Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Battle of the Alamo - Thirteen Days to Glory
University of Texas ^ | Unknown | Stephen L. Hardin

Posted on 11/24/2002 7:30:41 AM PST by SAMWolf

The siege and the final assault on the Alamo in 1836 constitute the most celebrated military engagement in Texas history. The battle was conspicuous for the large number of illustrious personalities among its combatants. These included Tennessee congressman David Crockett, entrepreneur-adventurer James Bowie, and Mexican president Antonio López de Santa Anna. Although not nationally famous at the time, William Barret Travis achieved lasting distinction as commander at the Alamo. For many Americans and most Texans, the battle has become a symbol of patriotic sacrifice. Traditional popular depictions, including novels, stage plays, and motion pictures, emphasize legendary aspects that often obscure the historical event.

To understand the real battle, one must appreciate its strategic context in the Texas Revolution. In December 1835 a Federalist army of Texan (or Texian, as they were called) immigrants, American volunteers, and their Tejano allies had captured the town from a Centralist force during the siege of Bexar. With that victory, a majority of the Texan volunteers of the "Army of the People" left service and returned to their families. Nevertheless, many officials of the provisional government feared the Centralists would mount a spring offensive. Two main roads led into Texas from the Mexican interior. The first was the Atascosito Road, which stretched from Matamoros on the Rio Grande northward through San Patricio, Goliad, Victoria, and finally into the heart of Austin's colony. The second was the Old San Antonio Road, a camino real that crossed the Rio Grande at Paso de Francia (the San Antonio Crossing) and wound northeastward through San Antonio de Béxar, Bastrop, Nacogdoches, San Augustine, and across the Sabine River into Louisiana. Two forts blocked these approaches into Texas: Presidio La Bahía (Nuestra Señora de Loreto Presidio) at Goliad and the Alamo at San Antonio. Each installation functioned as a frontier picket guard, ready to alert the Texas settlements of an enemy advance. James Clinton Neill received command of the Bexar garrison. Some ninety miles to the southeast, James Walker Fannin, Jr., subsequently took command at Goliad. Most Texan settlers had returned to the comforts of home and hearth. Consequently, newly arrived American volunteers-some of whom counted their time in Texas by the week-constituted a majority of the troops at Goliad and Bexar. Both Neill and Fannin determined to stall the Centralists on the frontier. Still, they labored under no delusions. Without speedy reinforcements, neither the Alamo nor Presidio La Bahía could long withstand a siege.

At Bexar were some twenty-one artillery pieces of various caliber. Because of his artillery experience and his regular army commission, Neill was a logical choice to command. Throughout January he did his best to fortify the mission fort on the outskirts of town. Maj. Green B. Jameson, chief engineer at the Alamo, installed most of the cannons on the walls. Jameson boasted to Gen. Sam Houston that if the Centralists stormed the Alamo, the defenders could "whip 10 to 1 with our artillery." Such predictions proved excessively optimistic. Far from the bulk of Texas settlements, the Bexar garrison suffered from a lack of even basic provender. On January 14 Neill wrote Houston that his people were in a "torpid, defenseless condition." That day he dispatched a grim message to the provisional government: "Unless we are reinforced and victualled, we must become an easy prey to the enemy, in case of an attack."

By January 17, Houston had begun to question the wisdom of maintaining Neill' s garrison at Bexar. On that date he informed Governor Henry Smith that Col. James Bowie and a company of volunteers had left for San Antonio. Many have cited this letter as proof that Houston ordered the Alamo abandoned. Yet, Houston's words reveal the truth of the matter:

"I have ordered the fortifications in the town of Bexar to be demolished, and, if you should think well of it, I will remove all the cannon and other munitions of war to Gonzales and Copano, blow up the Alamo and abandon the place, as it will be impossible to keep up the Station with volunteers, the sooner I can be authorized the better it will be for the country."

Houston may have wanted to raze the Alamo, but he was clearly requesting Smith's consent. Ultimately, Smith did not "think well of it" and refused to authorize Houston' s proposal.

On January 19, Bowie rode into the Alamo compound, and what he saw impressed him. As a result of much hard work, the mission had begun to look like a fort. Neill, who well knew the consequences of leaving the camino real unguarded, convinced Bowie that the Alamo was the only post between the enemy and Anglo settlements. Neill's arguments and his leadership electrified Bowie. "I cannot eulogize the conduct & character of Col. Neill too highly," he wrote Smith; "no other man in the army could have kept men at this post, under the neglect they have experienced." On February 2 Bowie wrote Smith that he and Neill had resolved to "die in these ditches" before they would surrender the post. The letter confirmed Smith's understanding of controlling factors. He had concluded that Bexar must not go undefended. Rejecting Houston's advice, Smith prepared to funnel additional troops and provisions to San Antonio. In brief, Houston had asked for permission to abandon the post. Smith considered his request. The answer was no.

Colonel Neill had complained that "for want of horses," he could not even "send out a small spy company." If the Alamo were to function as an early-warning station, Neill had to have outriders. Now fully committed to bolstering the Bexar garrison, Smith directed Lt. Col. William B. Travis to take his "Legion of Cavalry" and report to Neill. Only thirty horsemen responded to the summons. Travis pleaded with Governor Smith to reconsider: "I am unwilling to risk my reputation (which is ever dear to a soldier) by going off into the enemy' s country with such little means, and with them so badly equipped." Travis threatened to resign his commission, but Smith ignored these histrionics. At length, Travis obeyed orders and dutifully made his way toward Bexar with his thirty troopers. Reinforcements began to trickle into Bexar. On February 3, Travis and his cavalry contingent reached the Alamo. The twenty-six-year-old cavalry officer had traveled to his new duty station under duress. Yet, like Bowie, he soon became committed to Neill and the fort, which he began to describe as the "key to Texas." About February 8, David Crockett arrived with a group of American volunteers.

On February 14 Neill departed on furlough. He learned that illness had struck his family and that they desperately needed him back in Bastrop. While on leave, Neill labored to raise funds for his Bexar garrison. He promised that he would resume command when circumstances permitted, certainly within twenty days, and left Travis in charge as acting post commander. Neill had not intended to slight the older and more experienced Bowie, but Travis, like Neill, held a regular army commission. For all of his notoriety, Bowie was still just a volunteer colonel. The Alamo's volunteers, accustomed to electing their officers, resented having this regular officer foisted upon them. Neill had been in command since January; his maturity, judgment, and proven ability had won the respect of both regulars and volunteers. Travis, however, was unknown. The volunteers insisted on an election, and their acting commander complied with their wishes. The garrison cast its votes along party lines: the regulars voted for Travis, the volunteers for Bowie. In a letter to Smith, Travis claimed that the election and Bowie's subsequent conduct had placed him in an "awkward situation." The night following the balloting, Bowie dismayed Bexar residents with his besotted carousal. He tore through the town, confiscating private property and releasing convicted felons from jail. Appalled by this disorderly exhibition, Travis assured the governor that he refused to assume responsibility "for the drunken irregularities of any man"-not even the redoubtable Jim Bowie. Fortunately, this affront to Travis's sense of propriety did not produce a lasting breach between the two commanders. They struck a compromise: Bowie would command the volunteers, Travis the regulars. Both would co-sign all orders and correspondence until Neill's return. There was no more time for personality differences. They had learned that Santa Anna's Centralist army had reached the Rio Grande. Though Travis did not believe that Santa Anna could reach Bexar until March 15, his arrival on February 23 convinced him otherwise. As Texans gathered in the Alamo, Travis dispatched a hastily scribbled missive to Gonzales: "The enemy in large force is in sight. We want men and provisions. Send them to us. We have 150 men and are determined to defend the garrison to the last." Travis and Bowie understood that the Alamo could not hold without additional forces. Their fate now rested with the General Council in San Felipe, Fannin at Goliad, and other Texan volunteers who might rush to assist the beleaguered Bexar garrison.

Santa Anna sent a courier to demand that the Alamo surrender. Travis replied with a cannonball. There could be no mistaking such a concise response. Centralist artillerymen set about knocking down the walls. Once the heavy pounding reduced the walls, the garrison would have to surrender in the face of overwhelming odds. Bottled up inside the fort, the Texans had only one hope-that reinforcements would break the siege.

On February 24 Travis assumed full command when Bowie fell victim to a mysterious malady variously described as "hasty consumption" or "typhoid pneumonia." As commander, Travis wrote his letter addressed to the "people of Texas & all Americans in the world," in which he recounted that the fort had "sustained a continual Bombardment and cannonade for 24 hours." He pledged that he would "never surrender or retreat" and swore "Victory or Death." The predominant message, however, was an entreaty for help: "I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid, with all dispatch." On March 1, thirty-two troops attached to Lt. George C. Kimbell's Gonzales ranging company made their way through the enemy cordon and into the Alamo. Travis was grateful for any reinforcements, but knew he needed more. On March 3 he reported to the convention at Washington-on-the-Brazos that he had lost faith in Colonel Fannin. "I look to the colonies alone for aid; unless it arrives soon, I shall have to fight the enemy on his own terms." He grew increasingly bitter that his fellow Texans seemed deaf to his appeals. In a letter to a friend, Travis revealed his frustration: "If my countrymen do not rally to my relief, I am determined to perish in the defense of this place, and my bones shall reproach my country for her neglect."

On March 5, day twelve of the siege, Santa Anna announced an assault for the following day. This sudden declaration stunned his officers. The enemy's walls were crumbling. No Texan relief column had appeared. When the provisions ran out, surrender would remain the rebels' only option. There was simply no valid military justification for the costly attack on a stronghold bristling with cannons. But ignoring these reasonable objections, Santa Anna stubbornly insisted on storming the Alamo. Around 5:00 A.M. on Sunday, March 6, he hurled his columns at the battered walls from four directions. Texan gunners stood by their artillery. As about 1,800 assault troops advanced into range, canister ripped through their ranks. Staggered by the concentrated cannon and rifle fire, the Mexican soldiers halted, reformed, and drove forward. Soon they were past the defensive perimeter. Travis, among the first to die, fell on the north bastion. Abandoning the walls, defenders withdrew to the dim rooms of the Long Barracks. There some of the bloodiest hand-to-hand fighting occurred. Bowie, too ravaged by illness to rise from his bed, found no pity. The chapel fell last. By dawn the Centralists had carried the works. The assault had lasted no more than ninety minutes. As many as seven defenders survived the battle, but Santa Anna ordered their summary execution. Many historians count Crockett as a member of that hapless contingent, an assertion that still provokes debate in some circles. By eight o'clock every Alamo fighting man lay dead. Currently, 189 defenders appear on the official list, but ongoing research may increase the final tally to as many as 257.

Though Santa Anna had his victory, the common soldiers paid the price as his officers had anticipated. Accounts vary, but best estimates place the number of Mexicans killed and wounded at about 600. Mexican officers led several noncombatant women, children, and slaves from the smoldering compound. Santa Anna treated enemy women and children with admirable gallantry. He pledged safe passage through his lines and provided each with a blanket and two dollars. The most famous of these survivors were Susanna W. Dickinson, widow of Capt. Almaron Dickinson, and their infant daughter, Angelina Dickinson. After the battle, Mrs. Dickinson traveled to Gonzales. There, she reported the fall of the post to General Houston. The sad intelligence precipitated a wild exodus of Texan settlers called the Runaway Scrape.

What of real military value did the defenders' heroic stand accomplish? Some movies and other works of fiction pretend that Houston used the time to raise an army. During most of the siege, however, he was at the Convention of 1836 at Washington-on-the-Brazos and not with the army. The delay did, on the other hand, allow promulgation of independence, formation of a revolutionary government, and the drafting of a constitution. If Santa Anna had struck the Texan settlements immediately, he might have disrupted the proceedings and driven all insurgents across the Sabine River. The men of the Alamo were valiant soldiers, but no evidence supports the notion-advanced in the more perfervid versions-that they "joined together in an immortal pact to give their lives that the spark of freedom might blaze into a roaring flame." Governor Smith and the General Council ordered Neill, Bowie, and Travis to hold the fort until support arrived. Despite all the "victory or death" hyperbole, they were not suicidal. Throughout the thirteen-day siege, Travis never stopped calling on the government for the promised support. The defenders of the Alamo willingly placed themselves in harm's way to protect their country. Death was a risk they accepted, but it was never their aim. Torn by internal discord, the provisional government could not deliver on its promise to provide relief, and Travis and his command paid the cost of that dereliction. As Travis predicted, his bones did reproach the factious politicos and the parade ground patriots for their neglect. Even stripped of chauvinistic exaggeration, however, the battle of the Alamo remains an inspiring moment in Texas history. The sacrifice of Travis and his command animated the rest of Texas and kindled a righteous wrath that swept the Mexicans off the field at San Jacinto. Since 1836, Americans on battlefields over the globe have responded to the exhortation, "Remember the Alamo!"


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: alamo; davycrockett; godsgravesglyphs; sanantonio; texas; thealamo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: SpookBrat
I think I took my kids there on one of the trips to Minnesota. I know we stopped at all the sites whenever the kids were along. Of course, their favorite was Big Rock Candy Mountain and Flintstone Village! If memory serves me right, I have pictures of the kids up on a wagon of some sort. Guess I better get out my maps. :)
61 posted on 11/24/2002 2:35:31 PM PST by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
The siege of the Alamo is one of the more interesting episodes in Texas and American History.
62 posted on 11/24/2002 2:38:58 PM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Yes, it is. Thanks Sam. Good job on the thread.
63 posted on 11/24/2002 2:42:14 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing; MistyCA; Victoria Delsoul

Crockett's Last Sunrise, Battle of the Alamo
by Mark Churms

64 posted on 11/24/2002 3:00:45 PM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Thanks for the post. This Yankee needed your history refresher :).

Sure would be nice if G.W. Bush would read about the Alamo, and tell Senor Vicente Fox to "Remember Alamo".

65 posted on 11/24/2002 3:01:35 PM PST by undergroundwarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOA
Babbitt's minions did try to burn us down a couple of years ago. He should have resigned or been sacked.
66 posted on 11/24/2002 3:10:47 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: No Truce With Kings
I had heard (at least since 1950) that Crockett was executed later. This makes him no less a hero.

The only complaint about the Texas Revolution that I have heard from Mexicans is: "Why didn't you guys execute Santa Ana when you had the chance?"
67 posted on 11/24/2002 3:13:03 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
The traditional answer I have heard given to that question is that the Texans could obtain a credible cession/statement of their independence from Santa Ana if he lived, but there was no likelihood that the government in Mexico City would ever recognize Texan independence in a manner that would have international credibility.
68 posted on 11/24/2002 5:19:39 PM PST by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: No Truce With Kings
You missed my point. Crockett and all the rest knew Santa Ana was not a man of reason and therefore knew they would be executed if they surrendered. Santa Ana had told them his intentions in no uncertain terms.

Santa Ana didn't surrender at San Jacinto but was, in fact, captured while trying to escape dressed as a peasant. Sam Houston was not the barbarian Santa Ana was and thus did not execute the soldiers whom were captured. Likewise, Lee knew Grant would not execute those who surrendered. Crockett knew otherwise. Thus my question, why would he fight like hell and then surrender knowing he would be killed anyway. Finally, Mrs. Dickinson said later that Crockett had said to her, "I'd rather die out on that field that die trapped in here." He knew he was going to die therefore I'll never believe he surrendered.
But, I do agree that IF he did, his actions would not make him less a hero.

Forgive me my passion but my wife is a direct descendant of Crockett and I get a little riled whenever I hear this story about him surrendering and claiming to have been a tourist "trapped" inside the compound.
69 posted on 11/24/2002 7:09:30 PM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Ben Raines where are you now that we need you.

I know I have made this same statement on this board.........

70 posted on 11/24/2002 9:44:36 PM PST by SeaDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeaDragon
Another "Aashes" fan?
71 posted on 11/24/2002 9:47:33 PM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Oh yeah, big time. I have the complete series. I haven't finished reading them all but I have them.
72 posted on 11/25/2002 10:00:26 AM PST by SeaDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
I have read, but being at work cannot find the book to footnote, the surrender this way.

Crockett and six others were holed up in the long barracks savagely fighting for every second of life when the soldiers who had been advancing on them pulled back. A Mexican General called out to them, 'Do you hear that? The fighting is over. You are all that remain. Surrender and I swear that you will be treated with Honor as true fighting men."

After a few seconds of listening for fighting nearby, Crockett called out his surrender. They were led from the mission and taken to Santa Anna's command tent by the General and his men. When they walked in Santa Anna was going over a map. After a second, the brutal dictator lifted his eyes to look at the prisoners and said, "I told you no prisoners, kill them immediately." Crockett pulled a knife from his belt and lunged at Santa Anna but 6 bayonets found his chest.

I believe that this was from a memoir of the Mexican General who he had surrendered to. To me, this death is no less heroic or honorable than if he had died in the courtyard.

73 posted on 11/25/2002 10:36:32 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
bttt, March 6, 1836
74 posted on 03/06/2003 7:08:08 AM PST by bexardave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bexardave
Fall Of The Alamo

Thanks for he bump.

75 posted on 03/06/2003 7:23:37 AM PST by SAMWolf (We do not bargain with terrorists, we stalk them, corner them , take aim and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
I saw it and it was pretty disgusting. Davy Crocket tried to "sneak out" and was shot like a dog out in a field somewhere.

I saw this show last night, and I didn't come away with this impression.

The show did suggest a group of fifty men or so might have tried to retreat to Old San Antonio Road, but were cut down by cavalry. However, I don't remember the show saying that Crockett was with them.

It did suggest that near the end of the siege Crockett was taken prisoner and brough before General Santa Anna, who ordered him summarily executed. There were no details of his capture but it was not suggested that he had surrendered, only was captured and executed on the spot. If this is true, which I don't necessarily believe, it doesn't lessen my view of Crockett personally, or the defenders of the Alamo generally.

76 posted on 03/06/2003 7:24:34 AM PST by Liberal Classic (Quemadmoeum gladis nemeinum occidit, occidentis telum est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
The French surrender. This was being taken a prisoner of war. Splitting hairs, perhaps, but not quite the same thing.
77 posted on 03/06/2003 7:27:46 AM PST by Liberal Classic (Quemadmoeum gladis nemeinum occidit, occidentis telum est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
“Any age that does not exalt courage will be confounded by the Alamo, and baffled by the men who stayed in it. Any age that fears war more than servitude, or death more than honor, must denigrate the Alamo. Ages that do not honor the concept of liberty or death will fight no Alamos. Ages that do not cling to the great values of love, honor, courage, sacrifice, the soldier values, will not only fail to remember the Alamo, they may not long endure.” – T. R. Fehrenbach, Texas historian.
78 posted on 03/06/2003 7:28:21 AM PST by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
Thanks Cincinatus, I'm going to post this on the Foxhole Thread.
79 posted on 03/06/2003 7:32:23 AM PST by SAMWolf (We do not bargain with terrorists, we stalk them, corner them , take aim and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


· GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach ·
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
 Antiquity Journal
 & archive
 Archaeologica
 Archaeology
 Archaeology Channel
 BAR
 Bronze Age Forum
 Discover
 Dogpile
 Eurekalert
 Google
 LiveScience
 Mirabilis.ca
 Nat Geographic
 PhysOrg
 Science Daily
 Science News
 Texas AM
 Yahoo
 Excerpt, or Link only?
 


Note: this topic is from 11/24/2002. Thanks SAMWolf.

Blast from the Past.

Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
 

· History topic · history keyword · archaeology keyword · paleontology keyword ·
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword ·


80 posted on 06/13/2011 7:39:53 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson