Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Introduction to Zero-Point Energy
CalPhysics.org ^

Posted on 02/28/2003 2:59:02 PM PST by sourcery

Quantum physics predicts the existence of an underlying sea of zero-point energy at every point in the universe. This is different from the cosmic microwave background and is also referred to as the electromagnetic quantum vacuum since it is the lowest state of otherwise empty space. This energy is so enormous that most physicists believe that even though zero-point energy seems to be an inescapable consequence of elementary quantum theory, it cannot be physically real, and so is subtracted away in calculations.

A minority of physicists accept it as real energy which we cannot directly sense since it is the same everywhere, even inside our bodies and measuring devices. From this perspective, the ordinary world of matter and energy is like a foam atop the quantum vacuum sea. It does not matter to a ship how deep the ocean is below it. If the zero-point energy is real, there is the possibility that it can be tapped as a source of power or be harnassed to generate a propulsive force for space travel.

The propellor or the jet engine of an aircraft push air backwards to propel the aircraft forward. A ship or boat propellor does the same thing with water. On Earth there is always air or water available to push against. But a rocket in space has nothing to push against, and so it needs to carry propellant to eject in place of air or water. The fundamental problem is that a deep space rocket would have to start out with all the propellant it will ever need. This quickly results in the need to carry more and more propellant just to propel the propellant. The breakthrough one wishes for deep space travel is to overcome the need to carry propellant at all. How can one generate a propulsive force without carrying and ejecting propellant?

There is a force associated with the electromagnetic quantum vacuum: the Casimir force. This force is an attraction between parallel metallic plates that has now been well measured and can be attributed to a minutely tiny imbalance in the zero-point energy in the cavity between versus the region outside the plates. This is not useful for propulsion since it symmetrically pulls on the plates. However if some asymmetric variation of the Casimir force could be identified one could in effect sail through space as if propelled by a kind of quantum fluctuation wind. This is pure speculation.

The other requirement for space travel is energy. A thought experiment published by physicist Robert Forward in 1984 demonstrated how the Casimir force could in principle be used to extract energy from the quantum vacuum (Phys. Rev. B, 30, 1700, 1984). Theoretical studies in the early 1990s (Phys. Rev. E, 48, 1562, 1993) verified that this was not contradictory to the laws of thermodynamics (since the zero-point energy is different from a thermal reservoir of heat). Unfortunately the Forward process cannot be cycled to yield a continuous extraction of energy. A Casimir engine would be one whose cylinders could only fire once, after which the engine become useless.

ORIGIN OF ZERO-POINT ENERGY

The basis of zero-point energy is the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, one of the fundamental laws of quantum physics. According to this principle, the more precisely one measures the position of a moving particle, such as an electron, the less exact the best possible measurement of momentum (mass times velocity) will be, and vice versa. The least possible uncertainty of position times momentum is specified by Planck's constant, h. A parallel uncertainty exists between measurements involving time and energy. This minimum uncertainty is not due to any correctable flaws in measurement, but rather reflects an intrinsic quantum fuzziness in the very nature of energy and matter.

A useful calculational tool in physics is the ideal harmonic oscillator: a hypothetical mass on a perfect spring moving back and forth. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle dictates that such an ideal harmonic oscillator -- one small enough to be subject to quantum laws -- can never come entirely to rest, since that would be a state of exactly zero energy, which is forbidden. In this case the average minimum energy is one-half h times the frequency, hf/2.

Radio waves, light, X-rays, and gamma rays are all forms of electromagnetic radiation. Classically, electromagnetic radiation can be pictured as waves flowing through space at the speed of light. The waves are not waves of anything substantive, but are in fact ripples in a state of a field. These waves do carry energy, and each wave has a specific direction, frequency and polarization state. This is called a "propagating mode of the electromagnetic field."

Each mode is subject to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. To understand the meaning of this, the theory of electromagnetic radiation is quantized by treating each mode as an equivalent harmonic oscillator. From this analogy, every mode of the field must have hf/2 as its average minimum energy. That is a tiny amount of energy, but the number of modes is enormous, and indeed increases as the square of the frequency. The product of the tiny energy per mode times the huge spatial density of modes yields a very high theoretical energy density per cubic centimeter.

From this line of reasoning, quantum physics predicts that all of space must be filled with electromagnetic zero-point fluctuations (also called the zero-point field) creating a universal sea of zero-point energy. The density of this energy depends critically on where in frequency the zero-point fluctuations cease. Since space itself is thought to break up into a kind of quantum foam at a tiny distance scale called the Planck scale (10-33 cm), it is argued that the zero point fluctuations must cease at a corresponding Planck frequency (1043 Hz). If that is the case, the zero-point energy density would be 110 orders of magnitude greater than the radiant energy at the center of the Sun.

CONNECTION TO INERTIA AND GRAVITATION

When a passenger in an airplane feels pushed against his seat as the airplane accelerates down the runway, or when a driver feels pushed to the left when her car makes a sharp turn to the right, what is doing the pushing? Since the time of Newton, this has been attributed to an innate property of matter called inertia. In 1994 a process was discovered whereby the zero-point fluctuations could be the source of the push one feels when changing speed or direction, both being forms of acceleration. The zero-point fluctuations could be the underlying cause of inertia. If that is the case, then we are actually sensing the zero-point energy with every move we make (see origin of inertia).

The principle of equivalence would require an analogous connection for gravitation. Einstein's general relativity successfully accounts for the motions of freely-falling objects on geodesics (the "shortest" distance between two points in curved spacetime), but does not provide a mechanism for generating a gravitational force for objects when they are forced to deviate from geodesic tracks. It has been found that an object undergoing acceleration or one held fixed in a gravitational field would experience the same kind of asymmetric pattern in the zero-point field giving rise to such a reaction force. The weight you measure on a scale would therefore be due to zero-point energy (see gravitation).

The possibility that electromagnetic zero-point energy may be involved in the production of inertial and gravitational forces opens the possibility that both inertia and gravitation might someday be controlled and manipulated. This could have a profound impact on propulsion and space travel.


TOPICS: Technical
KEYWORDS: crevolist; darkenergy; darkmatter; fusion; realscience; space; stringtheory; transluminal; ufo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-285 next last
To: cinFLA
A common misconception by laymen is that the force is derived from "pushing against" the water/air as in pushing against a wall. In reality, the force is derived from the acceleration of the water/air. The force would be the same in a vacuum for the same amount of water/air accelerated even though there would be no air/water to push against.
78 -cinFLA-


The issue:

"The propellor or the jet engine of an aircraft push air backwards to propel the aircraft forward. A ship or boat propellor does the same thing with water. On Earth there is always air or water available to push against. But a rocket in space has nothing to push against, and so it needs to carry propellant to eject in place of air or water."
_________________________________

Perfectly simple point made above.
-- If you are on the ground you can push against it to move.
-- If you are in the water you can push against it to move.
--- If you are in the air you can push against it to move.
--- If you are in space you can't push against it to move, you must eject something away from you.

___________________________________


Now you claim:

"This all started because I took exception to the statement that a "propellor pushes" against the air/water."
-cin-

As we see above, you can't keep your story straight on ANYthing.



261 posted on 03/04/2003 10:09:50 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Obviously at a loss of words? Or just at a loss?

Whatever, Mr. c.

[crickets]

262 posted on 03/05/2003 4:43:50 AM PST by Oberon (This tagline intentionally left blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: js1138
placemarker
263 posted on 03/05/2003 7:10:36 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Perhaps you remember who wrote this about you.

"Hah! That's rich. "Personal attacks and insults" are your first and last names and inflicting pain is your game. Abuse reports from people with unclean hands are not taken seriously. If you want to be taken seriously on this forum you might think about cleaning up your act."

264 posted on 03/05/2003 8:02:12 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
So you can sling a personal insult then duck and run.
265 posted on 03/05/2003 8:04:30 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Let's look at an example: Say I'm out in space, with a large rock in my arms, and I throw the rock off in a certain direction. I would of course start moving in the opposite direction. Was I not "pushing" against the rock?
266 posted on 03/05/2003 8:30:17 AM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

Comment #267 Removed by Moderator

To: inquest
Let's look at an example: Say I'm out in space, with a large rock in my arms, and I throw the rock off in a certain direction. I would of course start moving in the opposite direction. Was I not "pushing" against the rock?

And?

268 posted on 03/05/2003 9:07:51 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

Comment #269 Removed by Moderator

To: cinFLA
So you can sling a personal insult then duck and run.

[more crickets]

270 posted on 03/05/2003 9:44:47 AM PST by Oberon (Choose well how you invest your time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
Many anarchist groups and publications used the word "libertarian" instead of "anarchist" to avoid state repression and the negative association of the former term. Libertarian Socialism differentiates itself from "Anarchy" as a movement only in that it specifically focuses on working class organisation and education in order to achieve human emancipation from the fetters of capitalism.

271 posted on 03/05/2003 10:02:21 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Many anarchist groups and publications used the word "libertarian" instead of "anarchist" to avoid state repression and the negative association of the former term. Libertarian Socialism differentiates itself from "Anarchy" as a movement only in that it specifically focuses on working class organisation and education in order to achieve human emancipation from the fetters of capitalism.

272 posted on 03/05/2003 10:02:43 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
REALLY pitiful, boyo.

'Projecting' your own hangups onto others is one of the more amusing results of your loss of control. Get some help.
273 posted on 03/05/2003 10:31:30 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
More 'projection' of socialistic rhetoric.
-- How droll.
274 posted on 03/05/2003 10:35:46 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
If it makes you feel better.
275 posted on 03/05/2003 10:38:27 AM PST by Oberon (Choose well how you invest your time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
And, what's your answer? Does it constitute pushing or not?
276 posted on 03/05/2003 11:56:23 AM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
Most of the force in a low bypass ratio jet engine is transmitted by the pressure on the turbine blades themselves, which of course react out their force on the shaft, which reacts against its bearing, which reacts against the shroud, which reacts against the pylon, which reacts against the airframe...resulting in "we be movin'!"
277 posted on 03/05/2003 12:03:19 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
spamjob placemarker
278 posted on 03/05/2003 4:05:58 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: longshadow

New World Order placemarker
279 posted on 03/05/2003 4:23:13 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: inquest
And, what's your answer? Does it constitute pushing or not?

I have no idea what your point is.

280 posted on 03/06/2003 7:14:30 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-285 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson