Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge blasts Trump’s ‘entirely inappropriate’ E. Jean Carroll rape case post
NY Post ^ | 04/26/2023 | Priscilla DeGregory

Posted on 04/26/2023 11:32:44 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

A Manhattan federal judge blasted Donald Trump’s “entirely inappropriate” posts on Truth Social Wednesday — as witness testimony began in E. Jean Carroll’s civil rape case against the former president.

Trump, 76, took to his social media platform about an hour before the second day of the trial began, claiming Carroll’s case was “a made up SCAM” and accusing her lawyers of being “political operatives.”

He also called for the dress the former advice columnist wore on the day of the alleged rape to be brought into the trial — something that Carroll sought to do early on in the case to compare the garment against Trump’s DNA.

Judge Lewis Kaplan — who previously ruled that nothing about Trump’s DNA would come into the trial — grilled the ex-president’s lawyer about the post before the jury was brought in, warning that the message appeared to be meant for the panel.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: blasts; carroll; clintonjudge; clintonstooge; ejeancarroll; ejweirdo; fakecharges; firstamendment; frchristianrapecult; globalistpropaganda; jhavenfarm; joodge; judge; judgelacksintegrity; lewiskaplan; loonytoonsnyccourts; meninblack; rapehappyfreepers; rapelovingfrcult; rapinbilljudge; sdnewyork; serialrapistdonald; spewiskaplan; stoogejudge; tds; trump; trump2024; trumpallowedtospeak; trumpalsocameondress
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: j.havenfarm

Defendants ae told by their lawyers to remain silent so they don’t inadvertently incriminate themselves. Since Trump isn’t lying he has nothing to hide.


21 posted on 04/26/2023 11:52:08 AM PDT by jimwatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

This is just the Trump haters putting up someone to distract DJT. While that is happening DeSantis will move into the lead, but not for long. DeSantis is a Trojan Horse for anti-Trump Rinos to move Paul Ryan up in the pecking order. Murdoch knew that Tucker would expose all this on his programs so he had him fired. At least that’s what Rupert’s gardener says.


22 posted on 04/26/2023 11:55:07 AM PDT by EliRoom8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimwatx

A defendant can make a statement that is counter to his/her interest, even if innocent. A defendant can present themselves unfavorably to jurors, even if innocent. I think this accusation is a crock, but a New York juror might agree that the case is a crock, but fear the consequences of voting for Trump. Ask Derek Chauvin. He never had a chance. Any juror voting to acquit would have had his house burned down within a week.


23 posted on 04/26/2023 11:58:32 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jimwatx

Ok. You’ve obviously mastered the issue, so I’ll set aside my experience, including in a CIVIL case that had an eight figure judgment, and defer to your superior grasp of the matter. Seriously, I’ll leave the field to you and the other legal beagles who chimed in, and whom I’ll invite to wipe the foam off their lips that formed while they were making their posts.


24 posted on 04/26/2023 12:00:09 PM PDT by j.havenfarm (22 years on Free Republic, 12/10/22! more then 6500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm
Folks here love his lack of discernment and self-control.

You like the judges lack of discernment and self-control when it comes to the First Amendment?

25 posted on 04/26/2023 12:01:26 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Trump is correct. Always attack these pieces of chit.


26 posted on 04/26/2023 12:02:45 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA ("How did you go bankrupt?" Bill asked. "Two ways," Mike said. "Gradually and then suddenly." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

what you said !!!


27 posted on 04/26/2023 12:04:44 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

The judge is right. This is trying to influence the jury pool. Geesh! Trump completely lacks self control.


28 posted on 04/26/2023 12:06:04 PM PDT by EliRoom8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jimwatx

And I bet that you just run your mouth whenever police officer, detective, prosecutor, starts, asking a lot of questions. You have nothing to hide right?


29 posted on 04/26/2023 12:08:58 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Go Woke, Go Broke. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm; Fairhairedboy
Thank you for your ignorant and condescending comment there, Mr Simpleton. 22 years on FR, and 32 years before the bar. The latter has taught me that defendants, whether in civil or criminal cases, should keepin their f’in mouths shut in public while their trials are in progress. Nothing to be gained, and lots to be lost. I’m sure this case is an exception to this rule /s/

For starters, it's none of the judges business what the defendant says outside of court.

About your point of being what is good for the defendant, in this case, the defendant is running for office, is subject to daily comments in the court of public opinion from the slanted media, and has every right to give his side of the story.

30 posted on 04/26/2023 12:14:06 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jimwatx

No, DeSantis as an experienced attorney, knows when it is appropriate to keeps ones mouth shut.


31 posted on 04/26/2023 12:15:22 PM PDT by HonorInPa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

I like how you lawyers like to inflate your legal prowess by bragging about the amounts involved in the cases you’ve won. That say nothing about your legal or trial skill, it could have been a no lose case that you just happened to luck into. The fact that you keep strutting around as a lawyer on this thread suggests to me you’re more likely just an ambulance chaser with Trump derangement syndrome.


32 posted on 04/26/2023 12:16:23 PM PDT by jimwatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

Never met a lawyer that wasn’t an idiot, a crook or both.


33 posted on 04/26/2023 12:16:39 PM PDT by MagaMatt (Sapere aude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

Oh please! The justice system is completely corrupt and you bitch about Trump.


34 posted on 04/26/2023 12:16:54 PM PDT by Chgogal (Welcome to Fuhrer Biden's Weaponized Fascist Banana Republic! It's the road to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm
...I’ll set aside my experience...

Nobody is debating your ad nauseum experience not your unwanted legalese, the issues are Trump hatred and the cabal's attempt to destroy the man that is going to destroy the cabal, hopefully. And obviously without your help.

35 posted on 04/26/2023 12:17:33 PM PDT by Fairhairedboy (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

She is a loony tune PLAIN AND SIMPLE, bringing this to trial is an abomination!!! ONLY because it is Trump!!!


36 posted on 04/26/2023 12:18:34 PM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: central_va
How does a citizen disrespect a judicial system that has no repect for equal justice under the law. It is not possible.

💯

37 posted on 04/26/2023 12:20:28 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MagaMatt

“Never met a lawyer that wasn’t an idiot, a crook or both.”

Not to mention a loser. I mean no lawyer wins all their arguments. If lawyers, a liberal arts degree BTW, we so damned smart and right there wouldn’t be any need for courts or lawyers. We’d just get in a room with these geniuses and they would agree on the outcome.


38 posted on 04/26/2023 12:20:44 PM PDT by CodeToad (No Arm up! They have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

Folks here love his lack of discernment and self-control.

****************

Since you’re an attorney, maybe you can help with finding information on this case.

Where can somebody find the two lawsuits Carroll is bringing?

Not what the media is saying, but the actual paper work that alleges battery & defamation(this lawsuit) & defamation. (another lawsuit filed by Carroll.)


39 posted on 04/26/2023 12:22:52 PM PDT by unclebankster ( Globalism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

>> “entirely inappropriate” posts

Changing the statute of limitations to persecute Trump was totally inappropriate.


40 posted on 04/26/2023 12:23:09 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson