The vaccine trials have to be invalid as they used an invalid method of determining whether illness was or was not present.

PFizer used the PCR too, but hid the name of the 'test' completely in its trial results reports.

Apparently Pfizer was aware the PCR could become a 'problem' for validity so they referred to it by another name, NAAT Nucleic Acid Amplification Test.

The vaccines' development was based on the genome sequence given to us by China. Yes, the country that is utilizing the virus against the United States was trusted to give us the correct genome for the virus in order to 'help us' fight it.

So we are to believe that China engineered Covid-19, released it why lying about it, and then gave us the genomic sequence so we could figure out they engineered it? So they would just give us their bio weapon as proof they are conducting biowarfare?

The 'new' mRNA "vaccines" discarded the traditional methods (isolate the virus) of building vaccines and took China's word, and were given a gene sequence (code), instead of taking the time to isolate the virus themselves.

I do not find it comforting that Dr. Fauci's wing of the NIH helped select the spike protein sequence the "vaccines" are designed to produce. EndNote2 These people (Includes CDC) are serving China's interests and have been for years.

Some experts say it's impossible to create a vaccine based only on a genome sequence. Since China wouldn't give us the true genomic sequence anyway, I'd say those experts are right.

Here's where it gets a little odder. WHen genuine researchers ask for an isolated sample of the virus, they are told by CDC that no such samples are available 'at this time.' Gosh, if only researchers could have had isolated samples from the start, we could have accurate research, other non-toxic vaccine development, and drug trials etc.

This telling 'unavailability' is hotly debated by people who shriek that isolated samples are everywhere, researchers have it, the CDC sent a notice saying samples are available etc! (such claims always have an exclamation point).EndNote1

And yet, researchers continue(d) to be told 'unavailable.'

So I believe China never gave its targets isolated samples of the virus they weaponized, nor the accurate genome sequence of that virus.

Researchers who have electron microscopy images and other 'hard research' were either given the equivalent of a 'press packet' of images, models by China, are actually trusted by China (!) not to share information or reveal content which indicates it was engineered by China, or they have taken the time to isolate their own samples.

Some of our researchers or western researchers have figured out a sort of 'family tree' of viral strains that led to Covid-19 as China tweaked the recipe for "Gain of Function" courtesy of funding from Anthony Fauci.

The virus does exist, it's just not what China says it is, not where the PCR says it is, and not what the drug manufacturers 'product' is designed to defeat.

As a result of this "isolated samples are not available"/"Yes they are!" struggle, some researchers have apparently decided to double down by stating flatly that the virus does not exist. They seem to want the 'other side' to put up or shut up. "Give me a sample or admit it doesn't exist."

To cover exposed backsides (an insufficient metaphor when one is talking about crimes against humanity), I've seen research in pub med (NIH Database of accepted research) completed around fall of 2020 giving the whole 'new' idea of basing vaccination development on genome sequences, instead of the actual virus, a pathetic thumbs up. They are preparing to refute objections to their inexcusable acctions.

REFERENCES BELOW:

1. https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3944996/posts

"Has the existence of “the Virus” been established according to a universally acknowledged set of scientific procedures that must be observed to establish the existence of any and all other viruses?

From the sounds of it, the answer is a resounding no.
Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and Sally Fallon Morell, are among those who have noted in a paper published last year that in demonstrating the existence of a new virus, samples must, firstly, be taken from the blood, phlegm, or other secretions of hundreds of people exhibiting symptoms that are “unique and specific enough to characterize an illness.”

Then, “without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters, and ultracentrifuges, i.e. purifies the specimen.” This, the authors explain, is a “common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages [viruses that infect bacteria and reproduce within them] and so-called giant viruses [a virus larger than typical bacteria].”

Thirdly, once virologists perform this procedure, they are then able to “demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles.” The latter are “the isolated and purified virus.”

Fourthly, upon determining the purity of these particles, virologists are able to examine their “structure, morphology, and chemical composition [.]”

Fifthly, “the genetic makeup” of the particles [the virus] “is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from” them and “using genetic-sequencing techniques” that have long been in existence.

2. About mRNA-1273

mRNA-1273 is an mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 encoding for a prefusion stabilized form of the Spike (S) protein, which was selected by Moderna in collaboration with investigators from Vaccine Research Center (VRC) at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a part of the NIH. The first clinical batch, which was funded by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, was completed on February 7, 2020 and underwent analytical testing; it was shipped to NIH on February 24, 42 days from sequence selection. The first participant in the NIAID-led Phase 1 study of mRNA-1273 was dosed on March 16, 63 days from sequence selection to Phase 1 study dosing.

On May 6, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) completed its review of the Company’s Investigational New Drug (IND) application for mRNA-1273 allowing it to proceed to a Phase 2 study, which is expected to begin shortly. On May 12, the FDA granted mRNA-1273 Fast Track designation. Moderna is finalizing the protocol for a Phase 3 study, expected to begin in July 2020. A summary of the company’s work to date on SARS-CoV-2 can be found here.

Pasted from <https://investors.modernatx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/moderna-announces-positive-interim-phase-1-data-its-mrna-vaccine>

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.