Posted on 09/13/2023 10:51:22 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Fulton County’s District Attorney Fani Willis (D) on Wednesday insisted former President Trump and all of his co-defendants in the 2020 election interference case be tried together in October, despite already-emerging skepticism from the judge.
“The State requests this Court to keep all defendants together for trial … until the Defendants have presented to this Court their basis for severance,” Willis said in court documents made public Wednesday.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
It’s going to be a circus and it also looks like it will barely get out of the starting gate before it falls apart completely for the prosecution.
So they are indicting lawyers now? For working for their clients?
Nice... I hope all you lawyers out there are taking note.
Sounds like it’s going to be a disaster for her and the democrat’s hand picked judge/judges
She knows this is in trouble and way over her head, which is why she is using tax dollars to hire outside counsel to help her get out of this mess.
One thing about Soros he picks the dumbest ones he can find ,LOL
She knows she can cobble together a jury of Trump haters to get a conviction. She also knows the chance of getting 19 juries together who have never heard of the defendant and getting some BS conviction is quite low.
Imagine 8 guilty verdicts and 11 not guilty verdicts going into appeals. We think this looks like a circus, just wait.
EC
How is she going to keep 19 unrelated cases taped together through even pre-trial motions? Trump is going to move for federal court, and most of these defendants have a case for dismissal.
Is there a judge stupid enough to try 19 political defendants at once?
So whose rights is she planning on disregarding. The two who want a speedy trial or the 16 who need time to prepare?
Only republican lawyers. Democrat lawyers can do anything, break any law and the Bar association only winks and smiles.
Oh Yea, there are lots of Obama judges out there that are that stupid.
Can’t have a soviet show trial unless you’re going to really put on a show. Maybe bring in some kangaroos in tutus and a marching bad to play “L’Internationale” .
19 defendants
HOW many lawyers???
How many court stenographers???
How many bailiffs???
HOW MANY MEDIA????
HOW BIG IS THAT COURTROOM
““Realistically, holding three or more simultaneous high-profile trials would create a host of security issues and would create unavoidable burdens on witnesses and victims, who would be forced to testify three or more times on the same set of facts in the same case,” prosecutors wrote.”
Nah. That’s not it.
It’s a package deal and the prosecution HAS to try them together or the whole case falls apart. Imagine trying to prosecute someone for simply making a speech or a phone call. The case is weak as it is and they must have them tried together to even begin to make their bogus case.
ALSO-—19 JURIES & ALTERNATES????
There are 19 jury deliberation rooms in that courthouse???
At this rate-—tickets will have to passed out for bathroom trips.
FIFY.
Nothing says “Show Trial” like a mass trial with a verdict before hand.
I posted this question five days ago:
How does one single jury constitute as "peers" to 19 different individuals?Somebody should challenge this on Constitutional grounds, demanding separate juries for each person because the charges are different, their actions were different, their jobs were different, their motives were different, etc.
One jury cannot reasonably be "peers" to 19 separate individuals.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.