Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schools Could Be Sued For Teaching About Homosexuality, Report Claims
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 9/06/02 | Robert B. Bluey

Posted on 09/06/2002 4:38:31 AM PDT by kattracks

CNSNews.com) - Two California parental-rights groups say schools that address homosexuality in their curriculum or in after-school programs face an increasing risk of being sued by parents.

The Pro-Family Law Center (PFLC) and the United States Justice Foundation released a report Wednesday that will be distributed to parents, school districts and the state education department. The 15-page document cites court decisions, which the groups claim could be used in lawsuits to challenge schools that seek to "normalize homosexuality."

"We're in the early stages of a national campaign to homosexualize American schools," PFLC attorney Scott Lively said. "Ten years ago this was not happening. We have a generation of school kids who are the official guinea pigs in a social experiment that we believe is going to have dramatically harmful effects."

Lively, who called the report "groundbreaking," said it gives parents an avenue to challenge schools. Once parents have the document in their hands, he wants them to distribute it to teachers and administrators.

The report highlights what it claims are liabilities associated with incorporating homosexuality into a student's education. It encourages schools to abandon any discussion of homosexuality.

Lively said lawsuits could arise from any number of factors, but overlooking parental concern is chief among the risks that schools take.

"Parental rights are some of the most fundamental of all rights recognized under the Constitution," he said. "Using the general principles of law and looking at the facts as we see them unfold, it's very easy to predict what's happening here. We are going to see some of these things being decided over the next few years."

But requiring parental permission for all discussions about sexuality, as the report suggests, carries parents' rights too far, especially when it involves after-school programs, said Wayne Besen, spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign, a homosexual advocacy organization.

"Parents don't have the right to stop young men and women from receiving the help they need," Besen said. "The parents themselves are often the threat. These [homosexual student] groups are there to help vulnerable people who are subject to humiliation and harassment get the services they need."

The Human Rights Campaign was mentioned in the report as an organization that promotes such practices in schools along with the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) and Parents, Families & Friends of Lesbians & Gays (PFLAG).

Officials at GLSEN declined to comment on the report and calls to PFLAG were not returned.

Besen said the report is the latest attempt by anti-homosexual groups to advance their political agenda. Besides, he said schools are not doing nearly enough to protect students from classmates who harass them.

"[Schools] should have a zero-tolerance policy," he said. "Any student who gets caught harassing a gay or lesbian student should be punished appropriately. [Schools] need to teach people they are entitled to their beliefs, but they should be tolerant to all minorities, including gay and lesbian students."

Lively countered Besen's arguments by claiming homosexuals exaggerate concerns about school safety to advance their own political cause.

"There is no problem with school safety," Lively said. "Schools have the authority to stop harassment by students, but you don't solve that problem by dividing them up into groups."

He suggested the best way to address the liability problems would be for schools to stop addressing homosexuality in the classroom and in after-school activities and instead to concentrate on the more traditional subjects of reading, writing and arithmetic.

E-mail a news tip to Robert B. Bluey.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.

 



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; sasu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: princess leah
Public School

Why Johnny Can't Think.

Shalom.

61 posted on 09/06/2002 10:41:36 AM PDT by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
I'm beginning to understand why Pat Buchannan (whom I have never supported) used the tag line he did when running for president.

Lock and Load!

Shalom.

62 posted on 09/06/2002 10:42:49 AM PDT by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
"Parents don't have the right to stop young men and women from receiving the help they need," Besen said. "The parents themselves are often the threat. These {homosexual student] groups are there to help vulnerable people who are subject to humiliation and harassment get the services they need."

There it is folks. Parents don't have the right. The state will decide what child needs what "help", and what services they need.

The educational establishment thinks that parents are often the threat. This is going to get worse before it gets better.

63 posted on 09/06/2002 11:17:16 AM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Nephi
Do you think it interesting that the Pope used the words, "deviant affections" to describe pedophiles, but never used the word for sodomite?

He didn't need to. The concept is included in the broader term that he did use. What are you implying?

64 posted on 09/06/2002 12:16:58 PM PDT by Steve0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
So the Gaystapo's war on America hits a bump in the road. Good news, indeed.
65 posted on 09/06/2002 12:51:59 PM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve0113
The question is what is the Pope implying by using the words, "obvious deviations in their affections?" Afterall, he isn't Alan Greespan, he can come right out and say what he means. Frankly, the word "obvious" is the one that is most troubling, perhaps discrete is okay?
66 posted on 09/06/2002 1:49:23 PM PDT by Nephi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Well, Hillary thinks the child, the parents, and the village should decide on the child's wants and needs. It used to be the parents decided. God help us if Hillary gets any further than she has.
67 posted on 09/06/2002 2:53:48 PM PDT by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
Excuse me? I had to rub my eyes and read that quote a second time. Oh, horrors! We certainly wouldn't want a parents' rights to be taken too far... /heavy sarcasm

LOL, now we've found common ground.

68 posted on 09/06/2002 3:58:29 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

To: FormerLib
So the Gaystapo's war on America hits a bump in the road. Good news, indeed.

Never underestimate the power of whine.

70 posted on 09/06/2002 6:47:24 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
LOL!

Yeah, they got us whupped in that regard. We'll never match them in the hissy fit competition.

71 posted on 09/07/2002 9:34:38 AM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

bttt
72 posted on 09/08/2002 3:57:27 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: john in missouri; ArGee
I don't own a weapon. I'm challenging the wisdom of my decision more and more every day.

May I recommend the 9-millimeter from Kahr Arms, in stainless steel? The 40-caliber is a bit more powerful, but you may sacrifice availability of an extra round due to the slightly larger size of the ammunition.

What no battle rifle? Every civilized person should at least have a .40 handgun (Glock 27 is compact and holds 11 shots), a .308 battle rifle (FN-FAL) and a scoped snipers rifle (Remington 700). Some body armor and night vision are not a bad idea either.

Recommended reading for gun newbies:

Boston's Gun Bible

73 posted on 09/08/2002 7:57:15 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235; john in missouri
As you both may or may not have inferred from my post, I am not interested in buying a gun to protect and defend myself or even my house. There is nothing given to me by G-d that He can not replace in a heartbeat.

However, our civilization is spiralling out of control towards its own destruction. Whether this is the Biblical end time, it appears to be the end time of what we fondly call Western Civilization. Barbarians are at the gates and the center can not hold unless G-d decides on another Great Awakening. He may, but we have squandered 2 so I don't know why He would waste His time on a third.

With all that we know on the brink, I may need to be armed to defend my neighborhood or town. To that end, I'm not looking at a weapon of self-defense, but a weapon of war. What form that may be I have not yet decided as I have not yet decided to pursue this thought beyond rambling on Free Republic. But that may change sooner than I like to think.

Shalom.

74 posted on 09/09/2002 5:56:09 AM PDT by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ladylib
"I'm glad students are waking up to this fact. They aren't as easily led as some people think. A lot of times the liberal indoctrination just doesn't take."

I think parents can exert much influence over their children's thinking if they take the time. Problem is, most don't.

Our fifteen-year old has embraced many of our conservative ideals. We have taken the time to tell him our beliefs as well as why we believe the way we do. We offer information from many sources to support our ideas. This has enabled him to successfully "peg" which of his teachers are liberals and conservatives. We've had many interesting discussions while picking apart and ridiculing stupid remarks ( like "socialism has worked quite well for the Europeans, it makes everything more equal" made by his dumba$$ government teacher) made by various teachers. I've been able to gain loads of insight into my child's thinking and am quite proud of direction he's taken. Of course, if we as parents are "not there" it's easy to see how kids can buy into the crap they are fed by the liberal teachers.
75 posted on 09/09/2002 6:24:38 AM PDT by OldBlondBabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
Teaching kids to think approvingly of homosexual behavior is a form of child abuse.

Any exposure of children to homosexual behavior is child abuse

God Save America (Please)

76 posted on 09/09/2002 7:54:41 AM PDT by John O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: john in missouri
May I recommend the 9-millimeter from Kahr Arms, in stainless steel? The 40-caliber is a bit more powerful, but you may sacrifice availability of an extra round due to the slightly larger size of the ammunition.

I kind of like my Para-Ordnance 7.45 LDA. The 45 caliber ammo means you only need to be reasonably close to the target to make a sizeable "impression." Nice, smooth double action as well. Besides, if you can't settle things in 8 rounds, you are probably in trouble anyway.

77 posted on 09/11/2002 4:26:34 PM PDT by CalConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: OldBlondBabe
We have taken the time to tell him our beliefs as well as why we believe the way we do.

This is why the homosexual advocacy groups want to take parents out of the picture by both keeping them in the dark about the pro-homosexual activities in the schools and by discrediting their ideals where ever they can. Keep up the good work!

As for me, my wife and I have given up on government schools and gone to homeschooling. That doesn't mean we bury our heads in the sand and ignore what happens in the government schools, though. We are just as outspoken as we always are because there are many parents who do not recognize the dangers that lurk there.

78 posted on 09/11/2002 4:33:41 PM PDT by CalConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson