BLACK RACISM: THE HATE CRIME THAT DARE NOT SPEAK ITS NAME

Front Page Magazine ^ | July 16, 2002 | David Horowitz

[SJackson]

Background The Wichita Massacre

[biblewonk]

I saw another post of some news piece that was mocking the hate crimes bill as hurting blacks more than helping them. It turned out that they were getting busted for hate crimes 2 or 3 to 1 more than whites.

[Joe Brower]

The Wichita Massacre.

[TomGuy]

The story referenced below got buried by the media and apparently didn't get much circulation outside the Seattle area. I heard it mentioned on a couple of talk shows yesterday, and that was the first I became aware of it. This story shows what happens when the police become so fearful of potential lawsuits that they can't do their jobs. The result can be an atrocity.

King County deputy dies after shooting in Newcastle (naked suspect).

[mondonico]

The "background" article also reminds us that it is sometimes very dangerous to remain passive in the face of brutal aggression.

[Zon]

Do you know a source that has a categorical list of events reported in the media each year?

[bok]

It's been this way for atleast 20 years hasn't it? Subvert the rights of whites and exalt and promote the rights of blacks. During the civil rights movement in the south Jewish people from colleges and othet sectors marched, i suppose it was to show they had more moral authority. What about the bolsheviks? What group or people are above morality and who is PERFECT?

[fporretto]

Of course, all of this is of a piece with the underlying premise of the racial-grievances industry: that only whites are capable of racism in the first place.

Please see also:

Pieties

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

the hate crimes bill as hurting blacks more than helping them. It turned out that they were getting busted for hate crimes 2 or 3 to 1 more than whites.

Reaction to the KKK legitimated Black cultural acceptance of crime, especially including "hate" crime. The KKK is no longer accepted in white America, but black reaction to its action in the past has not been delegitimated. It is, rather, nourished--by black and white con artists. Including, tragicly, the media.

Take away the media hype legitimating reaction to essentially phantom threats, and the problem would be greatly ameliorated within a generation. But what then would journalism have to talk about?

[american colleen]

bump for later reading.

[Behind Liberal Lines]

Check out this article about a store owner being targeted for protests because his store was the site of an alleged white on black hate crime, even though the store owner is the one who called the police in the first place.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/715595/posts

[Mudboy Slim]

"The U.S. Justice Department has reported that 85% of all inter-racial violence in America is committed by blacks against whites. But there are apparently no black hate crimes; and there is certainly no white civil rights movement to create sympathy for the victims."

BTTT...MUD

[cubreporter]

Why cant Fox News Ch bring this out? Also Rush and some of the other radio stations? I don't expect anything from the rest of the TV chs but...let Fox News bring it to light and go with it from there.

[RAT Patrol]

Because they are black, the Wichita killers have been protected from national scrutiny and have not even been charged with a hate crime.

Yeah, well stand in line. If the Kansas issue is DE-EMPHASIZING evolution, the national media cartel comes out in force (and distorts the facts by saying we are REMOVING evolution teaching from the schools), but if the issue is Christians being driven out of the California schools, or discriminated against in Michigan, GLSEN teaching "fisting" in Massachusetts, Boy Scouts being discriminated against in Florida, or apparently black hate crimes in Wichita --- shh..the national media attack dog is sleeping...

[goodieD]

Excellent post!

[heckler]

BUMP

This story and others like it need more national attention.

As some one who lived very near to the location of this crime I can tell you that it really made some blood boil around here.

[KS Flyover]

BUMP!

[staytrue]

The U.S. Justice Department has reported that 85% of all inter-racial violence in America is committed by blacks against whites

Here is the deal. If a black commits a crime by pulling a name out of a hat, he will pick a white person 7 out of 10 times. If a white commits a crime by pulling a name out of a hat, he will pick a black person 1 out of 6 times. Bottom line is if blacks commit about 50% of all crimes in the US (which is actually correct) then by random chance, blacks will commit about 82% of all interracial crimes.

Blacks commit more crimes per capita than others, but it is not targeted against whites.

To further illustrate the point, lets look at the last of the mohicans which would be one guy. If the last of the mohicans commits a crime, it will be 100% chance of being interracial. If a white commits a crime, there is only a 1 in 300 million chance that it will be against a mohican.

To repeat, the problem is that blacks commit more crime but it is not targeted against whites.

[heckler]

Are you being sarcastic?

[staytrue]

Suppose you put 1 black guy and 8 white guys in a room. This is the approximate proportion of the population as a whole. If the black guy commits a random crime, there is a 100% chance of it being against a white guy. When a white guy commits a crime, there will be a 1-8 chance that it will be against the black guy. This does not mean that the black is targeting whites.