Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First US nuclear power plant built this century goes online
The Register ^ | 1 August 2023 | Brandon Vigliarolo

Posted on 08/02/2023 10:59:06 AM PDT by ShadowAce

It's more than half a decade late coming online and has cost billions more than estimated, but Georgia Power's Vogtle Unit 3, the first US nuclear reactor built from scratch this century, has finally come online. 

Located near Waynesboro, Georgia, the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant's third reactor will supply an estimated 500,000 homes and businesses in the region with power. Utility companies in Georgia, Florida and Alabama all receive electricity generated by Vogtle's existing reactors, the first two of which came online in the late 1980s, and a fourth power facility is due to come online within the next year. 

"Today's achievement … marks the first day of the next 60 to 80 years that Vogtle Unit 3 will serve our customers with clean, reliable energy." said Georgia Power CEO, chairman and president Kim Greene. Georgia Power said its overall energy mixture is now approximately 25 percent nuclear.  

Construction on Vogtle 3, and its sister reactor Vogtle 4, began in 2009, making it the first nuclear reactor built from the ground up this century, but not the first new reactor in the last 23 years. 

That honor belongs to Tennessee-based Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, which brought its second reactor online in 2016. Watts Bar Unit 2 began construction in 1972, but was paused in 1985. Construction wasn't resumed until 2007, and took another nine years to finish. 

With Vogtle 3 online, Georgia Power is now turning to the completion of Vogtle 4, which it believes will be ready late in the fourth quarter of 2023 or early 2024. Once Unit 4 is online, Vogtle's total output will make it the "largest generator of clean energy" in the US, Georgia Power said.

The nuclear power plant that nearly never was

Vogtle Units 3 and 4 are the first pair of Westinghouse AP1000 reactors to come online outside of four units currently being used in China and four additional reactors slated for construction in the Middle Kingdom. 

Given how poorly early attempts to deploy AP1000s in the US went, it's a small wonder Vogtle 3, and eventually 4, are being completed at all. 

Westinghouse Electric Company touts the AP1000 as the "world's first proven Generation III+ pressurized water reactor," but it was also designed with a novel construction concept: using more prefabricated parts that could be constructed in a central location and then assembled on-site. 

While, in theory, this should ensure a standardized reactor design deployable in various locations, Westinghouse's projects at Vogtle and the Virgil C. Summer nuclear power plant in South Carolina ended up contributing to the company's bankruptcy in 2017, the year Vogtle 3 and 4 were originally expected to come online. 

Reuters' investigation of the mess found setbacks from the very beginning, like the use of backfill in Vogtle 3 and 4's foundation pits that failed to meet regulatory approval, causing a six-month delay. Missing paperwork also stalled construction at Vogtle for an additional eight months, it was reported. 

Westinghouse also miscalculated the time it would take to build the modular reactors, Reuters found, eventually costing the company $13 billion in cost overruns. Work on AP1000 reactors at the Summer nuclear power plant was canceled following Westinghouse Electric Co's bankruptcy filing in 2017, something the company is just now emerging after being a buy-out from an investment house and a supplier of uranium.

Rather than throwing in the towel in Georgia, Virginia-based Bechtel was eventually chosen to complete the Vogtle project in Westinghouse's stead.

Many believe that nuclear energy is the most reliable way currently available to decarbonize the world's power generation. The International Energy Agency assessed last year that the world's 2050 carbon emissions goals need nuclear in order to succeed, and that worldwide nuclear output needs to double in the next 27 years to limit global warming to 1.5°C targets.

It's unclear whether those goals can be achieved with officials in countries like the UK, which has set a target of 24 gigawatts of nuclear energy capacity by 2050. The government recently admitted that the planned expansion of nuclear power is more of a wish list than an actual actionable policy. 

Meanwhile, earlier this year, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission finalized a rule allowing small modular reactors manufactured by NuScale to begin commercial production. NuScale's design is the first SMRs to get approval for construction and deployment in the US, and could be used to do things like provide reliable power to remote locations, or supply green energy for datacenters.

According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, there are only four SMRs currently in advanced stages of construction, located in Argentina, China and Russia. ®


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: nuclear

1 posted on 08/02/2023 10:59:06 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

We need 200-300 reactors in the US.


2 posted on 08/02/2023 11:03:00 AM PDT by Reno89519 (DeSantis 2024. Successful Governor, Honorable Veteran, Respectful, Respected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

If the global-warming crowd and the electrify-everything crowd were serious people, we’d be well under way to having 200-300 NEW reactors in the US,

They aren’t, so we don’t.


3 posted on 08/02/2023 11:06:26 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

The world is completely unstable. WW3 on the horizon. The USA is almost bankrupt. These thing require constant cooling even when shut down. What could go wrong?


4 posted on 08/02/2023 11:10:21 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

5 posted on 08/02/2023 11:10:25 AM PDT by GaltAdonis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

As the ignorant sociopath politicians and environmentalists continue to destroy the reliable sources of electricity with so-called renewable energy I can see factories, industrial complexes and entire cities disconnecting from the grid and deploying their own private SMR power plants.


6 posted on 08/02/2023 11:13:31 AM PDT by KamperKen (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Most people think that it was the Three Mile Island incident that did in nuclear power in the USA. It was probably really due to the movie “The China Syndrome” that was released just 12 days earlier.

I was just watching a video where all of the waste reactor fuel ever created could fit in canisters 25 feet tall and covering a football field.

The amount of energy for the mass is unbelievable. And they only get something like 5% of the energy out before they change the rods.

2 minute video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUvvIzH2W6g


7 posted on 08/02/2023 11:13:49 AM PDT by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Just great more nuclear waste but by God we don’t have any oil to worry about.


8 posted on 08/02/2023 11:15:24 AM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
all of the waste reactor fuel ever created could fit in canisters 25 feet tall and covering a football field.

The real crime here is that it's not waste, in any meaningful sense. It can be and should be reprocessed into fuel. The "Fast Breeder Reactor" fuel cycle does this. Jimmy Carter stopped that in the USA by executive order, and no president since, including Reagan and Trump, has had the guts to rescind Carter's idiocy.

9 posted on 08/02/2023 11:16:23 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Construction on Vogtle 3, and its sister reactor Vogtle 4, began in 2009

American efficiency.

10 posted on 08/02/2023 11:16:41 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Leftist Democrat anti-human deliberate INefficiency.


11 posted on 08/02/2023 11:18:08 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519
We need 200-300 reactors in the US.

And we'll have them, in the year 2525

12 posted on 08/02/2023 11:18:14 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Ah, no, they don’t. If they’re completely shut down they don’t need constant cooling applied.

The AP1000s will actually shut down safely if they lose cooling water input - they can cool down to safe shutdown if the circuit is full at the time of failure:

https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1523/ML15230A043.pdf


13 posted on 08/02/2023 11:24:32 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Union labor.


14 posted on 08/02/2023 11:56:49 AM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Yeah. In the video the guy talks about those designs, but not the stupid law that prevents it.


15 posted on 08/02/2023 12:14:37 PM PDT by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleopatra_2525


16 posted on 08/02/2023 12:41:07 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Reminds me of Zager & Evans 'In the Year 2525': https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKQfxi8V5FA
17 posted on 08/02/2023 12:55:28 PM PDT by Reno89519 (DeSantis 2024. Successful Governor, Honorable Veteran, Respectful, Respected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

How big of a coincidence was it that the movie “China Syndrome” came out in March of 1979 and the Three Mile Island occurred 2 weeks later and then 71 new nuclear power plant orders were cancelled between 1979 and 2001.

I guess the oil and gas companies and enviro-wackos just got real lucky.


18 posted on 08/02/2023 1:05:59 PM PDT by nitzy (I wonder if the telescreens in 1984 were first called "free Obamascreens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nitzy

Ironically Three Mile Island would have never occurred if the operators hadn’t interrupted the shut down. The plant was in the process of shutting down but the operators didn’t believe what they were seeing so they stopped it causing the issue.


19 posted on 08/02/2023 4:43:10 PM PDT by Mean Daddy (Every time Hillary lies, a demon gets its wings. - Windflier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Can you imagine how many politicians and leeches got rich off the bribes needed to get this going?


20 posted on 08/02/2023 4:44:31 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson